It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Is HH 222 a natural OBSERVABLE Wormhole point?

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 06:06 PM

originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: 3danimator2014

Had to steal my kudos, huh?

I still want to know what that red pen looking thing might be.?

Lol...sorry man!

posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 07:44 PM
a reply to: 3danimator2014

All good!

posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 08:15 PM
Very interesting. I don't have the smarts to know one way or another. But I know Einstein was involved all the way back in 1935. The Einstein-Rosen Bridge, or wormhole, right? That they were dabbling in black holes and white holes so long ago is amazing to me.

Do you think ti's possible someday in the far future we might use natural worm holes to travel quickly from one place to another (or through time)? What're the limitations to that happening?

EDIT: Brief googling yields the answers: No. Apparently we'd need some kind of exotic matter which is presently unknown (or impossible).

Makes you wonder what kind of science we'll have in 10,000 years. What new things will we learn that chagne our society, sort of like how nuclear fission (and even fission-fusion bombs) changed energy and military. NASA, for example, has used our understand of radioactive decay and nuclear reactors to power many of its probes with suitable radioisotopes. Both Viking landers, for example, used RTG's.
edit on 2/16/2016 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 08:24 PM
Isn't a wormhole supposed to be a sphere? It only looks wormhole-ish if you represent space as a 2D surface and curve it through the 3rd dimension. A "hole" in 3D space would be a sphere... as explained and shown in Interstellar.

posted on Feb, 16 2016 @ 11:02 PM

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13

originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: Ophiuchus 13

What is the red "pen" looking thing in the lower right quadrant of the pic? That looks like something that fell out of someones pocket protector...

1 didn't mention that on purpose

good eye

Good eye? It's right there in the middle of the image.

Can you tell us why you think this is a wormhole. Might be easier than us telling you why it isn't.

A wormhole or Einstein-Rosen Bridge is a hypothetical topological feature that would fundamentally be a shortcut connecting two separate points in spacetime. A wormhole, in theory, might be able to connect extremely far distances such as a billion light years or more, short distances such as a few feet, different universes, and different points in time. A wormhole is much like a tunnel with two ends, each at separate points in spacetime.

For a simplified notion of a wormhole, space can be visualized as a two-dimensional (2D) surface. In this case, a wormhole would appear as a hole in that surface, lead into a 3D tube (the inside surface of a cylinder), then re-emerge at another location on the 2D surface with a hole similar to the entrance. An actual wormhole would be analogous to this, but with the spatial dimensions raised by one. For example, instead of circular holes on a 2D plane, the entry and exit points could be visualized as spheres in 3D space.

Basically following the Einstein-Rosen Bridge (Wormhole) theory when this image was viewed that was the first thing that came to mind, when 1 observed the non thermal radio emissions at the upper left of image. Also the flow of matter, that appears to be coming out of the described radio emission point seems to be drawn into the region located in the lower mid point of the image. To 1 it seems there is some form of energy there attracting the flow of matter. That form of energy to 1 subjectively would be related to neutron star(s) activity or magnetar if not a black hole(s). With the combination of sequences 1 describes potentially going on it seems something strong forced is interacting near the mid lower region of the image. Further noticing the more luminous region to the right of the mid lower region of the image, it looks like material is collecting -collected or gathered there, possible more dense or just more active then other material near it radiation wise.
Now look directly above it... It looks as if there is another luminous region 180 Degrees away. And in between them the RED EJECTI FROM JETS seem to be from a PULSAR. So again lots of neutron activity going on in that region possibly. This circuit of neutron activity leads 1 to thinking possible location of NATURAL WORMHOLE points and possibly more then one...
If so the described tube region of distance could would hypothetically cover massive distances within its matter flow area. So pulls into high speed matter flow de-materialize then use on board systems to re-materialize after so much distance traveled within tube flow as Particles.

Yes you need to turn to particles as light or dense as light or lighter and then re collect when location of interest found- outta box please excuse.

These are some of my reasons for presenting this OP. There ARE EA*RTH space scientist detected here on this site as well as secret space scientist
to keep it simple
so 1 felt what do they think? And so...

edit on 2/16/16 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 06:44 AM

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
This is what your able to observe from your theories of how wormholes work. But there would be points of travel from intra / entrance points to exit. That period could be what is being observed hence why 1 used observable. Anything entering a wormhole will travel through a theoretical Tunnel
that rips atoms apart and reconstructs them at exit? That tunnel yes is what 1 is asking is it possibly what is seen here.

Yes "WE" know scientist have theorized this before but cannot fathom the amounts of energy being generated there so they say maybe a white dwarf or black hole or maybe neutron star and some other cosmic components are there ALL GUESSES ... causing it

So is why asked why not. And you have explained why not
and 1 is thankful for you doing so. It does however seem you explained a portal access with intra-enter and exit being the same points simultaneously with no gap in between.

The tunnel is indeed "theoretical" as there is no actual "tunnel". The tunnel in the picture above isn't actually there.

Imagine yourself to be a space craft. There is a door up ahead. The door frame is 1 nanometer long (except it actually doesn't exist). Entry and exit place is the same spot. You are entering and exiting at the same time.

A wormhole doesn't have space to travel through. It's a hole in space between two points of space. Take two pieces of paper. One piece of paper is point A in space, the other is point B far far away. Put them together and punch a hole through them both in the same spot with a pen. one jab. Two pieces of space with a wormhole between them. No tunnel through space as what is shown in your picture..
edit on 17-2-2016 by DaRAGE because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 03:43 PM
a reply to: DaRAGE

Fair enough postulation
as mentioned I do wonder if it is possible to "ride" inside the flow of energy seen in the fall area.

posted on Feb, 17 2016 @ 07:41 PM

originally posted by: DaRAGE
No tunnel through space as what is shown in your picture..

It's a tunnel through an extra dimension of space. For the picture, the 3D space had to be flattened into a 2D sheet, thus allowing to show the tunnel in 3D. In our own 3D space, the entrance and exit would be a sphere, and the "tunnel" would be extradimensional, something that we can't perceive or even try to understand.

Thinking about the 4th dimension of space is fun, though. Take a look at the tesseract.

new topics

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in