It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
So much for asking nicely... It's always pulling teeth to get someone to back their claims up... Burden of Proof
Really, Krazyshot? That's a cheap shot and you know it.
You're better than such cheap shots. If you want to challenge/discuss/argue the conclusions of the many studies and/or experts who claim a link, you know I would have gladly done so. But suggesting no such link has ever been made and demanding links that you could have easily found yourself is just silly.
Although the medical community has been reluctant to acknowledge the link, induced abortion prior to a full term delivery, and prior to 32 weeks of gestation, increases the likelihood that a woman will develop breast cancer. This risk is especially increased for adolescents.
Linking these topics creates a great deal of emotion and debate. But scientific research studies have not found a cause-and-effect relationship between abortion and breast cancer.
"According to the National Advocates for Pregnant Women, prosecutors in South Carolina, one of the first states to introduce a fetal homicide law, have only charged one man under the legislation, and his case was subsequently dismissed. By contrast, as many as 300 South Carolina women have been arrested for their alleged actions against their unborn children during pregnancy."
"Women in states that don't have such laws on the books are still at risk of being charged with crimes against their fetuses, and rogue prosecutors can use their wide discretion to prosecute mothers with crimes beyond feticide or child abuse. In New York, for example, Jennifer Jorgensen is currently appealing her conviction of manslaughter in the death of the fetus she was carrying when she caused a car wreck that killed two other passengers in another vehicle. Jorgensen was acquitted of driving under the influence and manslaughter related to those deaths, but the manslaughter charge for the fetus inside her belly at the time of the crash (which died after an emergency C-section later) stuck.
www.vice.com..."
And yes your right, abortion laws take rights away from men. I think you want any irresponsible women to be able to change their mind and have an abortion after committing to starting a family with a man.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
not in the slightest! I think thats a responsible action
She admitted that she'd put the fetus in a dumpster, emphasizing that she'd thought it to be dead.
Patel stressed that she believed she'd been only two months pregnant at the time of her miscarriage, but expert witnesses at her trial estimated her gestation to be past Indiana's 20-week window for legal abortion.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
not in the slightest! I think thats a responsible action
You do know that the morning after pill makes the uterus uninhabitable for the fertilized egg that is on it's way there, right? The fertilized egg (if there is one) is just absorbed by the woman's body instead of being allowed to implant. So, it's "responsible" to deny that "baby" a place to grow, but it's murder to remove it from the uterus?
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
I find it some sort of amazing and hilarious that men keep discussing women's reproductive health care, like it's their business.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
I find it some sort of amazing and hilarious that men keep discussing women's reproductive health care, like it's their business.
Yeah! Especially Fundamental Christians.
I'm really tired of men telling women what's right for them, what they think, that there treated equal, etc.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
Should i be offended by this?
you keep trying to put me in a box, sorry its not going to work, im not a rubber stamp that will fit snugly into your ideas of conservatives or perceived idealism
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
so, tell me, is it possible to kill a baby while it's in the womb and also killing it by leaving it in the dumpster, because she was sentenced for both!! and what is the penalty for leaving a dead baby in a dumpster, compared to what she got? and well, just how many women would deliberately fall down the stairs to cause a miscarriage? or get into an auto accident with that intent? or decide that the best way to get rid of a pregnancy is to kill yourself???
sorry but.... no!
I've never heard about that link before, you brought it up though, so you needed to post the evidence for it. Don't get bitter about it because I ask you to source some links (again I asked politely at that).
So there isn't a consensus of this opinion. I guess we have some promising results so far (as evidenced by your first link) where this link may be the case, but you can't honestly say that this is a proven and accepted link yet.
Here's cancer.org on the matter
Oh, Lord! Offended again? That's entirely up to you. But I wouldn't be surprised if you were.
Not at all. I'm ASKING to get your position. Did you see the question marks??? I forget how sensitive you are! OK. I'll try to be more politically correct. Just for you.