It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: starfoxxx
i love my prescribed adderall it has been a life changer...
it is nothing like smoking or shoot meth its much safer..
ive known people using dexedrine for 20 plus years as prescribed no bad aging effects
no loss of teeth no infections from your injection marks..
and ive known tweeking meth addicts that started smoking them shoot meth at
25 now around 35 and its aged them no teeth they look about 60...
the whole story is kind of off base from the linked article
I'm impressed by that specific Natural News article, because they cite a large number of links to sources that back up their claims.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Naturalnews is a source that is frowned upon here. In fact, I think it's thought of worse than that, maybe even banned from here.
originally posted by: schuyler
Methamphetamine and dextroamphetamine are chemically different, though obviously related. But the fact is methamphetamine is available as a prescription itself. It's called Desoxyn. Under controlled conditions for certain disorders, either can be helpful. But that doesn't mean "therefore crystal meth" is okay.
If you believe it is, take a look here.. The people in these pictures "voted with their dollars" just like you advocate.
originally posted by: centarix
Adderall — prescribed to treat narcolepsy and "attention deficit hyperactivity disorder" (ADHD) in children as young as two — are in fact no different in action from meth. ... In fact, the active ingredients of Adderall are actually 75 percent dextroamphetamine salts; the other 25 percent are other amphetamines.
Source: www.naturalnews.com...
This means a few things. First, that there are probably cases where children may have been helped by crystal meth, making the drug war look like a big pharma scam to get higher pricing on their version of street drugs. Secondly, most of these cases may not have helped children at all and should be put into question. Third, it shows that it is up to us as individuals to determine what does and does not belong in our bodies, as the government does not have the right nor the responsibility to do so. The governments responsibility is to do what we say because of the idea of democracy, not the other way around.
All food and drugs should be regulated only by consumers in the marketplace by voting with their dollars about what is safe and what isn't, which companies are ethical and which are not, and which treat their employees well enough and which don't.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Naturalnews is a source that is frowned upon here. In fact, I think it's thought of worse than that, maybe even banned from here.
Huh? No, not banned at all. *Some* of us even read their site often.
If you believe it is, take a look here.. The people in these pictures "voted with their dollars" just like you advocate.