Iraqi security officials....suicide bomber has attacked .... Baghdad, killing 29 and wounding 60.

BREAKING: Iraqi security officials say a suicide bomber has attacked a football stadium south of Baghdad, killing 29 and wounding 60.

Suicide bomber kills 29 - IS takes the blame again

hi ATS, it seems there is a new terror attack by IS... I cant really grasp these people and how they can be so brainwashed!

When does this stop? Will it even stop, it seems it is getting worse and worse and I feel like there is more to come soon.

Bless these poor souls..

BREAKING NEWS: ISIS claims responsibility on attack at football stadium south of Baghdad, killing 29 and wounding 60.

link

I just read on another site the death toll is up to 60.

.........Change of heart. I'll leave this thread alone for now.

Praying for Iraq.

RIP.

a reply to: ypperst

is the world/ the West up in arms about a terrorist attack in Iraq? No, because we've already been bombing the piss out of them for 13 years now.

So sad how the masses will shed crocodile tears over the death of innocents in our "ally countries", but when something like this happens in Iraq, Africa, West Papau, no one even cares.




R.I.P. my thoughts are with the poor souls who have lost loved ones or been otherwise harmed from this attack...

a reply to: ypperst

It will never stop. I'm pretty sure the caliphate is enjoying all the vices he says followers of Islam must not enjoy.

Maybe if dressed up our army as school girls the muslims would meet them on the battlefield. Thats all they dare to attack it seems.

What I don't get is why leaders of countries want to be dictators. Saddam Hussein, Kaddaffi, the guy in Syria(name eascapes me) Assad?

Why run your country like a prison camp? what are they afraid of? a free and happy people being productive? all or mostly muslim countries.

And if we want these dictators out why don't we just offer them a mansion on a tropical island and millions of dollars?

The U.S. intervening in these countries militarily hasn't worked out so well. Why be a rich dictator of some sand swept poverty stricken land when you could live in luxury on a Caribbean island?

It wont stop until we ban Islam and Muslims. And that wont stop it. just make places safer. Or bomb mecca.

You have to get rid of the PC. Ask yourself if you would be comfortable living in an apartment that shared walls with an ameture bomb making facility. Seriously if you live with muslims you could be living in a bomb making factory. Do want to put your child at risk in the name of PC?

They can say the US has caused it, but for them to attack innocents just shows their cowardice.

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: ypperst

is the world/ the West up in arms about a terrorist attack in Iraq? No, because we've already been bombing the piss out of them for 13 years now.

So sad how the masses will shed crocodile tears over the death of innocents in our "ally countries", but when something like this happens in Iraq, Africa, West Papau, no one even cares.


R.I.P. my thoughts are with the poor souls who have lost loved ones or been otherwise harmed from this attack...

I think people do care but I don't see any malice behind caring less about areas that you don't have any connection to. You can't order people to care more for X or Y. Caring about something comes from within and has its roots in how much you are involved with said region.

Whilst I do care and feel very sorry for anyone around the world who falls victim to these terrorists, I sure SEEM to care more when it affects places I have been to, lived for years or have friends there.
I am not callous or racist, it is just beyond my human capability to care about everything, everywhere in exactly the same way, when there are no links. It just feels unreal.

We are by nature not even supposed to know what happens in the next village, let alone on the other side of the world.

a reply to: FamCore

I was thinking this same exact thing. We won't hear much about this from the media because "brown people" were the ones who were affected. They're trying to incite hatred against them, not sympathy.

This thread has 9 flags in 3 hours, the Brussels terror attack probably had twice or three times as many at this same point. That goes to show just how far the media's propaganda reaches, even onto a site whose members are supposed to "deny ignorance".

a reply to: FamCore

It's not that it's any less important in fact the nuance is vitally important to understand what exactly is going on, the bombings in Iraq are related to sectarian violence or violence against perceived apostates and cheaters. The attacks on the west are attacks against the kafir or infidel, these distinctions are made within the operating groups and the tenants they follow in the faith. People think this came out of no where, that if we never bombed these attacks would not happen, but that is demonstratively untrue, and yes of course innocent life lost no matter where it is, is never ok.

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: FamCore

It's not that it's any less important in fact the nuance is vitally important to understand what exactly is going on, the bombings in Iraq are related to sectarian violence or violence against perceived apostates and cheaters. The attacks on the west are attacks against the kafir or infidel, these distinctions are made within the operating groups and the tenants they follow in the faith. People think this came out of no where, that if we never bombed these attacks would not happen, but that is demonstratively untrue, and yes of course innocent life lost no matter where it is, is never ok.

Shhhh, you're destroying his narrative.

Didn't the person who predicted the Germany attacks say his next dream was at a stadium? Pretty sure, going to try to find and link it

Found it he's 2 for 2.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: Wardaddy454

But innocent people were killed either way. Where is the outrage like we see with the Brussels bombing?

You're not going to find it because it was a Muslim on Muslim attack and creating sympathy for the Muslims who were attacked goes against the agenda that the Western media is trying to push which is to demonize Muslims as a whole. It's only worth being outraged over when non-Muslims are the ones who are killed. That's called a double-standard.

It doesn't matter what the motives were, innocent people were killed either way but since it was in Iraq the media makes it a small side-story while continuing to sensationalize the Brussels attack 24/7.

One guy in the comments of the source said something along the lines of "as long as it stops future terrorists, I'm ok with it". Pretty disgusting if you ask me.

ETA: It wasn't the source, it was an article on Fox News about the same attack where a guy said that. My mistake.

These types of threads mean nothing anymore for my heart strings. Please, annihilate one another.

As for America

No More War!

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Are you implying that no Muslims were killed in the Brussels attack?

It really has nothing to do with race/ethnicity/religion; it has more to do with countries that share a similar culture/ideals as Western nations.

The reality is that unless you know the people personally that got killed, it's unlikely you will undergo a period of grief over their deaths.

Would you sacrifice 10 lives of strangers you don't know in order to save your own parent, child or sibling? When push comes to shove, I bet you would, though getting you to admit it would be difficult I predict...

a reply to: FamCore

There are many reasons for the so called lack of outrage.

Lack of familiarity with the culture.

For that matter, over familiarity. Burn out, if you will. How many times have we heard: "Explosions rocked downtown Bagdhad early this morning...early reports say as many as *** may have been killed, and many more injured.", in the past decade plus?

I call it the "what else is new" syndrome. ...and we all suffer from it to some degree or another.

...and you're smart enough to come up with other equally plausible reasons that have nothing what so ever to do with any form of bigotry.

Is there some bigotry? Sure. But it's hardly the main reason.

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: FamCore

People think this came out of no where, that if we never bombed these attacks would not happen, but that is demonstratively untrue, and yes of course innocent life lost no matter where it is, is never ok.

Really? Can you source that?

“I have the first complete set of data on every al-Qaeda suicide terrorist from 1995 to early 2004, and they are not from some of the largest Islamic fundamentalist countries in the world. Two thirds are from the countries where the United States has stationed heavy combat troops since 1990.

Another point in this regard is Iraq itself. Before our invasion, Iraq never had a suicide-terrorist attack in its history. Never.

Robert Pape: Over the past two years, I have collected the first complete database of every suicide-terrorist attack around the world from 1980 to early 2004. This research is conducted not only in English but also in native-language sources-Arabic, Hebrew, Russian, and Tamil, and others — so that we can gather information not only from newspapers but also from products from the terrorist community.

thewe.cc...

originally posted by: tinner07
It wont stop until we ban Islam and Muslims. And that wont stop it. just make places safer. Or bomb mecca.

i bet that many people around the world would LOVE to ban Murcia and americans. lightning has killed more people than any terrorist group in the world. How about we ban lightning ?

Its kicking off everywhere. I think we should all mobilise and take them out head on. Boots on ground and leave no stone unturned.