It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NthOther
So which right-wing propagandists do I get all my information on liberals from?
Surely you must know, if you're willing to levy the charge that I don't think for myself on the matter. I'm kinda curious myself.
It couldn't possibly be that I read what these people write day-in and day-out, could it? It couldn't possibly be based on my own experience and assessment, could it?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: angeldoll
Men are separated from women in Mosque, not women from the men.
Secondly Muhammad said the most important person in life is your mother, the 2nd most important is your mother, and the third most important person in life is your mother, 4th is your father.
Women are not subservient via Islam, they're subservient via Middle Eastern practice much like the women in "Christian" Africa.
originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: Metallicus
For whatever reason, the modern definition of "liberalism" is essentially socialism or, at least, anti-capitalism. It makes no sense but, there you go.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: angeldoll
Anecdotes aside, which we could all exhibit, it doesn't come from the Quran.
It comes from parts of the Middle East.
Hindus do the same in India, but it's not Hinduism that's to blame.
Buddhists massacre people in Burma/Myanmar, but it's not Buddhist behaviour.
originally posted by: mahatche
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: angeldoll
Anecdotes aside, which we could all exhibit, it doesn't come from the Quran.
It comes from parts of the Middle East.
Hindus do the same in India, but it's not Hinduism that's to blame.
Buddhists massacre people in Burma/Myanmar, but it's not Buddhist behaviour.
I haven't read the entire thread so forgive me if it has been covered.
There is no denying that Buddhists in Myanmar have killed Muslims, but as far as I know there is nothing in the Buddha's teachings that says "kill non believers" or really anyone for that matter. The Buddhists in Myanmar can not claim to be inspired by the Buddha's words.
The same is not true for Islam and other Abrahamic religions, they are full of justification for violence. If you made a list of things people could be killed for in the Quran or the Bible and compared it to the list of things a person can be killed for in Buddhism or Jainism there is an undeniable difference in the number of examples.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: mOjOm
You refuse to look at facts. You can admit that or not. But it is apparent you have no argument.
originally posted by: mOjOm
You do realize that in some places in Africa homosexuality is considered a crime punishable by death or life in prison. Very similar to those places in the Middle East doing the same. Only in Africa it's not the Muslims who pushed those laws but Christians.
Does that mean that is what all Christians everywhere also believe??? Or does that "all inclusive" thinking only go for Muslims??