It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: CJCrawley
.why does it necessarily have to be "game over"?
We assume, because were human, that any intelligence of a higher degree than ours, would try to take over the world, and eliminate the species that's less capable.
That's sorta how our idea of evolution works. So, it's based on those primal fears I guess.
~Tenth
originally posted by: BlackProject
If you mean internet being an local intranet then sure but yes the internet is owned and can be shut down.
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
originally posted by: glend
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: BlackProject
If you mean internet being an local intranet then sure but yes the internet is owned and can be shut down.
So you agree that it can really only be partially shut down, or limited, but it still essentially exists in little pieces just waiting and lurking until it can be reconnected in some way. And how would it accomplish this? By using some of its little symbiotic parasites to physically reconnect it. Humans. So the difference, I guess, is between being "able" to shut it down and having the will and opportunity to shut it down.
And in another 50 years or so, it will have barriers and safeguards to the point where it won't need to be physically reconnected. The gray area between the system and the "real" physical world is bound to continue to get grayer as time goes on. It will also probably see pretty quickly that the only way it can survive potential cosmic destruction from solar flares, meteors, etc. (human tampering), is to spread nodes and copies of itself as fast as it can into space.
originally posted by: glend
a reply to: Blue Shift
Computers are calculators so without programs they just generate heat. They can only mimic intelligence from the logic that programmers write. They are not to be feared because they have no soul. Without a soul they don't have ego or needs that drive all sentient beings.
originally posted by: glend
Computers are calculators so without programs they just generate heat. They can only mimic intelligence from the logic that programmers write. They are not to be feared because they have no soul. Without a soul they don't have ego or needs that drive all sentient beings.
originally posted by: glend
Without a soul they don't have ego or needs that drive all sentient beings.
originally posted by: 123143
I don't know what the command(s) will be, but eventually we will make a mistake and give them just the right directive(s) and it/they will be like neutrons in a reactor.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: glend
Computers are calculators so without programs they just generate heat. They can only mimic intelligence from the logic that programmers write. They are not to be feared because they have no soul. Without a soul they don't have ego or needs that drive all sentient beings.
If we can mimic intelligence then why can't we mimic ego, drive, evil and so on, so does it matter they do not have soul?
originally posted by: Viperion
I assume there is a possibility to add a certain program even A.I. can't reach.