It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How many more? That’s all I could think this morning as news broke of yet another ISIS terror attack, this time in Brussels.
How many more innocent men, women and children are going to be blown to pieces by these murderous bastards?
How many more airports, train stations, sports stadiums, restaurants or concert halls will be obliterated in a hail of suicide bombs and bullets? How many more world leaders will wring their hands on national television afterwards and spout pointless platitudes about the ‘poor brave victims’ and ‘heroic emergency services’?
How many taunting, gleeful claims of responsibility will the despicable perpetrators of these evil crimes be able to issue? I’m sick of this, aren’t you?
The inherent problem which causes it, chaotic war-torn instability in the Middle East, is getting worse, not better; just as the financial and military resource of the enemy is growing greater, not reducing.
Yet just as the world is crying out for strong decisive leadership, there is none.
America has a demob happy President Obama eeking out his last few months in office. A man whose infamous ‘leading from behind’ philosophy to foreign policy has been partly responsible for the war in Syria raging uncontrollably for five years – allowing fundamentalism to ferment.
Obama has zero interest in doing anything tangible to really deal with ISIS. This is now parked in the tray marked ‘next president’s problem.’
Europe, meanwhile, is splintering at the seams, ravaged by an unprecedented migration crisis that nobody seems to have a clue how to handle.
German chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to let a million migrants into its country is already seen to be an utter disaster.
France, reeling from two horrendous attacks in Paris, is understandably highly fearful of yet more terror coming its way.
Belgium officials effectively conceded today that they have no real way to protect themselves against the ISIS threat. A fact surely born out by the fact that today’s onslaught in Brussels happened right when the city most expected it, following the capture of Paris attacks suspect Saleh Abdeslam three days ago.
Britain, surely a target anytime soon, is on red alert but its warring politicians are too distracted by the upcoming EU referendum in June to pay anything more than lame lip service to terrorism.
So nobody seems to be doing anything concrete to stop ISIS, or even suggesting a new way to do so given the spectacular lack of success to date.
Not only is there a severe lack of leadership, there's a severe lack of solutions from the supposed leaders. That is, aside from Trump who he interviewed today.
Trump told me countries must tighten their borders in light of these terror attacks, especially to anyone related to an ISIS fighter in Syria.
Is he so wrong?
He told me he wants law-abiding Muslims to root out the extremists in their midst, expressing his bafflement and anger that someone like Abdeslam was able to hide for so long in the very part of Brussels he had previously lived.
Is he so wrong?
He told me America must make it far harder for illegal immigrants to enter the U.S. and thinks European countries should follow suit.
Is he so wrong?
He told me he believes there are now areas of many major European cities which have become poisonous breeding grounds for radicalized Islamic terror.
Is he so wrong?
I didn’t feel I was talking to a lunatic, as many seem to view Trump.
I saw a guy, a non-politician unfettered by PC language restraints, who is genuinely furious at the devastation which ISIS is wreaking, and seriously concerned for the security of his fellow Americans and indeed, the citizens of Europe.
His plans for tackling this extraordinarily dangerous threat to the world have been widely condemned as ‘bigoted’ and ‘racist’.
But although I publicly criticised him for the Muslim short-term ban suggestion, I’ve known Trump for ten years and I don’t believe he’s a racist.
I think he’s someone who has spent his life responding to metaphorical punches on his nose by punching even harder back.
And right now, he firmly believes that ISIS will murder countless more Americans and Europeans if somebody somewhere doesn’t stand up and punch them hard in the face. Someone prepared to stop spewing politically-correct niceties after these attacks, hoping nobody gets offended, and actually DO something.
link
So why did I post this? Not because I think all that much of Piers, I'm not a fan of his. But rather, this inner dialogue of his which he put in print today represents the larger dialogue we're all having. It also explains why Trump is popular.
He's the only one since entering the race last summer has stood up and told the problem for what it is. Meanwhile, from the Obama/Clinton cartel preferring to defend Islam at all costs and European leaders also failing to not only address the problem but even covering it up, what we're stuck with are leaders who are more concerned about offending Muslims and Islam at large instead of offering solutions and confronting the issue head on.
Hence, Trump's rising popularity. Not everyone must agree with Trump but the lack of solutions from those who don't agree is startling.
Would I be happy with an ID program or halting Muslims coming to the US with connections to extremist states? Not really. It wouldn't be fair. Life however isn't fair and I recognize the intent behind it is to protect Americans from a larger threat, a new threat. What are the other solutions? Those who are offended by Trump's proposed policies aren't offering an alternative aside from essentially hoping it doesn't hit harder here in the future.
That's not a solution.
edit on 22-3-2016 by MysticPearl because: (no reason given)edit on 22-3-2016 by MysticPearl because: (no reason given)
Trump told me countries must tighten their borders in light of these terror attacks, especially to anyone related to an ISIS fighter in Syria.
Is he so wrong?
He told me he wants law-abiding Muslims to root out the extremists in their midst, expressing his bafflement and anger that someone like Abdeslam was able to hide for so long in the very part of Brussels he had previously lived.
Is he so wrong?
He told me America must make it far harder for illegal immigrants to enter the U.S. and thinks European countries should follow suit.
Is he so wrong?
He told me he believes there are now areas of many major European cities which have become poisonous breeding grounds for radicalized Islamic terror.
Is he so wrong?
I didn’t feel I was talking to a lunatic, as many seem to view Trump.
I saw a guy, a non-politician unfettered by PC language restraints, who is genuinely furious at the devastation which ISIS is wreaking, and seriously concerned for the security of his fellow Americans and indeed, the citizens of Europe.
His plans for tackling this extraordinarily dangerous threat to the world have been widely condemned as ‘bigoted’ and ‘racist’.
But although I publicly criticised him for the Muslim short-term ban suggestion, I’ve known Trump for ten years and I don’t believe he’s a racist.
I think he’s someone who has spent his life responding to metaphorical punches on his nose by punching even harder back.
And right now, he firmly believes that ISIS will murder countless more Americans and Europeans if somebody somewhere doesn’t stand up and punch them hard in the face. Someone prepared to stop spewing politically-correct niceties after these attacks, hoping nobody gets offended, and actually DO something.
link
So why did I post this? Not because I think all that much of Piers, I'm not a fan of his. But rather, this inner dialogue of his which he put in print today represents the larger dialogue we're all having. It also explains why Trump is popular.
He's the only one since entering the race last summer has stood up and told the problem for what it is. Meanwhile, from the Obama/Clinton cartel preferring to defend Islam at all costs and European leaders also failing to not only address the problem but even covering it up, what we're stuck with are leaders who are more concerned about offending Muslims and Islam at large instead of offering solutions and confronting the issue head on.
Hence, Trump's rising popularity. Not everyone must agree with Trump but the lack of solutions from those who don't agree is startling.
Would I be happy with an ID program or halting Muslims coming to the US with connections to extremist states? Not really. It wouldn't be fair. Life however isn't fair and I recognize the intent behind it is to protect Americans from a larger threat, a new threat. What are the other solutions? Those who are offended by Trump's proposed policies aren't offering an alternative aside from essentially hoping it doesn't hit harder here in the future.
That's not a solution.
Not only is there a severe lack of leadership, there's a severe lack of solutions from the supposed leaders. That is, aside from Trump who he interviewed today.
liberalism wouldnt exist if not for realism that freed it from monarchy and totalitarian repression.
notice I did not say conservatism. REALISM.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
Chunk of my post got cut off for some reason. Here's the rest.
One side vs the other: How many are being forced into "ghettos" as opposed to not integrating into other areas but congregating into one?
He told me he believes there are now areas of many major European cities which have become poisonous breeding grounds for radicalized Islamic terror.
Is he so wrong?
Source
Muslim ghettos in Paris and Brussels are incubators of Islamic extremism where police fear to tread, crime and unemployment are rampant and radical imams aggressively recruit young men to wage jihad against the West, experts said Tuesday.
I didn’t feel I was talking to a lunatic, as many seem to view Trump.
I saw a guy, a non-politician unfettered by PC language restraints, who is genuinely furious at the devastation which ISIS is wreaking, and seriously concerned for the security of his fellow Americans and indeed, the citizens of Europe.
So why did I post this? Not because I think all that much of Piers, I'm not a fan of his. But rather, this inner dialogue of his which he put in print today represents the larger dialogue we're all having. It also explains why Trump is popular.
He's the only one since entering the race last summer has stood up and told the problem for what it is. Meanwhile, from the Obama/Clinton cartel preferring to defend Islam at all costs and European leaders also failing to not only address the problem but even covering it up, what we're stuck with are leaders who are more concerned about offending Muslims and Islam at large instead of offering solutions and confronting the issue head on.
Hence, Trump's rising popularity. Not everyone must agree with Trump but the lack of solutions from those who don't agree is startling.
Would I be happy with an ID program or halting Muslims coming to the US with connections to extremist states? Not really. It wouldn't be fair. Life however isn't fair and I recognize the intent behind it is to protect Americans from a larger threat, a new threat. What are the other solutions? Those who are offended by Trump's proposed policies aren't offering an alternative aside from essentially hoping it doesn't hit harder here in the future.
That's not a solution.