It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: DBCowboy
No.
The government isn't going to start making aspirin and crutches and MRI machines. The government wouldn't have "ownership" (like the military) over the medical schools.
Means of production like what you envision already exist: the military.
We're not militarizing the health system.
People choose to be in the military. You can leave the military.
Let me tell you something. I can't drive right now and haven't been allowed to drive for 10 years. Guess why? I have epilepsy. The doctor says I can't drive so I can't drive. End of story.
Now of course that's a rational thing. It makes sense. But it doesn't HAVE TO make sense. A doctor is already a powerful person. Bring politics into the equation and give government the golden key and you'll find out real quick just how "sick" a person can be when it works for the government.
You can't opt out of government controlled healthcare. You can't even say no if they order you to go to the doctor. Even if you're not sick.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: DBCowboy
No.
The government isn't going to start making aspirin and crutches and MRI machines. The government wouldn't have "ownership" (like the military) over the medical schools.
Means of production like what you envision already exist: the military.
We're not militarizing the health system.
originally posted by: Signals
Either way OP, bad for America.
If he gets in, it's over. OVER.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: DBCowboy
I dunno about religion being infringed or the rising price of aspirin, sounds like right wing propaganda to me, but I do Bernie wants to make prescription drugs way more affordable.
originally posted by: yesyesyes
America has become so right wing that Sanders is just barely left of center compared to the rest of the world.
originally posted by: ketsuko
Oh, our bad, Bernie is more like Mussolini. He wants to control how production occurs, but someone else is welcome to own the factory he dictates all the terms to. Remember, Mussolini called himself a socialist too.
Fascism is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. Influenced by national syndicalism, fascism originated in Italy during World War I, in opposition to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism. Fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
So Bernie will dictate how much a drug company can make on their product?
“A guy named Adolf Hitler won an election in 1932. He won an election, and 50 million people died as a result of that election in World War II, including 6 million Jews. So what I learned as a little kid is that politics is, in fact, very important.”
— Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), interview in the Christian Science Monitor, June 11, 2015
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: RomeByFire
Socialism - destroying America, one snowplow and public library at a time.
I love this argument. It is perhaps the most intellectually dishonest and most stupid idea of all time.
Comparing Sanders to Stalin and Mao is not suggesting he is a totalitarian. It is suggesting that socialism has so many good ideas that they must be mandated, and in places where idealistic socialists have taken over, they have done so by killing millions of people while mandating socialism. The Soviets "collectivized the farms" by killing the farmers who resisted. And when you look at the result of this enforced socialism, you find stagnation and lowered living standards: Cuba, Venezuela, the USSR, etc. Now we can pretend China is "communist," but they surely do make good capitalists in real life.
And yes, you have a few rather tiny socialist-leaning countries who have small homogeneous populations. Bully for them. But the entire extremist idea that if we have public libraries, we must be socialists is laughable. NOBODY ever said you cannot pool resources for the common good, such as roads and fire departments, armies, and police departments, all paid for by tax dollars. Are these things technically socialist? Sure they are, but socialism suggests the government owns the means of production, and having public libraries doesn't do that.
Sanders is seen as a step in that direction. He seems to think the so-called wealthy have an infinite store of money he can divert to give free stuff to everyone else, particularly those who do not contribute themselves one dime to the common good themselves. It's a fool's game he is playing, and he's marginalizing "the 1%" just like Hitler blamed the Jews. It's the same tactic exactly. Would he personally be in favor of killing farmers? Of course not. I don't believe for a second that his as as extremist as the Marxists he admires. It's just that he's mired in a youthful past:
"If you are not a socialist before you are thirty you have no heart. If you are a socialist after thirty you have no head."
Sanders never made the transition. But if the extreme left gained a foothold on the means to power in this country I feel quite certain they would not be opposed to forcing their ideas on the rest of us by whatever means necessary.
Because if you have to lie to sell your ideology, then your ideology is flawed.