Thunder Energies Corp Discovers Invisible Terrestrial Entities

originally posted by: BiffWellington
From the abstract:

"It is pointed out that both types of entities generally move in the night sky over sensitive areas, and their behavior generally suggests unauthorized surveillance."

There's your hint.

If there were an invisible critter that exhibited natural behavior similar to "unauthorized surveillance"; it would be captured, licensed and be doing classified sorties for a Navy guy based out of San Diego by now.

The acid test for almost all these claims is "did you hear about if before or after someone tried to monetise"?
If it's before - then there's usually something wrong.

sooo the sky-fishes can be real? only visible under certain conditions ?

a reply to: Elphineas

Because its garbage published in an unscientific "journal" and the media outlets either don't know or don't care (or both) so long as they get clicks.

a reply to: infolurker

This is science in the same way that a buffalo is a carrot.

No substantial explanation, no proper validation...I tire of these scams.

Wow....this could be huge.

I found research paper but didn`t have time to go through it yet...

www.thunder-energies.com...

Abstract: By using telescopes with concave lenses, known as Santilli telescopes (trademark and patent pending by the U.S. publicly traded company Thunder Energies Corporation), we review preced ing evidence for the apparent existence of antimatter galaxies, antimatter asteroids and antimatter cosmic rays. Independently from these astrophysical de tections, w e present for the first time ev idence for the apparent existence of entities in our terrestrial environment that are solely visible via telescopes with concave lenses, while being invisible to our eyes and to conventional Galileo telescopes with convex lenses, which entities leave dark images in the background of digital cam eras attached to the Santilli telescopes. These entities are here called Invisible Terrestrial Entities of the first kind (ITE - 1) or dark I T E. We then present, also for the firs t time, evidence for the appar ent existence in our terrestrial environment of additional entities that are also visible to telescopes with concave lenses while being invisible to our eyes and to conventional telescopes wi th convex lenses, which entities leave bright images in the background of digital cameras. These additional entities are here called Invisible Terrestrial Entities of the second kind (ITE - 2) or bright ITE . It is pointed out that both types of entities gene rally move in the night sky over sensitive areas, and their behavior generally suggests unauthorized surveillance. This paper has been motivated by the significance and diversification of the collected evidence, as well as available independent confirmatio ns, that warrant systematic inspections of the sky over our sensitive civilian, industrial, and military installations via telescopes with concave lenses, so as to detect possible unauthorized surveillance

From the paper...

2. Detection of Invisible Terrestrial Entities of the First and Second Kind (ITE-1 and ITE-2)

On September 5, 2015, at 9.30 pm the author aimed a pair of 100 mm Galileo and Santilli telescopes at the night sky over Tampa Bay, Florida, as seen from the NE orientation of the terrace of room 775 of the Vinoy Renaissance Hotel in St. Petersburg. Both telescopes were equipped with a Sony camera mode l SLT - A58 K set at ISO auto matic and 15 seconds exposure, the two cameras being activated jointly by remote shutters. The tests were merely intended for the search of antimatter galaxies and, consequently, the paired telescopes were aimed at the sky, but sudden clouds halted the tests and the author oriented the pair of telescopes horizontally over Tampa Bay.

To his great surprise, unidentified yet clear ly visible entities immediately appeared in the screen of the camera attached to the Santilli telescope, without any enlargement, with out the same entities being visible to the naked eyes, and without any corresponding image existing in the screen of the camera attached to the Galileo telescope. This unexpected discovery triggered a novel systematic use of the pair of Galileo and Santilli telescopes, this time, for the search of entities, here called Invisible Terrestrial Entities , that are invisible to our eyes as well as to our optical instruments with convex lenses, but are otherwise fully visible via th e Santilli telescope with concave lenses, and are located in our terrestrial environment , as defined in Section 1.

Following systematic tests, the author has detected the existence of at least two dif ferent types of ITE, with the acknowledgement that addit ional types may be identified inthe future. Thanks to independent confirmations on the existence of ITE, such as that by K. Brinkman, and September 25, 2015, at an invited lecture delivered to the St. Petersburg Astronomy Clubm [14].

In Figures 4, 5,and 6, we report representative examples of rather numerous detections of Invisible Terrestrial Entities of the first kind (ITE-1), here defined as entities that:

1) are not visible to the human eye or to conventional optical instruments with convex lenses, but are otherwise fully visible via Santilli telescopes with concave lenses;
2) exist in our terrestrial environment as defined in Section 1, rather than in deep astro-physical spaces; and
3) leave “dark images” in the background of digital cameras attached to Santilli telescopes.

In Figures 7 to 11, the author presents representative examples of Invisible Terrestrial Entities of the second kind (ITE-2), here defined as entities that:

1) are not visible to the human eye or to conventional optical instruments wish convex lenses, but are otherwise fully visible via Santilli telescopes with concave lenses;
2) exist in our terrestrial environment as defined in Section 1, rather than in deep astro-physical spaces; and
3)leave “bright images”in the background of digital cameras attached to Santilli telescopes.

A first significant aspect of the detections presented in Figures 4 to 11 is that they establish beyond “credible doubt” the capability of telescopes with concave lenses to focus images visible in the background of a digital camera attached to Santilli telescopes. These images are at times, visible without enlargement, thus establishing the utilities of telescopes with concave lenses.

A second salient aspect is that the focusing of images via concave lenses is solely possible for light having a negative index of refraction in the sense of being opposite that of ordinary light (Section 1).

A third salient aspect is that the emission of antimatter-light does not mean that the entity is made up of antimatter,because the existence of the entities within our atmosphere would imply a cataclysmic explosion due to matter-antimatter annihilation. Yet another salient aspect is that the emission of antimatter-light could well be evidence that their propulsion system is based on the extraction of antimatter from space intended as a universal substratum of the entire universe with an extremely high energy density (also known as zero point energy)[15].In short, it appears that ITE-1 consist of matter-entities in our terrestrial environment achieving locomotion via the acquisition of antimatter in their interior with consequential use of matter-antimatter propulsion, and achieve invisibility via the emissionof antimatter-light as a sort of exhaust.

A Post Ph.D. mathematical study of the new type of locomotion via the use of the new isodual Minkowskian geometry for antimatter is available in monograph [5]. A third salient aspect is that the creation of “dark images” in the background of digital cameras for ITE-1 (Figures 4-6) negative energy, since only a negative energy can annul the conventional positive energy existing in the pixels of the cameras. Consequently, the dark images of ITE-1 are caused by a type of light either equivalent or identical to antimatter light as presented in the preceding section.

By contrast, ITE- 2 (Figures 7 to 11) appear to be structures composed of matter which ordinary light (because of their bright character), yet possessing means to achieve in visibility via the conversion of their index of refraction from a positive to a negative value.It should be indicated that ITE-1 appear to be located mostly in the areas of terrestrial or lunar orbits. By contrast, ITE-2 are generally located irectly over sensitive civilian, industrial and military installations, and appear to behave in a way strongly suggesting their unauthorized surveillance

Figure 4. A view of an Invisible Terrestrial Entity of the first kind (ITE-1) detected in two different photos on September 5, 2015, in the evening sky over Tampa Bay, Florida, via the pair of 100 mm Galileo and Santilli telescopes with Sony Camera SLT-A58K set at ISO automatic and 15 seconds exposure. The entity is classified as an ISE-1 because it is solely detected via the Santilli telescope (thus emitting light with negative index of refraction), and it leaves a black image in the background of the digital camera (thus emitting light with negative energy).Since we are dealing with two different photos each taken with 15 seconds exposure, the entity moves at a relative small speed. Note the ridges of ordinary light surrounding the entity, which can only be explained quantitatively via the gravitational repulsion of ordinary light by the entity because, in the absence of such repulsion, ordinary light should merely experience diffraction. Note additionally that the entity “cannot” be composed of antimatter because, being within our atmosphere, it would annihilate with a cataclysmic explosion.

there is more...

a reply to: infolurker

the polite response = utter bollox

Im so glad there is scientific evidence now. Brings hope to all the people who aren't fully concious to wake up an smell the anomalies and possibilities of so much more life and realities then ever imagined.
This is disclosure!
The next step is tuning into different sound vibrations and hearing their language. So exciting. The best news ive heard in my life. Thanks for the post

a reply to: TimesAreChanging

Well, references are a bit questionable to say the least....I would not jump to any conclusions just yet.

originally posted by: TimesAreChanging
Im so glad there is scientific evidence now.

There is? care to show this "scientific evidence"?

a reply to: Op3nM1nd3d

The words are sciency but don't exactly make sense as used. Sort of like a turboencabulator.

Huh... way cool find and thanks for posting.

if legit, then as someone who thinks they have experienced "invisible critters" of some stripe, it's comforting I won't be ostracized from most polite conversation anymore... well, at least due to my assertions, anyway.

Still... my own jury is out barring way more info regarding this particular method of "seeing the invisible."

Offhand dismissal because there are no invisible critters is simply ignorant.

eta: and at least this concept should be easy to test and replicate... concave lens isn't exactly a "conflagulator"

originally posted by: Bedlam
a reply to: Op3nM1nd3d

The words are sciency but don't exactly make sense as used. Sort of like a turboencabulator.

For the uninitiated:

a reply to: Bedlam

Hehe...I have a tendency to get hyped before going through all of it, usually only to find myself disappointed at the end. But at least I gained a trait of skepticism while on board of ATS mothership

alarm bells rang for me when a man's invention is named after himself... while he is still alive haha, but thats just me

a reply to: Baddogma

at least this concept should be easy to test and replicate... concave lens isn't exactly a "conflagulator"

Agreed

originally posted by: NateTheAnimator
a reply to: infolurker

I smell bull#e...

It needs to be pointed out here that it is fairly well established that a simple cell phone camera--which is not as simple as you might think--is capable of picking up objects and light spectrums that the human eye cannot see. Want proof? Aim your TV remote at your phone's camera as you look through it.

Frequently, those unseen objects revealed later in outdoor images and viewed, enlarged on computer screens, appear to be our standard varieties of UFOs. So this outfit is merely inventing/developed something that it has not.

...And, yes, that is another proof that UFOs are something other than what conventional thinking allows.

a reply to: hellobruce
Look at the photos. That's the evidence. There's nothing else to explain this phenomena, ill stand by the telescope and the scientists behind it.

originally posted by: TimesAreChanging
a reply to: hellobruce
Look at the photos. That's the evidence. There's nothing else to explain this phenomena, ill stand by the telescope and the scientists behind it.

Don't forget about the youtube video. The guy has a You Freakin Tube video man, UTUBE doesn't lie and can't be manipulated. What else do you need ?

LOL I'm hoping you are being sarcastic?


There are significant issues with story and the so called scientific journal and the paper itself and even the scientist. This wouldn’t be the first time a scientist who is human would do something for nefarious intentions in making money.

nm