Codex Orionis: Giza's Monuments Speak

originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet

Many don't want to recognize the loop holes in our perceived history,
however all lies become washed clean with the rinsing of time.

Many here are recognising the holes in your perceived history, as it is only perceived by you when you have deliberately and dishonestly fudged all the numbers

My next thread details the question you ask as part 2 to this Codex where as diligently as
the Great Pyramid was covered, I will show through the use of Google Earth in full color that Nazca is a complete rendering in full detail in megalithic form that could only be deciphered using todays technology revealing themselves as the Great Pyramid's colossal blueprints.

Yet the dating proves you wrong time and again, lets hear you dismiss radiocarbon dating again by pretending that its still the 1940s, because that was convincing. NOT

Nazca is a stop along the way to truth and could be construed as the fabled Hall of Records as a message
and not the true complicated complete blueprint.

The fabled hall of records, that was invented by Edgar Cayce while he was asleep and based on Madame Blavatskys earlier claim for Akashic records, yes, lets join your work with those two proven frauds shall we, it'd be in great company...


You should realise, that what little support you had here, has now gone. As it is at the Hancock forum.
You are wasting your time with this.
Your imagined glory of showing academia that you know more about history than them has become a laughable failure and a testament to your mental state and narcissism. That's the only truth on display here

Forgot to answer this

originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
a reply to: Byrd

My insinuations regarding ancient cultures were purely to show their knowledge of astronomy and why Baalbeks' Jupiter temple was used as was Nabta Playa and others.

The problem here is that it does not show this.
* "Adam's Circle" can't be proven to be ancient.
* Nabta Playa does not show sophisticated astronomy
* Baalbek's Jupiter temple does not have any correlation to astronomy (the Romans had good astronomy by then.)

And Egypt's astronomy was primitive compared to Babylonia/Persia (Babylonia recorded Haley's comet in 164 BC - the first record ever, though it shows up regularly in the sky every 76 years.) They also calculated the position of the planets forward from any date (saying where Mercury would be in a year or two years)
India (not Greece/Rome/etc) next shows up as the premier astronomical society around 300 BC with star charts and tables.
Greece's mathematicians added to the knowledge.
And astronomy takes off under in Arabia and Persia during the Medieval period and that provides the foundation for our modern astronomy.

The three examples you cited show nothing about astronomical development and are not any of the key sites used in establishing a history or timeline of astronomy.

a reply to: Byrd

Again - my significance to the astronomy statement is that our ancients
understood the movement of the moon and stars. Mythology from history tells it was a gift
from the God's i.e. the AE - the Dogon's - Mayans etc.

Mythology and oral traditions tell of a past intelligent civilization no longer here.
How intelligent we can only question. The knowledge of advanced math, geometry and astronomy continually
arise such as Gobekli Tepe said to be of astrological values..as is Stonehenge and many others said to be, and show them selves of this advanced knowledge.

Finding academia to be unanswerable for certain questions and in direct conflict without others, the loop holes became evident and what knowledge I found from others works and thesis's where the simple number 13 led a consecutive transmission as a communicative language. Interesting how the letter M plays a part in math and artisans history as M numerically is 13.

When you understand the math of eight Imperial equates thirteen metric,,the Codex is simply undeniable as it is clear from our records - our past ancestors we have documented did not know of a math this advanced so could not have left this message...and yet it is right there.

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
The great pyramid is 481 feet tall. 4+8=12+1= 13.

Wrong again. The great pyramid is 455.4 feet tall today, and ororiginally it was 480.6 feet tallOf course, the actual number doesn't work with your deceitful numerology shenanigans.

480.6 rounds up to 481 which is the common reference most give in explanation of G1's height.

4+8=12+1= Thirteen

They really didn't make this complicated to see.

originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
a reply to: Byrd

Again - my significance to the astronomy statement is that our ancients
understood the movement of the moon and stars. Mythology from history tells it was a gift
from the God's i.e. the AE - the Dogon's - Mayans etc.

In an earlier post you mention the "Hall of Records" which never existed prior to Cayce and his magic dream trance and there is zero evidence to substantiate it today. Now you try to claim the Dogon knew something they didn't and this has absolutely been shown to be the case by Anthropologists who visited them AFTER Temple came up with his falsified lies for cash scheme. The diagram Temple based his premise on wasn't even the entire diagram, which was shown to legitimate French Anthropologists.mEven Carl Sagan called out Robert Temple on his shenanigans and was one of the first people to suggest that Temple himself gave certain info to the Dogon in order to promulgate his premise. It's a joke and you are the punch line for still believing this tripe decades later.

Mythology and oral traditions tell of a past intelligent civilization no longer here.

No they don't. Not the way you're presenting it at least. There isn't some mysterious ancient culture that you have given an iota of evidence for.

How intelligent we can only question. The knowledge of advanced math, geometry and astronomy continually arise such as Gobekli Tepe said to be of astrological values..as is Stonehenge and many others said to be, and show them selves of this advanced knowledge.

Blanket statements with no supporting data? No.....say it ain't so!

Finding academia to be unanswerable for certain questions and in direct conflict without others, the loop holes became evident and what knowledge I found from others works and thesis's where the simple number 13 led a consecutive transmission as a communicative language. Interesting how the letter M plays a part in math and artisans history as M numerically is 13.

One word... Pareidolia. You have to preconceived notion that there are patterns and then go out of your way to create them in any way you can with no regard for consistency and methodology. Whatever route you need to take to get the number you want to see is what works right? What examples can you provide of things academia is unanswerable to or in opposition to per your claim?

When you understand the math of eight Imperial equates thirteen metric,,the Codex is simply undeniable as it is clear from our records - our past ancestors we have documented did not know of a math this advanced so could not have left this message...and yet it is right there.

There is no codex, therefore I find the entire premise entirely deniable. You keep claiming these people didn't know the requisite math yet these monuments stand in defiance to your assertions. The dats ascribed to them hold true. And your approach regarding what dated you are willing to accept are schizophrenic. In one thread, you claim that 14C is unreliable and therefore the date of the GP is wrong. In another thread you cite 14C dated to support your current thesis. It's all over the map with inconsistency, just like the numbers and calculations.

originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
The great pyramid is 481 feet tall. 4+8=12+1= 13.

Wrong again. The great pyramid is 455.4 feet tall today, and ororiginally it was 480.6 feet tallOf course, the actual number doesn't work with your deceitful numerology shenanigans.

480.6 rounds up to 481 which is the common reference most give in explanation of G1's height.

4+8=12+1= Thirteen

They really didn't make this complicated to see.

Thank you for proving my point, that for in order for your 'math' to work, you have to either make up numbers completely, or round them, using units that have only existed for a few hundred years. Even then you arbitrarily decode which ones are important, and when to add, and when to multiply, etcetera. It's nothing more than a new spin on tired old numerology hokum, and it doesn't hold up.

originally posted by: Marduk

originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet

Many don't want to recognize the loop holes in our perceived history,
however all lies become washed clean with the rinsing of time.

Many here are recognising the holes in your perceived history, as it is only perceived by you when you have deliberately and dishonestly fudged all the numbers

My next thread details the question you ask as part 2 to this Codex where as diligently as
the Great Pyramid was covered, I will show through the use of Google Earth in full color that Nazca is a complete rendering in full detail in megalithic form that could only be deciphered using todays technology revealing themselves as the Great Pyramid's colossal blueprints.

Yet the dating proves you wrong time and again, lets hear you dismiss radiocarbon dating again by pretending that its still the 1940s, because that was convincing. NOT

Nazca is a stop along the way to truth and could be construed as the fabled Hall of Records as a message
and not the true complicated complete blueprint.

The fabled hall of records, that was invented by Edgar Cayce while he was asleep and based on Madame Blavatskys earlier claim for Akashic records, yes, lets join your work with those two proven frauds shall we, it'd be in great company...

You should realise, that what little support you had here, has now gone. As it is at the Hancock forum.
You are wasting your time with this.
Your imagined glory of showing academia that you know more about history than them has become a laughable failure and a testament to your mental state and narcissism. That's the only truth on display here

The Sarsen link you shared I've read before - interesting how many 13's show in the' Estimated above ground weight (tonnes)' of the article you linked though so thank you once again.

You misjudge me.. I NEVER lie and I am not delusional -
GH's site still has viewers and commenters. My website has gained over 20 members in the last 3 days plus members on Facebook...and I've just begun
The view count in less than 48 hours was..ready for this - almost 1300 views.


Would you like picture confirmation on my other statements to vouch for my integrity -
just ask as I am always happy to assist.

The Hall of Records comes from Thoth -

"Use thou the KEY of the SEVEN,
and open to thee the pathway will fall.
Now unto thee I have given my wisdom.
Now unto thee I have given my way.

Follow the pathway.
Solve thou my secrets.
Unto thee I have shown the way.

Each to the other is the Keystone;
each the gateway that leads into LIFE.
Follow the KEY I leave behind me. Know ye that
Seek and the doorway to LIFE shall be thine.
Seek thou in my pyramid,
deep in the passage that ends in a wall.”

Know ye that in the pyramid I builded are the Keys
that shall show ye the Way into life.
Aye, draw ye a line from the great image I builded,
to the apex of the pyramid, built as a gateway.
Draw ye another opposite in the same angle and direction.

Dig ye and find that which I have hidden.

There shall ye find the underground entrance to

the secrets hidden before ye were men."
..


Regardless of what mythology, history or whatever that I have used - the fact that the numbers show themselves as abundantly that they do in different forms of Imperial, metric and Pi shows I am founded in my theory.

Is the log in your eye stifling your vision ?

Pi multiplied by itself [or squared] (2)+1 equals the same to the Thirteenth place, which consequently is the only number doing and also significant because of 8 Imperial Inter-changing with 13 as Pi is 3.14..or see it as I do..3+1+4 equals 8. The use of 8 as 13 - and 13 as 8 -mirroring each other becomes quite obvious when researching G1's numbers which presents a dignified clearer message. The Great Pyramid reveals it's eight sides twice a year to show this codex. Eight sides and a height of 481 feet numerically adding up Thirteen.
[G1 height 481 feet 4+8=12+1= 13]
The three Giza pyramids are also 8 miles (13 kilometers) away from the Nile.

Giza makes no mistake's regardless of how established your math prowess is as it explains an astronomical message conveying a higher math to understand (A.U) Astronomical Units.

Pi is the essential slice to this astronomical 13 equation in understanding..

.. a peace of pi so sweet like honey to the taste

of Giza's truth but bitter

to the lies of academia's stomach!

Here is more 'pyramid math' showing G1's message is NO accident.


pyramid stats:
The original entrance was located on the north face, about 49 feet (4+9=13) above the base and 24 feet east of the central axis of the north face. The Great Pyramid is the most accurately aligned structure in existence and faces true north with only 3/60th of a degree of error. The Great Pyramid is located at the center of the land mass of the earth. The east/west parallel that crosses the most land and the north/south meridian that crosses the most land intersect in two places on the earth, one in the ocean and the other at the Great Pyramid. About 70 feet along the north side of the Great Pyramid from the northeast corner is a 4×10 ft stone sunk into the foundation at an angle. The joints are very precise and this is the only stone in the foundation perimeter not at a right angle to normal construction. It would have been covered by the mantle but is now accessible since the mantle is gone. It is very likely an entrance. No further investigation has been done. The pyramid was used to indicate solstices and equinoxes, which is also associated with the Precession of the Equinoxes: and the ever changing pole star.

The capstone is thought to have been an exact replica of the large pyramid on a scale of 1 to sqrt(Pi)/100 The top surface is 5478 pyramid inches above the mean socket level. Another 335 pyramid inches higher is the geometric apex formed by the corner edges of the projected mantle. The 35th course of stones is roughly 50 inches tall (3+5+5=13), nearly twice the height of the previous courses. The height of the 35th course = 1162.6 PI from ground or the length of the Antechamber x 10. The height of the pyramid to the missing apex formed by extending the sides is 5813 PI. The height to the missing apex is 5812.98 PI. The four faces of the pyramid are slightly concave, purposely being built this way. The centers of the four sides are indented with an extraordinary degree of precision forming the only 8 sided pyramid. The effect is not visible from the ground or from a distance but only from the air, and then only under the proper lighting conditions. The slant face height of the Great Pyramid’s sides are 7391.72 PI.

Many 13's I left uncovered and in the open for ANYONE's verification.

originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
You misjudge me.. I NEVER lie and I am not delusional

I'm not convinced of either.

My website has gained over 20 members in the last 3 days plus members on Facebook...and I've just begun
The view count in less than 48 hours was..ready for this - almost 1300 views.

Congratulations. Would you like a cookie or something? Number of views is in no way related to the accuracy (or lack thereof, in this case) of the site's content.

The Hall of Records comes from Thoth

No, it comes from The Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean, written by Maurice Do real in the late 1930s. It's a work of pure fiction, and not even original fiction, as large parts of it are plagiarized from Richard Shaver and H.P. Lovecraft.

...the fact that the numbers show themselves as abundantly that they do in different forms of Imperial, metric and Pi shows I am founded in my theory.

That may be true, if said numbers 'showed themselves abundantly' I'm reality, and not just in your mind.

Pi multiplied by itself [or squared] (2)+1 equals the same to the Thirteenth place

This doesn't even make sense. Pi squared plus one is 10.8596.

or see it as I do..3+1+4 equals 8.

You see it wrong.

The use of 8 as 13 - and 13 as 8 -mirroring each other becomes quite obvious when researching G1's numbers which presents a dignified clearer message.

No, it doesn't.

The Great Pyramid reveals it's eight sides twice a year to show this codex.

When it was built (and as long as the casing stones were still intact), there were only 4 sides. The extra 'sides' are internal structural features, and were never visible, nor were they intended to be.

Eight sides and a height of 481 feet numerically adding up Thirteen.
[G1 height 481 feet 4+8=12+1= 13]

The more you keep using your pseudo-numerology crap, the more your credibility drops.

The three Giza pyramids are also 8 miles (13 kilometers) away from the Nile.

Earlier you were going on about distances measured in imperial units. Now it's metric units that are significant? So the ancient Egyptians knew not one, but two systems that weren't invented until thousands of years later?

Giza makes no mistake's regardless of how established your math prowess is as it explains an astronomical message conveying a higher math to understand (A.U) Astronomical Units.

This sentence makes no sense.

Here is more 'pyramid math' showing G1's message is NO accident.

Sources, please.

Many 13's I left uncovered and in the open for ANYONE's verification.

Along with any other number one chooses to focus on...

a reply to: Marduk

The fabled hall of records, that was invented by Edgar Cayce while he was asleep and based on Madame Blavatskys earlier claim for Akashic records, yes, lets join your work with those two proven frauds shall we, it'd be in great company...

I would just like to add that the hall of records or akashic records is not something new which does two discovered. Well it may be for westerners but otherwise it is a very old esoteric knowledge. Yogis of india for instance have known about it for a long time or aboriginal dream space. Or shamans around the world, etc...just about every spiritual culture has an alternative label for it.

It is very old knowledge which was just intruduced to us by Casey and Blavatsky. This things exists but science will probably not discover it for a long time or will deny it forever. Luckily Individual can find it with certain spiritual practices. Everyone can do it with practice...

So I would not diss so easily what Casey and Blavatsky were about. Maybe there were more truth to them than people here think here on ATS. How do you know for yourself if you did not probably even try it yourself and are relying only on other opinions?

originally posted by: UniFinity
a reply to: Marduk

The fabled hall of records, that was invented by Edgar Cayce while he was asleep and based on Madame Blavatskys earlier claim for Akashic records, yes, lets join your work with those two proven frauds shall we, it'd be in great company...

I would just like to add that the hall of records or akashic records is not something new which does two discovered. Well it may be for westerners but otherwise it is a very old esoteric knowledge. Yogis of india for instance have known about it for a long time or aboriginal dream space. Or shamans around the world, etc...just about every spiritual culture has an alternative label for it.

It is very old knowledge which was just intruduced to us by Casey and Blavatsky. This things exists but science will probably not discover it for a long time or will deny it forever. Luckily Individual can find it with certain spiritual practices. Everyone can do it with practice...

So I would not diss so easily what Casey and Blavatsky were about. Maybe there were more truth to them than people here think here on ATS. How do you know for yourself if you did not probably even try it yourself and are relying only on other opinions?

The mythology of the Hall of Records is a popular one among those who hold alternative theories of Ancient Egypt. The phrase "Hall of Records" originated with Edgar Cayce

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: Marduk

yeah...just his label for the stuff which is described in many older other texts. He figured it out since I think a teenage years that he can have OBE and also he could access various information (OBE - another new age label, but people here don't know other terms). For him OBE and hall of records was a spontaneous process without any previous knowledge and so he called it as it suited him. Nothing wrong with that. If I had an OBE when I did not know anything beforehand, I would labelled it my way also.

But the concepts and meanings behind words are the same since thousands of years, like in yoga or aboriginal tradition which is 65 thousand of years old. This is obvious for anyone who studies him and yoga or other esoteric stuff.

originally posted by: UniFinity
But the concepts and meanings behind words are the same since thousands of years, like in yoga or aboriginal tradition which is 65 thousand of years old.

Hahaha really? That may just be the most absurd thing said in this thread yet. Thanks for the laugh.

a reply to: UniFinity

Hahahahahahahahahaha

Words and meanings have changed so much over the course of a few hundred years, let alone thousands.

Take the word buns. First used to describe someones behind. Now it is used for that AND a bread roll. And then there's the word gay. Used to mean happy, gleeful, etc. Now also means homosexual.

So there's just 2 examples of how words and meanings have changed in recent times.

originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
a reply to: Byrd

Again - my significance to the astronomy statement is that our ancients
understood the movement of the moon and stars. Mythology from history tells it was a gift
from the God's i.e. the AE - the Dogon's - Mayans etc.

But you didn't prove it.

You cited one possible hoax, a site that's unproven as to its significance and a structure that had nothing to do with astronomy. None of these show that these people had a functional astronomy and none show that they believed it was a gift from the gods. The Dogons did NOT have a functional astronomy, by the way (and the Sirius connection was later shown to be collected from a Dogon who was Western educated and lived in the city and was not someone practicing or familiar with the older beliefs.)

Mythology and oral traditions tell of a past intelligent civilization no longer here.

Egyptian literature does not say this, nor does Roman, Greek, or Hebrew. Come to think of it, Norse doesn't either nor do any of the Native American groups I'm familiar with. The "alternate history" websites often make this blanket claim but then point to material that is demonstrably late in any civilization (the Greek idea of the "Golden Age", for instance, is NOT an early belief but one that arises after the Greek Dark Ages (not to be confused with the Medieval Dark Age.)

Could you cite a source or two showing myths/legends of an ancient intelligent civilization that you're talking about?

How intelligent we can only question. The knowledge of advanced math, geometry and astronomy continually
arise such as Gobekli Tepe said to be of astrological values..as is Stonehenge and many others said to be, and show them selves of this advanced knowledge.

So what are you calling "advanced math and geometry"? I'm married to a mathematician (as many here know) and I have a good idea of what advanced math looks like and a bit of familiarity with the history of math.

Finding academia to be unanswerable for certain questions and in direct conflict without others, the loop holes became evident and what knowledge I found from others works and thesis's where the simple number 13 led a consecutive transmission as a communicative language. Interesting how the letter M plays a part in math and artisans history as M numerically is 13.

I don't think you can substantiate this. Gematria arises only after 680 BC and the alphabet you cite was not the original alphabet used in determining letter values. In addition, the values originally used (that would have been in use during the time of the Ptolemies and the times that you appear to be referring to in much of your writing) are not the same as the table of associations you're using.

So if indeed ANY ancient was using this, they would only have been using this after 700 BC.... and they would not have used the version that you're using. The Modern English alphabet that you're using doesn't actually arise until after 1600 AD (and certainly would not have been available to ancients. If you go by the English alphabet prior to 1600, M is actually the 12th letter Abcdieries of ancient Greek also show that M is the 12th letter and the 7th (though this is unclear) in cuneiform.

When you understand the math of eight Imperial equates thirteen metric,,the Codex is simply undeniable as it is clear from our records - our past ancestors we have documented did not know of a math this advanced so could not have left this message...and yet it is right there.

When you began your explorations, you accepted as correct some sources that others gave you. You did not have the tools (research library, archaeological methods) to check their statements (such as that on the alphabet and letter values) and simply used their research.

In real research, you must check EVERY source to its beginning... including the difficult task of learning to read or recognize at least some of the language in the area you're researching. It's not impossible (I can read enough small fragments of many ancient languages to tell if someone's blowing smoke at me or if the translation given seems to be correct.)

However, you have a longer journey ahead.

...and then we will begin to discuss what "advanced mathematics and geometry" means. So far, you haven't shown anything beyond simple addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. No calculus, matrices, vectors, manifolds or the like.

a reply to: TerryDon79 & AdmireTheDistance
I am happy!
guess I picked up a new sense of humor together with a new year, that is great!

Ok maybe I overdid it with the concepts part, but meanings are the same. hear me out.

when it comes to spiritual or esoteric knowledge, meanings are way more important than the words that are used to described them. The words don't play a role here, one must read between the lines! Yes one word may change the meaning with time. But when you take a group of words and inspect what they are pointing to, this will not change.
What you two are doing here is looking at the trees and don't see the forest. As is the usual problem with interpretation of various spiritual scripts when one wants to understand them correctly. If you open up an old yoga book where astral travel or akashic records are explained. The words used for describing them are different when you compare it to Casey. But what they are saying is the same.

And to make an example from various religious sources, for instance:
www.theself.com...
The right side is important to what I am saying here. Those various sources from different religions were made in same cases even 1000 years or more apart and what they are pointing to is the same. Meanings are where the gold is, the words are just stones. Yet people are stuck on only words and are killing each other due to too shallow interpretation in the name of religion.

This was what I meant. I hope it is clear now and if it is still funny than so be it. I am a fun loving type after all : )


And another thing I was pondering about. Why is it important if they had a different metric system. If they had their own so what. That just means that with our current system for measurement the numbers are different but the ratios/formula stay the same. Currently there seems number 13 which is important to us in present time in this thread. But for their number system this was just a different number, but formula to calculate this number is the same. Math is universal language without time and it seems in this case they were counting on it if the codex is true.

originally posted by: UniFinity
when it comes to spiritual or esoteric knowledge, meanings are way more important than the words that are used to described them. The words don't play a role here, one must read between the lines! .

You are in the wrong forum, this forum is about the proven facts, not whatever you feel happy imagining to be the truth this week. You made a blanket statement that the Hall of Records has been around for thousands of years. you have failed to prove it, now do you have any actual evidence to support your claims or is it just going to be more unqualified waffle ?

a reply to: Marduk

fair enough, this is not metaphysical forum after all...

But I must admit that I was wrong about hall of records. From what he was saying this was an actual place and not something metaphysical. Maybe some day someone will indeed discover something around there under the ground. Wasn't there recently a thread about hidden rooms in some pyramid on ats. Who knows, maybe there is more hidden stuff underground around the Sphinx?

What I was talking about in my posts was something different, not connected with this place, but from where he supposedly got all information like about the healings for people and also from where he got the idea about hall of records itself.

Sorry for the confusion just wanted to make this clear. I will let myself out of here for now : )

interesting article I have discovered today. It is related to the age of the sphinx. But it was published in october 2015!

One of the most mysterious and enigmatic monuments on the surface of the planet is without a doubt the Great Sphinx at the Giza plateau in Egypt. It is an ancient construction that has baffled researchers ever since its discovery and until today, no one has been able to accurately date the Sphinx, since there are no written records or mentions in the past about it. Now, two Ukrainian researchers have proposed a new provocative theory where the two scientists propose that the Great Sphinx of Egypt is around 800,000 years old. A Revolutionary theory that is backed up by science.

The study was presented at the International Conference of Geoarchaeology and Archaeomineralogy held in Sofia titled: GEOLOGICAL ASPECT OF THE PROBLEM OF DATING THE GREAT EGYPTIAN SPHINX CONSTRUCTION.

more info:
www.ewao.com...


here is also their paper of the mentioned study in the snippet after googling the title.
mgu.bg...


any thoughts?
Their science and reasoning seems sound for an uneducated person like me. And it validates in a way what the OP is all about. There was a pre flood civilization if this happens to be true. But my bias is strong here and therefore I am a not objective...but, this almost sounds too good to be true : )

Is it?

..another complete disasterous thread...another fine example of the techniques of disinfo.

a reply to: UniFinity

I tend not to put a lot of stock in papers written by 1 scientists who is a nuclear geochemist who specializes in metal and another who I can find no peer reviewed work from. Particularly so when they do absolutely no field testing. They make wild assumptions such as that for the erosion they see, then Giza must have had a similar environment as we see today in the areas surrounding the black sea. Since the only time in history that occurred was roughly 750KA, then that's how old the Sphinx must be. They fail to explain why, when we see constant erosion of the sphinx in its current desert environment, how the sphinx survived 3/4 of a million years. Furthermore, they don't even look at any alternative hypothesis. They saw Schoch's work and ran wild with it. Their dating is pretty meaningless with no onsite field testing and used Russian literature written in the 60's as source material. There has been no research in this field in the last 60 years? One last thing, it's also not from October, 2015. It's from 2008. in over 7 years of collecting dust, nobody has corroborated this "data" That doesn't seem at all sketchy?