First The Assassination...then The Defamation......The Propaganda Machine Spews ..(Burns Standoff)

originally posted by: MyHappyDogShiner
a reply to: Gothmog

It was about the Hammonds being sentenced twice for the same supposed crime. Double Jeopardy.

Actually, it's much much more silly than that, this WHOLE thing started as a result of Bundy claiming his cattle were Sovereign and that they had the right to graze wherever they felt like it as they were COW: of the family Bundy, FreeCows.

It kinda ballooned out from there. But to me it will always be about making cow farts.

a reply to: schuyler

Not to mention your current post. Now I'm supposed to be "some sort of government employee."

Well it was just a guess really and I do hope you weren't
damaged by my vicious attacks. Unprovoked off the wall
fierce and ferocious as they must have been? How did you
even survive?

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: annalisa2016

Propaganda? Tyranny? Never would I have expected those two words to be applied to a situation that probably never should have happened in the first place, all over some cows, some grass and a whole lot of methane. Did it ever occur to you that this time maybe the BLM was actually correct? Of course not because you have to have the tyranny angle in all of the dealings between government and militias.

Did you even notice your retort isn't even relevant to my reply?
In no way did I at all mention the " Situation that probably never
should have happened". But I did manage to stay on topic.

You mean your post where you made some crap up, said I said it, then came completely unglued over something you made up?

I did address it. Hours ago. You've yet to acknowledge it.

There's your truth.

a reply to: Shamrock6

Seems quite a few people know exactly what I was getting at
despite your weak use of the blah blahs and a typo.
Not that impressive. At all.

Governments allowed to gun people down in cold blood according
to people under their comforters peck'n on lap tops.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: Shamrock6

Seems quite a few people know exactly what I was getting at
despite your weak use of the blah blahs and a typo.
Not that impressive. At all.

Governments allowed to gun people down in cold blood according
to people under their comforters peck'n on lap tops.

Goes both ways dude. You can't just start to charge at cops and expect to live if you don't stand down either, sometimes people in these situations need to use a modicum of common sense.

PSA

Let's get the focus back on topic and off of each other , Please.

a reply to: randyvs

I'll remember how much I support tyrannical governments next time I'm writing about the joke that is the war on drugs, how government shouldn't be legislating your bedroom, and all the other small/no government ideas I believe in.

But you, you got stars. You just be right. Of course, I got stars too. But you got more, so you must be MORE right.

Lots of people agree with Donald Trump. Personally, I think he's a jackass. But hey, people agree with him so he must be right!

If you care to discuss my actual comment and/or the OP, let me know. If you just want to star farm by ranting about what you think I think, write a blog. You've yet to actually address what I said as it pertains to the OP.

a reply to: randyvs

i think if you run from the police get out of your car yell shoot me then reach into your jacket when face to face with a cop, the government has a right to shoot you first.

i dont know, maybe im crazy. and if i am, everyone is crazy and you are sane, or the more rational point of view, you are crazy and everyone else is sane.

a reply to: Informer1958

The new generations of today been brain washed by a government targeted media will never understand what true liberties used to mean to the population in this country.

They just have a sense of liberty and illusion, but true liberty is not more.

a reply to: bandersnatch

"Erudite"???? The man was a paranoid whackdoodle with delusions of relevance.

nvm