Is this new Black Knight footage?

Hey Guys, I just came across this but the footage just doesnt seem legit to me.

Thoughts?

Ah, isn't it nice having clear footage, from various angles, and proper zoom?

As for if it's the Black Knight or not, we can't really tell. It is definitely very interesting, and (to my limited knowledge) not shaped like a meteor.

a reply to: Tybrus

it turns and stops and start turning again

is that normal in space in orbit?

s&f

a reply to: Tybrus

agree with you... looks like repurposed actual docking -> footage with CGI stuff added,
seen similar stuff in 1950s Japanese Si-Fi films

I feel like section 51 is a relatively well known hoax channel....

a reply to: Tybrus

proceed with caution:

When debunker Scott Brando, aka ufoofinterest.org revealed professional CGI artist Jean “J. H.” Wzgarda of France as the person behind hoax channel Section 51 2.0

a reply to: Tybrus

Not sure if it is fake or not, seems a little too good to be true really doesn't it?

I am sure that someone who has lots of video of the ISS and those dockings could provide the footage without the artifact if it exists that is.

At least, if it IS fake, they took the time to do it well though.

And if it isn't, it deserves some investigation, doesn't it?

Yeah it just didnt feel right to me but I thought I would bring it up for a larger discussion.

a reply to: Tybrus

Yeah i'm not buying it.

However if it was viral marketing for the next Independence Day movie then it makes sense.

Looks like a funky piece of Rock to me, with a spin similar to a trick shot you can do on a pool table with a sphere.

CGI or not, it is rad and gives me nostalgia from when and why I joined ATS.

It probably is too good to be true, but even in the face of blatantly authentic footage, people have been messed with for so long, most would remain skeptical no matter what.

a reply to: GoShredAK

That is very true. There are some very shady operators on youtube for sure. However, banning videos just because they come from a certain source is counterproductive as we throw the wheat out as well as the chaff.

Some of those sources actually buy original source videos from other people to add to their channels, not everything they show is their own made up rubbish and it seems that some people forget that, or at least they act as if it doesn't matter.

Matters to me though, which is why ATS is NOT the source I come to for anything related to ufo's.

Hmmm, it struck me as kind of flimsy. Not the film so much but the artifact itself. Like it wobbled or bent in the wind, which of course we know there is no wind. So.... Seemed to do it in a few shots too. Like the same thing or clip being used over and over for the different angles. Was harder to catch it in the dark frames though.

That being said, I'd sure like to believe.

a reply to: Tybrus

I can't find a source at this minute, but that object has been explained as a runaway "tool belt" from an astronaut doing repairs on the Space Station, or some such thing.

Perhaps Jim Oberg or Phage will be by shortly to confirm a source.

a reply to: onehuman

I seem to remember that one of the explanations given for the black knight was some kind of cover made of material, engine cowling cover or something.

Maybe that has something to do with what you perceive.

a reply to: Jonjonj


Guess its better that it wobbled then instead of being solid if there is the case eh?

a reply to: Jonjonj

Thermal blanket that was lost during an EVA

Sigh seriously guys? It's an obvious CGI.

Has there actually been an ISS mission since December?

Looks to me like a compilation of videos with a fake object added.

Yep , looks like the Black Knight to me.
Thiugh why you'd give a thermal blanket a name is beyond me.