Video Of UFO Traveling Well Above Supersonic Speeds!

a reply to: PrimeAutobot

The object skips frame to frame because it is moving at such a high rate of speed.Like the propellers in the video.

So the propellers are moving at super-sonic speed as well?

a reply to: PrimeAutobot


It doesn't SKIP frames as it appears in the FRAMES DOH!!!

The change in distance between frames is due to shutter speed video frame rate and distance of object and direction of motion relative to the camera.

I have been taking images for 35+ years I know what I am talking about.

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

screenshot of the bug from the video

picture of bug from google

I kind of see a lot of similarities.

Really? Lol That looks nothing like your insect.You people are really grasping at straws to explain this away.

Says the person who sees a video on the dailystar saying it's a ufo?

You don't know the distance from the camera for a start.
You can't conclusively say it is not a bug (as you can clearly see what looks like a wing).
Your guess of the speed is what the website is saying and not done by any calculation you have done yourself.

Yet I'm the one grasping at straws?

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot
Wow a silver bird/bug traveling so fast that it only makes it in a few frames? Really?

You can't tell the distance, hence, you have NO idea of the speed.

A bug up close.

I can clearly see the distance of the object.And it is in the background behind the building up high in the sky.If you want to keep thinking it's a bug that's ok...The earth is also flat and the center of the universe.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

screenshot of the bug from the video

picture of bug from google

I kind of see a lot of similarities.

Really? Lol That looks nothing like your insect.You people are really grasping at straws to explain this away.

Says the person who sees a video on the dailystar saying it's a ufo?

You don't know the distance from the camera for a start.
You can't conclusively say it is not a bug (as you can clearly see what looks like a wing).
Your guess of the speed is what the website is saying and not done by any calculation you have done yourself.

Yet I'm the one grasping at straws?

I have an idea contact the uploader his credits are on the website.

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

screenshot of the bug from the video

picture of bug from google

I kind of see a lot of similarities.

Really? Lol That looks nothing like your insect.You people are really grasping at straws to explain this away.

Says the person who sees a video on the dailystar saying it's a ufo?

You don't know the distance from the camera for a start.
You can't conclusively say it is not a bug (as you can clearly see what looks like a wing).
Your guess of the speed is what the website is saying and not done by any calculation you have done yourself.

Yet I'm the one grasping at straws?

I have an idea contact the uploader his credits are on the website.

So he can tell me his video of a BUG is a ufo as well?

There's already plenty of headcases out there that think normal objects are ufos. I don't need another one to tell me the same story.

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: PrimeAutobot


It doesn't SKIP frames as it appears in the FRAMES DOH!!!

The change in distance between frames is due to shutter speed video frame rate and distance of object and direction of motion relative to the camera.

I have been taking images for 35+ years I know what I am talking about.

That's exactly what I mean...

a reply to: PrimeAutobot

The eyes are easily tricked.

Although, with this video...there's no trickery...there is absolutely no way of knowing how far it is from the camera, but experience tells me....it's close.

Here's a video of some poor fellow getting his Ferrari stolen by god.. (also helps to illustrate what I'm talking about)

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

screenshot of the bug from the video

picture of bug from google

I kind of see a lot of similarities.

Really? Lol That looks nothing like your insect.You people are really grasping at straws to explain this away.

Says the person who sees a video on the dailystar saying it's a ufo?

You don't know the distance from the camera for a start.
You can't conclusively say it is not a bug (as you can clearly see what looks like a wing).
Your guess of the speed is what the website is saying and not done by any calculation you have done yourself.

Yet I'm the one grasping at straws?

I have an idea contact the uploader his credits are on the website.

So he can tell me his video of a BUG is a ufo as well?

There's already plenty of headcases out there that think normal objects are ufos. I don't need another one to tell me the same story.

See? Cognitive dissonance ...If something doesn't fit his or her paradignn call it a bug and the person taking the video a nut.

I suppose when Colombus sailed you would be one of the many claiming that he would fall off the earth?

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

The eyes are easily tricked.

Although, with this video...there's no trickery...there is absolutely no way of knowing how far it is from the camera, but experience tells me....it's close.

Here's a video of some poor fellow getting his Ferrari stolen by god.. (also helps to illustrate what I'm talking about)

The object in question is not a bug ...Now what could be besides a bug can only be speculation as I did in the opening post ..

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

screenshot of the bug from the video

picture of bug from google

I kind of see a lot of similarities.

Really? Lol That looks nothing like your insect.You people are really grasping at straws to explain this away.

Says the person who sees a video on the dailystar saying it's a ufo?

You don't know the distance from the camera for a start.
You can't conclusively say it is not a bug (as you can clearly see what looks like a wing).
Your guess of the speed is what the website is saying and not done by any calculation you have done yourself.

Yet I'm the one grasping at straws?

I have an idea contact the uploader his credits are on the website.

So he can tell me his video of a BUG is a ufo as well?

There's already plenty of headcases out there that think normal objects are ufos. I don't need another one to tell me the same story.

See? Cognitive dissonance ...If something doesn't fit call his or her paradignn call it a bug and the person taking the video a nut.

I suppose when Colombus sailed you would be one of the many claiming that he would fall off the earth?

Strawman much?

Of course the guys a nut. He thinks he saw a ufo when he obviously saw a bug. If I was to throw my kettle out the window and film it, it would still be a kettle, not some amazing, mega-shifting, shape-defying ufo.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

The object skips frame to frame because it is moving at such a high rate of speed.Like the propellers in the video.

So the propellers are moving at super-sonic speed as well?

Propellers move well over 2000 revolutions per minute.

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

The object skips frame to frame because it is moving at such a high rate of speed.Like the propellers in the video.

So the propellers are moving at super-sonic speed as well?

Propellers move well over 2000 revolutions per minute.

And at what speed is the bug....sorry....I mean ufo, moving?

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

screenshot of the bug from the video

picture of bug from google

I kind of see a lot of similarities.

Really? Lol That looks nothing like your insect.You people are really grasping at straws to explain this away.

Says the person who sees a video on the dailystar saying it's a ufo?

You don't know the distance from the camera for a start.
You can't conclusively say it is not a bug (as you can clearly see what looks like a wing).
Your guess of the speed is what the website is saying and not done by any calculation you have done yourself.

Yet I'm the one grasping at straws?

I have an idea contact the uploader his credits are on the website.

So he can tell me his video of a BUG is a ufo as well?

There's already plenty of headcases out there that think normal objects are ufos. I don't need another one to tell me the same story.

See? Cognitive dissonance ...If something doesn't fit call his or her paradignn call it a bug and the person taking the video a nut.

I suppose when Colombus sailed you would be one of the many claiming that he would fall off the earth?

Strawman much?

Of course the guys a nut. He thinks he saw a ufo when he obviously saw a bug. If I was to throw my kettle out the window and film it, it would still be a kettle, not some amazing, mega-shifting, shape-defying ufo.

Show me a bug doing the same thing in this video and I will call myself a nut.
If you cannot then admit defeat and call yourself a nut for thinking it's a bug.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

The object skips frame to frame because it is moving at such a high rate of speed.Like the propellers in the video.

So the propellers are moving at super-sonic speed as well?

Propellers move well over 2000 revolutions per minute.

And at what speed is the bug....sorry....I mean ufo, moving?

Nice try with the bait lol

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

screenshot of the bug from the video

picture of bug from google

I kind of see a lot of similarities.

Really? Lol That looks nothing like your insect.You people are really grasping at straws to explain this away.

Says the person who sees a video on the dailystar saying it's a ufo?

You don't know the distance from the camera for a start.
You can't conclusively say it is not a bug (as you can clearly see what looks like a wing).
Your guess of the speed is what the website is saying and not done by any calculation you have done yourself.

Yet I'm the one grasping at straws?

I have an idea contact the uploader his credits are on the website.

So he can tell me his video of a BUG is a ufo as well?

There's already plenty of headcases out there that think normal objects are ufos. I don't need another one to tell me the same story.

See? Cognitive dissonance ...If something doesn't fit call his or her paradignn call it a bug and the person taking the video a nut.

I suppose when Colombus sailed you would be one of the many claiming that he would fall off the earth?

Strawman much?

Of course the guys a nut. He thinks he saw a ufo when he obviously saw a bug. If I was to throw my kettle out the window and film it, it would still be a kettle, not some amazing, mega-shifting, shape-defying ufo.

Show me a bug doing the same thing in this video and I will call myself a nut.
If you cannot then admit defeat and call yourself a nut for thinking it's a bug.

You've already been showed videos and gifs of bugs doing close to what is done in that video.

Just because you don't want it to be a bug, doesn't mean it isn't a bug.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

screenshot of the bug from the video

picture of bug from google

I kind of see a lot of similarities.

Really? Lol That looks nothing like your insect.You people are really grasping at straws to explain this away.

Says the person who sees a video on the dailystar saying it's a ufo?

You don't know the distance from the camera for a start.
You can't conclusively say it is not a bug (as you can clearly see what looks like a wing).
Your guess of the speed is what the website is saying and not done by any calculation you have done yourself.

Yet I'm the one grasping at straws?

I have an idea contact the uploader his credits are on the website.

So he can tell me his video of a BUG is a ufo as well?

There's already plenty of headcases out there that think normal objects are ufos. I don't need another one to tell me the same story.

See? Cognitive dissonance ...If something doesn't fit call his or her paradignn call it a bug and the person taking the video a nut.

I suppose when Colombus sailed you would be one of the many claiming that he would fall off the earth?

Strawman much?

Of course the guys a nut. He thinks he saw a ufo when he obviously saw a bug. If I was to throw my kettle out the window and film it, it would still be a kettle, not some amazing, mega-shifting, shape-defying ufo.

Show me a bug doing the same thing in this video and I will call myself a nut.
If you cannot then admit defeat and call yourself a nut for thinking it's a bug.

You've already been showed videos and gifs of bugs doing close to what is done in that video.

Just because you don't want it to be a bug, doesn't mean it isn't a bug.

A gif is not a video last I checked..Also the bug in that video does not move across the whole frame.

I can say the same thing to you.Just because you want it to be a bug doesn't mean it's a bug.

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: PrimeAutobot


It doesn't SKIP frames as it appears in the FRAMES DOH!!!

The change in distance between frames is due to shutter speed video frame rate and distance of object and direction of motion relative to the camera.

I have been taking images for 35+ years I know what I am talking about.

That's exactly what I mean...

Can YOU not understand that you are mistaken first the OBJECT is not in the background it's depth of field that shows its close!!!!

The object is in ALL the frames the change in distance is due to frame RATE.

YOU might understand when you watch this the end makes it obvious.

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot
Show me a bug doing the same thing in this video and I will call myself a nut.

It has already been shown....

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: PrimeAutobot

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: PrimeAutobot

The object skips frame to frame because it is moving at such a high rate of speed.Like the propellers in the video.

So the propellers are moving at super-sonic speed as well?

Propellers move well over 2000 revolutions per minute.

And at what speed is the bug....sorry....I mean ufo, moving?

Nice try with the bait lol

It's an honest question. If you know for a fact that it's a ufo then you would know how fast it's going. The only problem is is you can't. Why? Because to know the speed you need to know a few things.

How long it took to go from point A to point B.
How far it travelled and how far from the camera it is. Hmm, do you know the answer to that?