It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheSemiSkeptic
a reply to: introvert
Secretary Clinton broke no laws?!
General Petraeus lost his career and pension, paid a $100,000 fine and was sentenced to two years probation. All because he had ONE classified file in his desk at home. One file. Secretary Clinton had, at last count, over 1000 classified files on her unsecured server at her home. How is it General Petraeus broke the law and Secretary Clinton has not???
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheSemiSkeptic
No proof has been found that the information on her server was unsecured or compromised. If that is found to be true, then we can talk.
Simply stated, a SCIF is a U.S. Government accredited facility where Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) can be stored, discussed or electronically processed. Primarily Government and government-related contractors that require high security have the need for SCIFs. The areas of concern and special attention typically include physical security and hardening, acoustics controls, visual controls, access control, electronic and TEMPEST security.
In January 2015, the New York Times reported that that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Justice Department have recommended bringing felony charges against Petraeus for providing classified information to Broadwell. Petraeus had denied the allegations and was reported to have had no interest in a plea deal.[195] However, on Tuesday, March 3, 2015, the U.S. Justice Department announced that General Petraeus agreed to plead guilty in federal court in Charlotte, North Carolina to a charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified information. An attorney for General Petraeus, Robert Barnett, had no immediate comment.[196] On April 23, 2015, a federal judge sentenced Petraeus to two years’ probation plus a fine of $100,000. The fine was more than double the amount the Justice Department had requested.[197]
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TheSemiSkeptic
Shoulda, coulda, woulda. Doesn't mean Jack. You have to prove criminality. The opinion of others is irrelevant. It appears you may not be informed as to how far Patraeus went.
In January 2015, the New York Times reported that that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Justice Department have recommended bringing felony charges against Petraeus for providing classified information to Broadwell. Petraeus had denied the allegations and was reported to have had no interest in a plea deal.[195] However, on Tuesday, March 3, 2015, the U.S. Justice Department announced that General Petraeus agreed to plead guilty in federal court in Charlotte, North Carolina to a charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified information. An attorney for General Petraeus, Robert Barnett, had no immediate comment.[196] On April 23, 2015, a federal judge sentenced Petraeus to two years’ probation plus a fine of $100,000. The fine was more than double the amount the Justice Department had requested.[197]
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
Again, what laws were broken? You can bloviate all you like, but laws must broken to prosecute someone.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
If what you say is correct, prove she committed a crime. No one has been able to do so, so far.
No charges have been filed against her.
We can go back and forth but until you can actually prove it, you're just wasting my time.
Again, wishful-thinking and crying wolf.
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
If what you say is correct, prove she committed a crime. No one has been able to do so, so far.
No charges have been filed against her.
We can go back and forth but until you can actually prove it, you're just wasting my time.
Again, wishful-thinking and crying wolf.
So by your logic, if no one is charged then a crime has never been committed. Nice logic.
documents or materials containing classified information
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
If what you say is correct, prove she committed a crime. No one has been able to do so, so far.
No charges have been filed against her.
We can go back and forth but until you can actually prove it, you're just wasting my time.
Again, wishful-thinking and crying wolf.
So by your logic, if no one is charged then a crime has never been committed. Nice logic.
It's a high-profile case with many against her waiting in the wings to pounce on any information that could lead to charges.
If she committed a crime, she will be charged. Prove she committed a crime and quit wasting my time with absolute bull#.
By your logic we should charge and convict someone without due process or properly-vetted evidence.
That's idiocy and against the very principles this nation was founded upon.
All telephone, electrical power, security systems, data and emergency systems equipment must be dedicated to and contained within the SCIF. Any utility that enters the SCIF should terminate in the SCIF and not traverse through the space. Where the conduit for any of these systems penetrate the SCIF perimeter, they must be treated to minimize the chance of compromise. Fire sprinkler systems and other metallic materials that penetrate SCIF perimeter must be grounded or use dielectric unions. Additional shielding or isolation is often required to prevent interference or electronic eavesdropping through electromagnetic or radio frequencies.
There are very specific requirements for ductwork. For example, if ductwork for mechanical operations has openings in the SCIF larger than 96 square inches, they must be equipped with steel man bars that are ½-inch in diameter and 6 inches on center each way, welded at the intersections, with inspection ports inside the SCIF. The openings, the ductwork and the duct breaks must also have special sections inserted to secure audio and electronic emanations from leaving the SCIF space.
n most cases the perimeter doors must utilize two access control technologies. The first one for operational day-to-day use, and the second for high security lock up when personnel leave the space unattended. The door and frame assembly must not only meet local building and fire/life safety requirements, but must also achieve the same specified Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating as the perimeter wall assemblies of the facility.
If the bathroom that the server was stored in or her residence that it was stored in do not meet the specific requirements set forth by the government for the storage of classified information, then criminal charges most certainly do apply
Are you telling me that the bathroom and her residence met these requirements
EDIT: I see that you are once again back to the prove it was classified argument. YOu are just baiting people at this point and I hope a mod steps in to end this endless cycle of nonsense.