It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: f4andHALFtoads
a reply to: mbkennel
They may go through you at the speed of light, but their wavelengths are so long that the change in amplitude must be slow over time - I wonder how long a time; I forget the exact wavelengths we're talking for these waves, or the maths to process it...
What are the wavelengths of GWaves and how long would they take to pass through us at the speed that they go?
and this will give us what? more questions and less understanding?
these results will deepen our understanding of stars and galaxies. Astronomical evidence on black holes and massive stars are limited — it was hard to predict how many would be within range.
Pessimists thought that the events might be so rare that even the new and improved LIGO wouldn’t detect anything, at least for a year or two. But unless the experimenters have had exceptional “beginners’ luck” it looks as though a new kind of astronomy has opened up, revealing the dynamics of space itself, rather than the material that pervades it.
let's first try to find the answers to more fundamental problems in physics.
What a coincidence it's been 100 years...
does quantum mechanics really make sense?
how to unify different forces and particles?
what sets the masses of particles?
t isn't known why certain particles, such as the extremely corpulent top quark, are thousands of times more encumbered by the Higgs field than are lightweight particles, such as electrons and neutrinos. "Theorists have been searching for some way to actually predict [particle] masses from first principles. No convincing theory has yet emerged," said John Gunion, author of "The Higgs Hunter's Guide" (Basic Books, 1990) Source
what is dark matter en dark energy?
originally posted by: Astyanax
The science of quantum mechanics makes perfect sense. It accurately predicts how objects will behave under the action of different forces, which is one of the basic aims of physics.
originally posted by: Astyanax
The behaviour of objects in the real world sometimes does not ‘make sense’ in the way we conventionally expect it to, but that is not the fault of quantum mechanics. Blame nature.
originally posted by: Astyanax
I haven’t the faintest idea. The Higgs field confers mass on particles, but no-one knows why particles have different masses.
Touche'
originally posted by: combatmaster
a reply to: bandersnatch
Aren't gravity waves and gravitational waves to different things??
You conflate making sense with the ability of a theory to make accurate predictions. Quantum mechanics makes very little sense. As physicist Richard Feynman pointed out, no one understands quantum mechanics.
Some physicists do.
If QM makes sense to you, you must be the smartest person in the universe.
By saying forces are carried by particles, you mean that magnetic lines are real and particles are travelling through a field? (another term that no-one can explain, what's a field)
In particle physics, quantum field theories such as the Standard Model describe nature in terms of fields. Each field has a complementary description as the set of particles of a particular type. A force between two particles can be described either as the action of a force field generated by one particle on the other, or in terms of the exchange of virtual force carrier particles between them.
The energy of a wave in a field (for example, electromagnetic waves in the electromagnetic field) is quantized, and the quantum excitations of the field can be interpreted as particles. The Standard Model contains the following particles, each of which is an excitation of a particular field:
- Gluons, excitations of the strong gauge field.
- Photons, W bosons, and Z bosons, excitations of the electroweak gauge fields.
- Higgs bosons, excitations of one component of the Higgs field, which gives mass to fundamental particles.
- Several types of fermions, described as excitations of fermionic fields.
- In addition, composite particles such as mesons can be described as excitations of an effective field.
Gravity is not a part of the Standard Model, but it is thought that there may be particles called gravitons which are the excitations of gravitational waves. The status of this particle is still tentative, because the theory is incomplete and because the interactions of single gravitons may be too weak to be detected. Link
The discovery of G-waves could also be interpreted as proof of the existence of aether.