It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: Soloprotocol
Most sprinkler systems are control mode.
They are there to help contain the fire in one area. The firefighters are the ones that usually put out the fire.
And this is assuming the building has a sprinkler system. We don't know what the building codes in Dubai are like. If they even enforce having a sprinkler system.
That's a shame.
originally posted by: Dr UAE
as reported the fire started from the outside not from the inside that's why it's spreading fast because of the cladding
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Dr UAE
as reported the fire started from the outside not from the inside that's why it's spreading fast because of the cladding
Would you not need an accelerant for that? I would think that the cladding would not be combustible.
originally posted by: Dr UAE
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Dr UAE
as reported the fire started from the outside not from the inside that's why it's spreading fast because of the cladding
Would you not need an accelerant for that? I would think that the cladding would not be combustible.
sorry couldn't understand what you mean not my mother tongue , could you clarify
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: Dr UAE
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Dr UAE
as reported the fire started from the outside not from the inside that's why it's spreading fast because of the cladding
Would you not need an accelerant for that? I would think that the cladding would not be combustible.
sorry couldn't understand what you mean not my mother tongue , could you clarify
I believe the poster is asking if any kind of additional fuel (i.e. accelerant) such as petrol, kerosene, etc... would be needed to ignite the building material.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Is that an elevator shaft or fire escape on fire in that picture? It looks like a vertical line of fire up through all those floors. If that is the case, it doesn't seem like an accident to me.
originally posted by: dogstar23
originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Is that an elevator shaft or fire escape on fire in that picture? It looks like a vertical line of fire up through all those floors. If that is the case, it doesn't seem like an accident to me.
Insurance fire? Do they have those in Dubai like we do in the US?
And just keep living in the LIES we're told??? That's EXACTLY the problem. We just want to sweep things under a rug, while hoping they magically get better. Meanwhile, there's another Bush in office, pushing the same "unite to fight the terrorists" crap.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: redchad
Please, can we NOT bring 9/11 into this conversation about a current building fire, 1/2 a world away?
Cost-conscious developers have left a legacy of fire risk in many of the United Arab Emirates’ iconic high-rise towers. Many fear this legacy will soon cost lives.
Around 70 percent of the UAE’s high-rise buildings are thought to be covered in aluminium composite panels, which have been favoured by developers keen to keep costs down without compromising aesthetics. The problem with the panels is that the thermoplastic core sandwiched in their centre is highly flammable and causes fire to spread rapidly up and down the building.
The panels are thought to be responsible for the spread of several high-rise fires in Dubai and Sharjah over the last 18 months, including the April fire at the Al Haffeez Tower and the fire that gutted the Tamweel Tower in Dubai in November.
originally posted by: Dumbass
This is where the fire started:
twitter.com...
to keep it in the ATS realm:
It looks like an Illuminated American Lantern that flew in the building just like an emergency code that probably has been predicted by an 80's movie.