It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Passerby1996
a reply to: Klassified
It's not only poverty I was talking about, though. There's also the huge variable of discrimination (against race, culture, religion, political allegiance, etc ...). Switzerland is probably the most "uniform" in terms of potential levels of discrimination. This means that there's not much to really discriminate against at all, hence the lack of any violent reprisals. They are also not a prime target for terrorists, as they don't contain many major cities whatsoever and don't make up a large amount of the global GDP.
Jamaica is completely different. While guns were banned, nothing else was done to quell the variables of poverty and discrimination. Thus, violence went through the roof. Political organizations were formed to combat anyone who disagreed with them, and they brought guns internationally to fight these opponents. It's an example of taking the starting leap into a race when the gun goes off (pun not intended), but not running the rest of the race.
But guns cannot do a damn thing by themselves. They need an operator.
In Paris, the citizens don't have guns like US. But there was still two major shootings there. California has very strict gun laws, but there was still a mass shooting there. All done by radical Muslims.
And before you bring gun control into this thread, answer this one question, what law would have prevented any of these recent shootings?
originally posted by: network dude
And before you bring gun control into this thread, answer this one question, what law would have prevented any of these recent shootings?
The government issues a gun to men for their mandatory military service, but the gun is taken home under "carefully controlled conditions without ammunition," said Mikton, the WHO officer who is also Swiss.
Swiss gun laws are more strict than the post implies, though less tough than some other European Union countries. Swiss law requires mandatory background checks on civilian handgun purchases and licenses for the concealed carry of weapons, and it bans automatic weapons.
While you're at it, explain Jamaica in the 70's. Also explain why crime is at a low in the U.S. right now?
NOW we'll see some action
350+ shootings this year so far, more than one per day. Of those, 99.99% were carried out by murderous nuts in wide variety, some were white and some black and some were other, some were Left and some were Right and some fit into neither category nor any other for that matter, some were certifiably crazy and were just a bit odd and some were stone cold sane, some were young, some were old, some were Christians, some were atheists, some had a grudge and others heard voices and some did it for God and still others just did it for the sport, some were loners and some were the life of the party, some made their intentions clear and others ... well, we'll never know the reason for their rampage.
And we did nothing.
No matter how horrific the slaughter, we did nothing. We rationalized. We raged. We ran around in circles waving our arms (and you can take that last however you like). We prayed and offered up empty platitudes, best wishes, our thoughts are with the victims boo hoo hoo. We clutched our guns tight, and damned the loons, the socialists, the commies, the gun grabbing Nazis, and that Obama. # happens we said, or more specially this kind of # happens every day in America. We don't know why and we don't know how to stop it and the only thing we're sure of is that daily mass shootings are a side effect of liberty. Praise Jesus and pass the ammunition.
But now?
Ah, now it looks like it was Muslims.
Finally, VINDICATION! At long last, that moment they warned us about! We're under attack! Oh they warned us, they did. Time to up armor, time to load out, we're gonna need a database and background checks and more goddamned guns! Boy oh boy, finally, here it is.
350 something incidents, one per day. Nothing. # happens. Price of freedom.
But now? NOW you'll see some goddamned action, you bet.
originally posted by: Passerby1996
a reply to: Klassified
It seems like that, but what I'm trying to say is that attempting to change a culture is much more difficult than trying to simply take away people's guns.
In other words, restricting gun ownership is the FIRST step. The next step is changing a society's violent tendencies.