It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The French defence minister, Jean-Yves Le Drian, formally requested help from his country’s EU partners, the first time the mutual assistance article in the EU treaty has been invoked. This before France launched a fresh round of strikes on the Isis stronghold Raqqa in Syria.
As the EU does not have an army, the French will now conduct a set of bilateral negotiations with other EU states on what kind of military help might be available.
Mr. Hollande called for quick action by Parliament on new legislation that would give the government more flexibility to conduct police raids without a warrant and place people under house arrest. He said he would seek court advice on broader surveillance powers. And he called for amendments that would enable the state to take exceptional security measures without having to resort to the most drastic options currently in the Constitution.
“Terrorism will not destroy the republic, because it is the republic that will destroy it” he said.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Not surprising. I mean here in America, we have right wingers baying to take away civil rights from some people who haven't done anything.
Well its how you guys ended up with such wonderful gems as the patriot act and the TSA
To avoid the options provided with the Constitution we get some new police-state laws in France? How is that even remotely possible? Can anybody explain this to me, please?
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Not surprising. I mean here in America, we have right wingers baying to take away civil rights from some people who haven't done anything.
Well its how you guys ended up with such wonderful gems as the patriot act and the TSA
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Not surprising. I mean here in America, we have right wingers baying to take away civil rights from some people who haven't done anything.
originally posted by: SergeantSmoke
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Not surprising. I mean here in America, we have right wingers baying to take away civil rights from some people who haven't done anything.
Would you mind elaborating?
originally posted by: stuthealien
i welcome this as there has been a double standard to date where radicals have been allowed to
run around spouting **hit ,they made there choice time to level the playing field.
instead of one law for one group and complete freedom to the others.
originally posted by: seagull
I hesitate to call it over reaction, but can't say I'm real thrilled with the level of "security" measures being taken.
Fear makes people accept amazingly stupid things in the name of security...
originally posted by: Revolution9
a reply to: PublicOpinion
France's Patriot Act!
Wow, the revolutionary French are being brought under the thumb just like U.S and UK.
Is it not clear that radical Islam terror is being used as an excuse for draconian laws that give the state historically unheard of powers over the individual? Is it necessary? Is it fair that we should be sabotaged like this? Is the state taking complete advantage of this and even possibly manufacturing terror for increased power and control and to justify its power and existence continually?
Je crains que nous sommes baisée.
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Not surprising. I mean here in America, we have right wingers baying to take away civil rights from some people who haven't done anything.
Just like the left wingers baying to take away the constitutional right to keep and bear arms from tens of millions of people who haven't done anything.
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: PublicOpinion
To avoid the options provided with the Constitution we get some new police-state laws in France? How is that even remotely possible? Can anybody explain this to me, please?
Quite honestly I'm confused about why you are confused. They are traumatized. They want to protect themselves.
They are not trying to harm one another. They are trying to prevent harm.
originally posted by: SergeantSmoke
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Not surprising. I mean here in America, we have right wingers baying to take away civil rights from some people who haven't done anything.
Would you mind elaborating?