It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Before the primaries got underway in earnest, many assumed that Trump would fare more poorly than his poll numbers indicated because so many of his supporters had rarely voted in the past. But with this election, the past has not been a reliable predictor of future events.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: matafuchs
I am glad it won't be Hilary or the Communist, but will it really be *better* under Republicans? I am thinking we need a real change and not the same old politics.
This article is showing that a lot of those angry voters have been awakened and that support for the GOP is at a 10 year high.
America seems to have risen from slumber....
I am looking forward to some awesome debates. Does no one else want to see Hillary finally lose it on national TV? I do!!!!
originally posted by: theantediluvian
Predicting a GOP win in the general election based on high turnout in Nevada is more than a stretch. The dynamics are considerably different. When it comes to the general election, if either Trump or Cruz are the candidate, expect a big boost in turnout for the Democratic candidate. Rubio is more of a wildcard because he's successfully marketed himself as the "moderate option" and so he doesn't concern people as much as he would if they really understood how much he isn't a moderate.
The moderate swing vote won't vote Trump or Cruz, or at least not enough
originally posted by: Tardacus
a reply to: usernameconspiracy
The moderate swing vote won't vote Trump or Cruz, or at least not enough
They did in south carolinia, in fact the exit polls showed that most of trumps votes in south carolinia came from people who described themselves as moderate to slightly conservative, 40+ year olds.
it seems that the over 40 moderates love trump at least in south carolinia anyhow.