Is the First Lady actually the first, First Man?

a reply to: angeldoll
This doesn't deserve to be on this site at all. Not even LOL.

The fact this has received Flags disappoints me.

I did not know the First Lady is registered at ATS?

Although I'm not quite sure which member she is, since there is more than one person here with sand in their vagaygay.

a reply to: olaru12Got DNA proof on that? Hot DNA proof that Obama is Obamas bio son?
I will tell you what we do have. Obamas schoolmates stating Obama was full on Gay, and having sex with older white men who gave him coc aine. He hasnt sued his highschool mates for stating that either. Go figure. I imagine Michelle is female , but we dont know. I have researched this extensivly and did find one, only one picture of her as a girl in youth, none as a male. We dont know. We do know however, that his birth cert is a forgery. That is a given, except to sleeping fools

I'm with Joan Rivers...

Too much evidence.

And just how often do people die during minor elective surgery?

This is starting to sound way too familiar as well: Obama's 'Dead Pool'

People disputing this is over whelming proof to how dumb our country and society as a whole is becoming.

She's definitely swinging a hammer and built like a starting linebacker.

FYI, I dare you to try finding a REAL picture of "Michelle" pregnant...

The first video below gives a pretty convincing argument that the hands are not the hands of a woman.

BTW OP, what happened to your video links?

I too was never able to find info and pictures of Michelle being preggers

a reply to: madenusa

Damn, who knew medical science has advanced so much that men who want to be women can also have children!

Next time, do a search because you aren't the first to pick up on a deceased comedian's rantings and thought it was real. In fact, some thought she was murdered by Obama for those remarks but that's just stupid.

a reply to: madenusa
The only time I have ever felt empathy for Obama was after seeing the accusations and insults regarding his wife. It is in extremely poor taste to attack the lady, and I expect her husband would like to choke the life out of the bastards involved.

I don't agree that she's a he, it's a bit low to try that. Even if she was, big deal!

Rivers was a comedian who made money on begin offensive making many enemies along the way. I remember seeing her in person during a Holiday boat parade. She revived so many "boos" going by even back then in the 1980s.

Now her death that might be a conspiracy all it's own. Seems that her Dr. didn't like her too much probably didn't care too much for her probably coming out of surgery with the claimed "performing an unauthorized procedure" and linked to anyone else who supported her fatality, who knows.

a reply to: visitedbythem

...and? This proves what exactly?

Nothing? That would be correct.

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: madenusa

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: madenusa

Is the First Lady actually the first, First Man?

Why stop with the first lady...Obama has two daughters. Surely you can find something to criticize them for too; cooties or buggers perhaps.

Online searches for Malia and Sasha’s birth records come up dry.

We have seen pictures of Barack and Michelle dating back far before they had children, like shots from their wedding, but when it comes to what would have been Michelle’s child-bearing years, there is absolutely nothing.
Not one picture of her pregnant or with a newborn baby. I really just thought this was interesting I forgot how voters get.

Many years ago, social media wasn't quite what it is now, posting pics back in the early 2000's wasn't quite the fascination it is now. Just a thought. I am not sure, but I think I have one pic of my wife preggo with my second at my dad's wedding, but never posted online.

pic of Laura Bush, wife of President George W. Bush, holding their two-month-old twins, Jenna and Barbara.The youngest-looking pic of the girls I found (see below) was in an article extolling Michelle Obama, dated August 20, 2007, on the website Afrobella. The pic is undated. If we go by the date of the Afrobella article, Malia would be 9 years old and Sasha would be 6 years old.

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: madenusa

Is the First Lady actually the first, First Man?

Why stop with the first lady...Obama has two daughters. Surely you can find something to criticize them for too; cooties or buggers perhaps.

Nobody is going after the children. It is a legitimate question: why there are no birth certificates and birth records for Malia and Sasha Obama, while there such records for children of other presidents?
For example, media questioned, whether Sarah Palin’s youngest child is actually her daughter’s child, Sarah Palin produced his hospital birth certificate.
Media reported on adoption of McCain’s second daughter Bridget, on adoption of Romney’s grand children, on birth of two of Romney’s grand children by a surrogate, why not provide an explanation, why there are no birth records of Malia and Sasha Obama in national databases, while all the other records are there?
Im going to stop before its not funny lol .......Merry Christmas....

a reply to: madenusa

And why would they at all, have to pander to some misplaced idea that that's the public's business?

It's not.

If other people felt so inclined when bullied by the media to provide something that has nothing to do with anything, other than to satisfy the curious whims of the media..that's fine.

Just because they haven't doesn't mean that automatically whatever you think about them is true.



~Tenth

a reply to: seagull That we do not know if Michelle/Michael is male or female. We do not know if the children are even related to Obama. We do know however the statements made by school mates that Barack was fully Homosexual as a youth, and having sexual relations with older white men. Perhaps he met a powerful gay banker?

originally posted by: visitedbythem
I too was never able to find info and pictures of Michelle being preggers

From a former member of the First Lady’s personal staff.
He shall remain anonymous for the time being to protect his life as well as the lives of his family.Michelle Obama, First Lady of the United States, was born Michael LaVaughn Robinson in Chicago
google that name......

originally posted by: madenusa

originally posted by: visitedbythem
I too was never able to find info and pictures of Michelle being preggers

From a former member of the First Lady’s personal staff.
He shall remain anonymous for the time being to protect his life as well as the lives of his family.Michelle Obama, First Lady of the United States, was born Michael LaVaughn Robinson in Chicago
google that name......

I did. It got me this. And a good giggle. This 'theory' is in the correct forum. It's ludicrous.

originally posted by: Murgatroid
I'm with Joan Rivers...

Too much evidence.


BTW OP, what happened to your video links?

I had a lot more information ...
I had it posted on a different sight .....
I had a lot more links.....
The hole post went to shambles some one even posted Michelle is a member of ATS.
I just said heck with it.
The truth is a conspiracy theory
Happy Newyear!!!!

a reply to: madenusa

There is no evidence, there is just wild speculation. It's a load of absolute honk.

ludicrous online lies? Hoax Forum?
What happened to "Conspiracy Forum' and 'collaborative venue for free expression'? Seems lately more akin to 'guided discussions filtered and classified through our staff's arbitrary standards of validity'. Who decided this topic, or any other for that matter, was a 'ludicrous online lie' rather than the opinion of a contributor presented for discussion?
If I were going to open a bar, and make money from people coming to drink there, it would seem a little counterproductive to call my customers drunks or make them sit in the alcoholics section.

originally posted by: twitchy
ludicrous online lies? Hoax Forum?
What happened to "Conspiracy Forum' and 'collaborative venue for free expression'? Seems lately more akin to 'guided discussions filtered and classified through our staff's arbitrary standards of validity'. Who decided this topic, or any other for that matter, was a 'ludicrous online lie' rather than the opinion of a contributor presented for discussion?
If I were going to open a bar, and make money from people coming to drink there, it would seem a little counterproductive to call my customers drunks or make them sit in the alcoholics section.

]

Because moving it to the LOL forum means you can't discuss it?

a reply to: opethPA

Maybe some folks enjoy being told what information is valid and what isn't, critical thinking and intellectual babysitting are polar opposites in my opinion though. ATS wants quality contributions from conspiracy theorists, but doesn't trust them to decide for themselves what is valid or not? There is some evidence here to suggest that Michelle Obama is man, unless the staff member responsible for labeling this as a 'ludicrous online lie' has actually run their hand up his/her skirt to prove otherwise, then it's wrong to label this theory as anything but a theory.