It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On top of which the "FEAR FACTOR" blatently being peddled, the biblical doom that started out as two years in the wilderness, is now being peddled as TEN YEARS in the wilderness.
If people use their imagination and common sense enough they will release that if we REMAIN in the EU then in 5 to 10 years after a further 5 to 10m migrants have found their way into the UK there is likely to be issues of this sort on a bigger scale inside the UK on our streets. Like I have iterated before the more migrants the more uncertainty and likely hood that there will be problems on UK streets and less safety for our children and daughters. Crime will become more of a problem also. Just take a good look at the situations in Macedonia, Calais and Dunkirk.
originally posted by: anxiouswens
Well if events at Macedonia and Calais today are anything to go by I think there are going to be real problems in Europe before June 23rd. I bet Cameron has been cursing migrants today for kicking off far too soon. I think he chose June thinking things wouldn't start hotting up until after June. With a bit of luck EU will start disintegrate before the referendum or at least it will make the undecided vote to leave a reply to: RP2SticksOfDynamite
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
If people use their imagination and common sense enough they will release that if we REMAIN in the EU then in 5 to 10 years after a further 5 to 10m migrants have found their way into the UK there is likely to be issues of this sort on a bigger scale inside the UK on our streets.
Like I have iterated before the more migrants the more uncertainty and likely hood that there will be problems on UK streets and less safety for our children and daughters. Crime will become more of a problem also. Just take a good look at the situations in Macedonia, Calais and Dunkirk.
Should they be told not to come because they are not needed or welcome. We want hospital staff, nurses and doctors born and trained in the UK. We want social housing for those who cannot afford to buy a home of their own. We want school places for our children at the nearest schools to their homes. We want jobs for those who want to work. We want our streets to be safe for old people and our children. We want to be able to walk the streets of our town centre's and feel comfortable and not after feel intimidated by groups speaking foreign languages. We want all illegals removing from the UK and those who finish their work here to be sent home. We want our country back for the British people and all laws defined and implemented in the UK. Its not nice when one feels like a foreigner in ones own country!
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
If people use their imagination and common sense enough they will release that if we REMAIN in the EU then in 5 to 10 years after a further 5 to 10m migrants have found their way into the UK there is likely to be issues of this sort on a bigger scale inside the UK on our streets.
When it reaches this stage The UK will be no more. It will be a satellite nation
of the Middle East.
Like I have iterated before the more migrants the more uncertainty and likely hood that there will be problems on UK streets and less safety for our children and daughters. Crime will become more of a problem also. Just take a good look at the situations in Macedonia, Calais and Dunkirk.
We have enough 'home grown' entitlement citizens without importing
others.
I have begun to think somewhere along the line that *Dick Whittington*
has become the obligatory bed time reading for children from these
other countries.
Someone needs to tell them that the streets of London are not paved
with gold.
originally posted by: and14263
I find it interesting how most debates focus on migrants.
originally posted by: 83Liberty
So basically my concern is not about the people who come but about the volume of people who come.
originally posted by: and14263
Certainly correct my man. However it's one topic in among hundreds which should be a decider. However the good old British media have already cast their immigration spell on the easily led population.
It just makes the whole debate one track minded and plays into the hands of those who do not wish us to understand the economy.
The damage has been done with regards to immigration. The damage has been done with regards to education. How many people voting really understand politics and economy? Most just read the papers and spout off about what they read.
I'll vote out but the real problems aren't whether we are in EU or not. The problems lie in our media and our leaders who will always be in love with power and money.
The EU existed in various forms before the UK joined, and it could of course function were it to leave, but the secession of the world’s fifth largest economy would severely compromise the EU’s integrity. It would also set a humiliating precedent: no state has ever left the EU.
Britain’s obstinacy and perseverance has already exposed cracks in a tottering union that’s throwing back up internal borders as we speak. The Dutch prime minister, Mark Rutte, accuses Britain of ‘opening a Pandora’s box’, and no wonder he’s fretful: a poll published on Monday showed that 53 per cent of people in the Netherlands would also like a plebiscite on EU membership. At present, 44 per cent of the Dutch population want to remain in the EU, with 43 per cent wanting out.
Elsewhere, the Czech prime minister, Bohuslav Sobotka, also warned this week that Britain leaving could prompt a ‘Czexit’ in a country now deeply hostile to the EU. Three-fifths of Czechs say they are unhappy with EU membership and 62 per cent said they would vote against it in a referendum. The French, for all their customary jibes about ‘perfidious Albion’, are now beginning to talk about ‘Franxit’. Even Serbia, that one-time pariah nation in the eyes of Western Europe, has gone cold on the union. Aleksandar Vucic, the Serbian Prime Minister, now says that EU membership is no longer the ‘big dream it was in the past’.
Whatever positive or negative outcomes Brexit may bring, the EU is past its sell-by date. It never helped to bring peace to Europe; its establishment was a symptom of a desire for peace, not the cause of it. Just as the Thirty Years War of the 17th century prompted Europe to make the collective mental decision never again to go to war with itself over religion, the carnage of the First and Second World Wars ushered in a new thinking among Europe’s great powers never again to fight over nationalism. Eighty years on and Germany no more desires to invade Poland than do French Catholics seek to massacre French Protestants – as they did a few centuries ago.
The EU was erected on an unfounded fear that Europe might descend once more into continent-wide, nationalist bloodletting. As Denis Healey, the former Labour defence secretary, once said of EU-philes: ‘Their Europeanism is nothing but imperialism with an inferiority complex.’ The EU was built on the twin pillars of pessimism and fear, which is why you still hear little else from the pro-EU camp today.
With the collapse of the EU, we will still go on trading and co-operating with each other in this digitalised, decentralised, globalised world, because historic enmities have vanished. We Europeans will certainly be happier once we’re no longer compelled to live in the same house and share a bank account. The desire for European fraternity was a noble idea and of its era, but 1945 was a different time and a different place.
originally posted by: Morrad
Another article from Spiked a few days ago. A few excerpts.
The EU existed in various forms before the UK joined, and it could of course function were it to leave, but the secession of the world’s fifth largest economy would severely compromise the EU’s integrity. It would also set a humiliating precedent: no state has ever left the EU.
Britain’s obstinacy and perseverance has already exposed cracks in a tottering union that’s throwing back up internal borders as we speak.
Whatever positive or negative outcomes Brexit may bring, the EU is past its sell-by date. It never helped to bring peace to Europe; its establishment was a symptom of a desire for peace, not the cause of it.
The EU was erected on an unfounded fear that Europe might descend once more into continent-wide, nationalist bloodletting.
With the collapse of the EU, we will still go on trading and co-operating with each other in this digitalised, decentralised, globalised world, because historic enmities have vanished. We Europeans will certainly be happier once we’re no longer compelled to live in the same house and share a bank account. The desire for European fraternity was a noble idea and of its era, but 1945 was a different time and a different place.
The EU is well past its sell-by date
As previously stated we need facts but we also need to counter the rhetoric from the Brexit camp.
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: Morrad
Another article from Spiked a few days ago. A few excerpts.
The EU existed in various forms before the UK joined, and it could of course function were it to leave, but the secession of the world’s fifth largest economy would severely compromise the EU’s integrity. It would also set a humiliating precedent: no state has ever left the EU.
Britain’s obstinacy and perseverance has already exposed cracks in a tottering union that’s throwing back up internal borders as we speak.
I think that is actually what they are frightened of and they are whistling in
the dark the EU is already crumbling at the edges .... it is a failed concept,
and UK leaving is the stone that will start the avalanche.
One of the fallacies they keep peddling is that the EU is the largest trading
union.
Well where as the might be large in the membership of having 28 members,
there are only about five countries of any substance, the others are very poor
and backward (that is why they are all trying to get into UK, Germany, France
and Sweden.)
Whatever positive or negative outcomes Brexit may bring, the EU is past its sell-by date. It never helped to bring peace to Europe; its establishment was a symptom of a desire for peace, not the cause of it.
The EU was erected on an unfounded fear that Europe might descend once more into continent-wide, nationalist bloodletting.
Isn't that why we have NATO??
With the collapse of the EU, we will still go on trading and co-operating with each other in this digitalised, decentralised, globalised world, because historic enmities have vanished. We Europeans will certainly be happier once we’re no longer compelled to live in the same house and share a bank account. The desire for European fraternity was a noble idea and of its era, but 1945 was a different time and a different place.
The EU is well past its sell-by date
Never a truer word spoken!!
As previously stated we need facts but we also need to counter the rhetoric from the Brexit camp.
Yes and we need the *OUT* campaigners to access to the paperwork
Cameron is hiding from them..... placing them in a disadvantageous position.
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
As previously stated we need facts but we also need to counter the rhetoric from the Brexit camp.
Yes and we need the *OUT* campaigners to access to the paperwork
Cameron is hiding from them..... placing them in a disadvantageous position.
Concur! I see a LEAVE majority on the horizon.
Officials and politicians have said several EU initiatives have been put on ice, or pushed off the agenda
in an effort to avoid stirring up controversy before the British referendum on June 23rd.
Among them is a mid term review of the 7 year budget to increase EU spending by 20 billion euros
and then there is the launch of the EU accession to the 'European convention of human rights' Which the
British government strongly opposes because it infringes on the sovereignty of the British legal
system
Politicians in Brussels have resigned themselves to the fact that not much legislation will go through until
after the UK referendum.
A French official said "ALL THESE PROPOSALS CAN BE DISCUSSED AFTER JUNE 23RD WITHOUT CREATING
TOO MANY DIFFICULTIES"
Italian MEP Mercedes Bresso added that the referendum was causing a "delay in some debates" including
on the EU budget "Now is not the moment to create more problems" These proposals can be
discussed after June 23rd without creating too many difficulties. In fact it would be more problematic
if we had to negotiate under the pressure of the UK
The European Parliamentary budgetary committee isn't expecting to see the 'proposals for revisions'
until the autumn ---- mainly to avoid a pre referendum outcry over the proposals to give more money
to the EU
Polish MEP Jan Olbrycht said >>>>
"THEY ARE NOT WANTING TO OPEN THE PANDORA'S BOX BEFORE THE REFERENDUM"
The UK's ambassador to the EU, Ivan Rogers has been putting pressure on leaders to complete deals like
the EU/Canada trade agreement and the EU/US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership before
the referendum to show that *The EU works* ??