Are the Mars Rovers actually in Canada?

It gets old thinking about how all the taxes we pay go to fund something that the rest of us will never be a part of. They only care about themselves.

To make war by way of deception, is not forcing
people to believe something they don't see.
The true craft is in the ability to guide/convince
people to believe something contrary to what
they do see.

anyone who actually believes that the mars probes are on devon island [ canada ] - is a fooking retard

there i said it

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
anyone who actually believes that the mars probes are on devon island [ canada ] - is a fooking retard
there i said it

Oh, is that so?

originally posted by: Blue Shift

Oh, is that so?

Dude are you kidding? That's not actually a plate of poutine, it's just pareidolia.

But in all seriousness the mars rovers are probably fake. NASA doesn't know how to get out of low earth orbit:

originally posted by: dreamfox1
You do know they are on earth right?


Nothing can get passed the radiation belts around earth without failing or plain just falling apart.

Not to mention the 'landing problems', that no parachute would solve (Mars' atmosphere is too thin), and so on.

I am not saying it's impossible to send a working rover to Mars, but Occam's Razor kind of dictates there has to be zillions of times easier solutions to get the same, questionable 'results'.. so why go through the trouble? Public will believe an edited photo of any deser to be of Mars, so why ACTUALLY go to Mars? There are so many problems, inconsistencies and impossibilities about all those Mars stories, that anyone honestly researching all this would have to at least raise an eyebrow.

How do you explain the countless other pictures Curiosity has sent back showing features that match the Martian surface, but don't exist anywhere on Devon Island?

Err, ALLEGEDLY sent.

How do you really know where those pics originally game from?

Also, in the current year (or even in the 1960s), it's pretty darn easy to manufacture 'false images'. In 1960s, they actually built a 'fake moon' with perfect features out of whatever Papier-mâché stuff they had available back then. Today, such faking possibilities are basically ENDLESS. You can't trust pictures or video in this era, sorry to say. They can create breathtakingly accurate and realistic sceneries without actually going or sending anything to ANOTHER PLANET.

When you use Occam's Razor... which seems more likely? The cheap, easy option, or the cumbersome, amazingly enormous and mega-expensive undertaking that no one can prove one way or another whether they did it or not..?

You SHOULD have some doubt about ANY official story, no matter how realistic, or how much you want to believe it. NASA is a massive money black hole, and always has been. I am not going into what they did to murder astronauts and whistleblowers back in the day, but there's a REASON why people called it 'Never A Straight Answer' even back in the day. Also, remember that it was basically formed and staffed by "ex"-nazís.

They have 'cleaned' their image since then, but we shouldn't forget these 'little details' so quickly and start trusting anything they say without any proof.