It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Explanation: What is that dark sand dune doing on Mars? NASA's robotic rover Curiosity has been studying it to find out, making this the first-ever up-close investigation of an active sand dune on another world. Named Namib Dune, the dark sand mound stands about 4 meters tall and, along with the other Bagnold Dunes, is located on the northwestern flank of Mount Sharp. The featured image was taken last month and horizontally compressed here for comprehensibility. Wind is causing the dune to advance about one meter a year across the light bedrock underneath, and wind-blown sand is visible on the left. Part of the Curiosity rover itself is visible on the lower right. Just in the past few days, Curiosity scooped up some of the dark sand for a detailed analysis. After further exploration of the Bagnold Dunes, Curiosity is scheduled to continue its trek up the 5-kilometer tall Mount Sharp, the central peak in the large crater where the car-sized rover landed.
originally posted by: kumiho
One of the worst Photoshop images ive seen
originally posted by: NightFlight
Anyone notice,
There are no tire tracks visible
The electrical connections visible have quick disconnects on them on the rover
So, how did it get there and who would "quickly" work on it if one of the electrical or electro-hydraulic units failed?
Interesting...
originally posted by: wildespace
The dark sand on Mars is almost everywhere, even under the reddish coating that covers most of the planet.
All you have to do is dig.
originally posted by: wildespace
...All you have to do is dig.
originally posted by: frayed1
....so who's been digging?
...drew a bunch of 'chalk lines' on rocks in the fore ground, too.
interesting to say the least....
originally posted by: frayed1
originally posted by: wildespace
The dark sand on Mars is almost everywhere, even under the reddish coating that covers most of the planet.
All you have to do is dig.
....so who's been digging?
...drew a bunch of 'chalk lines' on rocks in the fore ground, too.
interesting to say the least....
originally posted by: Elementalist
originally posted by: kumiho
One of the worst Photoshop images ive seen
I was thinking same thing when I opened OP. Something doesn't sit right with that image. .
Also in the background, seems like someone playing with lighting, contrast, brightening etc. . Left side is light and such, then there is random "gloomy" region in the same space (sky/background).
It doesn't seem natural. I understend they may edit these photos prior to public release, to make them look better.
In such a process, the public is unaware of the editing taking place unless we have photo masters to chime in.
Always had the assumption, as nasa edits photos and releases them, they may also cover or completely remove landscapes or apparent anomalies.
Also, they always hide the background of the galaxy, stars etc. .
originally posted by: wildespace
originally posted by: Elementalist
originally posted by: kumiho
One of the worst Photoshop images ive seen
I was thinking same thing when I opened OP. Something doesn't sit right with that image. .
Also in the background, seems like someone playing with lighting, contrast, brightening etc. . Left side is light and such, then there is random "gloomy" region in the same space (sky/background).
It doesn't seem natural. I understend they may edit these photos prior to public release, to make them look better.
In such a process, the public is unaware of the editing taking place unless we have photo masters to chime in.
Always had the assumption, as nasa edits photos and releases them, they may also cover or completely remove landscapes or apparent anomalies.
Also, they always hide the background of the galaxy, stars etc. .
This image is a mosaic of several b&w photos taken by Curiosity's Navcam. The individual images have varying exposure levels, which is why the end result is a bit patchy. The bright area of the sky is where the Sun is.
Navcam mosaics and panoramas have always been tricky to assemble due to large field of view and great variation in exposure.
originally posted by: Elementalist
originally posted by: wildespace
originally posted by: Elementalist
originally posted by: kumiho
One of the worst Photoshop images ive seen
I was thinking same thing when I opened OP. Something doesn't sit right with that image. .
Also in the background, seems like someone playing with lighting, contrast, brightening etc. . Left side is light and such, then there is random "gloomy" region in the same space (sky/background).
It doesn't seem natural. I understend they may edit these photos prior to public release, to make them look better.
In such a process, the public is unaware of the editing taking place unless we have photo masters to chime in.
Always had the assumption, as nasa edits photos and releases them, they may also cover or completely remove landscapes or apparent anomalies.
Also, they always hide the background of the galaxy, stars etc. .
This image is a mosaic of several b&w photos taken by Curiosity's Navcam. The individual images have varying exposure levels, which is why the end result is a bit patchy. The bright area of the sky is where the Sun is.
Navcam mosaics and panoramas have always been tricky to assemble due to large field of view and great variation in exposure.
Umm.. no its not. The sun is not in the background. . It's behind the camera, look at the shadows of the robot. Shadows pointing AWAY from camera lens.
So that doesn't really explain the blotches in the sky in the background of the rover, that looks edited. .