It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The nuclear-power industry, invited by the governor’s office and the legislature, has floated plans to build a nuclear reactor along the I-70 corridor south of the Book Cliffs, with local county water rights to the drought-prone Green River ready for sale to supply the facility. Last June, the Utah Department of Air Quality, in expectation of full development of Utah’s Saudi Arabia, approved construction of a $230 million oil refinery near the Book Cliffs-East Tavaputs for the processing of oil shale and tar sands. The BLM has embraced preliminary plans for a new potash mine near Moab, and in September unveiled plans for oil and gas leasing on 144,000 acres in the remote canyon labyrinths of the San Rafael Swell west of Moab.
....
The Kaiparowits, he said, was full of coal. “One of the richest coal beds in America. This earth is to be used,” he said. “God put coal in the Kaiparowits for a reason. We need it! We need energy now, and our future needs more energy. And we need the roads to get to that energy.”
originally posted by: desert
a reply to: MOMof3
Oh, MOM, yes, getting out to enjoy nature is so relaxing and fun. Over the years with stagnant wages and "user fees" replacing "lower taxes", BLM land in particular is good for families to use. A few years ago, we were camped in the desert on BLM land when a family stopped by. They wanted to see our new offroad toy, and then they showed us the game birds they had just hunted (on BLM land) to take home, clean, and eat. Land use for The People, indeed!
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Gryphon66
Oh the tangled webs we weave... and all that rot.
Whatever. I wasn't trying to argue. I was trying to discuss. Big difference. I gave my opinion and asked for yours. But now I know where you're coming from... you disagree with me... you were arguing with me.... I just didn't know that. Now I do. Gotcha.
I submit that we return to equally ignoring each other's posts if that suits you.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Gryphon66
I submit that we return to equally ignoring each other's posts if that suits you.
Yes, please. And thank you. My methods of discussion/debate/argument are obviously not up to your standards, and since I'm not going to change, and I doubt you are either, there's really no point. So, yes, please.
It may turn out that if the states own it, the ranchers will just be angry at another level of government for a different set of reasons.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Gryphon66
Oh the tangled webs we weave... and all that rot.
Whatever. I wasn't trying to argue. I was trying to discuss. Big difference. I gave my opinion and asked for yours. But now I know where you're coming from... you disagree with me... you were arguing with me.... I just didn't know that. Now I do. Gotcha.
So you repeated the same thing you just said, and this is "discussion" ???
I provided the facts that you don't want to address. The fact that your contention is not accurate that "everybody" is against Federal land management, that US Government doesn't have the right to own and manage the land it does in the West on behalf of ALL AMERICANS, based on encoded law, etc. etc.
Continuing to respond personally and emotionally with no other evidence is pointless
I submit that we return to equally ignoring each other's posts if that suits you.