It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As if every single candidate ever hasn't done the exact same thing. This time though, people believe Bernie and are sick of lying, bought and paid for politicians.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Swills
As if every single candidate ever hasn't done the exact same thing. This time though, people believe Bernie and are sick of lying, bought and paid for politicians.
Bernie is not honest. What he says about the other candidates, what he says about Denmark, is all nonsense, but people eat it up.
originally posted by: AshOnMyTomatoes
There's a very big difference between federalizing what SHOULD be a public service like healthcare, and federalizing factories and farms and the like. Think a little harder on what the phrase "means of production" actually means.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: DBCowboy
No.
The government isn't going to start making aspirin and crutches and MRI machines. The government wouldn't have "ownership" (like the military) over the medical schools.
Means of production like what you envision already exist: the military.
We're not militarizing the health system.
Aspirin is cheap and over-the-counter. Let's talk about how much x-rays, MRI scans, and prescription medicine for life-threatening diseases cost, and how much they need to be not-for-profit. Or let's don't because this thread is about Bernie Sanders and Stalinism.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: MystikMushroom
But under a socialized medicine program, prices would be influenced and that, even indirectly, would affect the cost of aspirin.
The ONLY qualms I have about nationalized healthcare, is that some scumbag corporatist would try and defund and dismantle it like they're doing right now in the UK, causing national havoc. If things are properly funded, nationalized healthcare is the pride of nations lucky enough to have them. The NHS was in the London Olympics opening ceremony, they're so fond of it.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: AshOnMyTomatoes
There's a very big difference between federalizing what SHOULD be a public service like healthcare, and federalizing factories and farms and the like. Think a little harder on what the phrase "means of production" actually means.
Healthcare is a commodity, one that will be under government control.
originally posted by: AshOnMyTomatoes
Aspirin is cheap and over-the-counter. Let's talk about how much x-rays, MRI scans, and prescription medicine for life-threatening diseases cost, and how much they need to be not-for-profit. Or let's don't because this thread is about Bernie Sanders and Stalinism.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: MystikMushroom
But under a socialized medicine program, prices would be influenced and that, even indirectly, would affect the cost of aspirin.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Socialist or not, he's a pure demagogue, promising people exactly what they want to hear, but hardly what they need.
originally posted by: AshOnMyTomatoes
There's a very big difference between federalizing what SHOULD be a public service like healthcare, and federalizing factories and farms and the like. Think a little harder on what the phrase "means of production" actually means.
originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: RomeByFire
It's important to note he's not socialist. Despite what he says.
originally posted by: Gothmog
When Sanders was being "courted" by the Democratic Party did he not keep repeating he was a Socialist not a Democrat ?
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: DBCowboy
No.
The government isn't going to start making aspirin and crutches and MRI machines. The government wouldn't have "ownership" (like the military) over the medical schools.
Means of production like what you envision already exist: the military.
We're not militarizing the health system.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: Teikiatsu
Yeah, people certainly did die because of the cold war.
Sadly, greed kind of has that effect when you have armies to play real-life games of "Risk"" with.
And we the people just ate it all up, trusted and believed the propaganda (on both sides American and Russian).