It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TrueAmerican
a reply to: eNumbra
I never said he'd win against the cops with a 12 gauge. But if you are going to die anyways because the cops can't wait 5 hours to approach a judge for a warrant (who may have well denied it, because of lack of probable cause)- then by George I say take as many as you can with you. The guy's dead either way. But it cost no cop his life, and it damn well should have. At least one, if not two or three. I would have cheered had this story ended up instead with the title:
"Man kills three cops defending his home against their illegal home invasion- and is acquitted."
Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: infolurker
I'm guessing there won't be any rioting in North Carolina? Why not? This isn't a vague racist remark. This is a serious question. WHY NOT?!
Why are white communities so docile when it comes to allowing themselves to be abused? I always hear of how black communities are "bad" because they react to injustices but that's how it should be. When police do this, it needs to cost the city money. Every time. Eventually, the folks in charge will realize that it's far more cost-effective to promote better training and stricter punishment for cops than to defend them in court all the time.
White folks don't riot, we vote, we contact our representatives in congress, we write letters to the local paper. There may be more than a few that will do more, but most of us are working and trying to make a living and pay the bills.
SPRING LAKE, N.C. (WNCN) – The Harnett County Sheriff’s Office has released the name of the deputy involved in Sunday morning’s fatal officer-involved shooting in Spring Lake.
Harnett County Sheriff’s Deputy Nicholas Kehagias was involved in the shooting incident, according to Maj. Jeff Huber. Kehagias has been employed as a deputy sheriff since July 2013 and is currently assigned to the patrol division.
Are you condeming the man for doing something like that in his own house where the cop had no buisseness being there? You call that a fight?
originally posted by: schuyler
Witnesses said Livingston was not fighting back and was trying to get the Taser out of the deputy’s hands.
So which was it?
He was "not fighting back" is contradicted by "and was trying to get the Taser out of the deputy's hands."
originally posted by: DuckforcoveR
Shouldn't matter!! No warrant, period. End of story. I'm sick and tired of the constitution only mattering when somebody says anything about guns.
The 4th part (which yes, comes after #2) speaks of unreasonable searches. No warrant, no f'n entry. Pretty cut and dry to me 😠
a reply to: schuyler
originally posted by: smirkley
Was it so hard to say "how can I help you officer?".
And after the officer says I am looking for so and do, just say "No, I live here, here is my ID."
Yes, that was probably too hard.
originally posted by: everyone
Are you condeming the man for doing something like that in his own house where the cop had no buisseness being there? You call that a fight?
originally posted by: schuyler
Witnesses said Livingston was not fighting back and was trying to get the Taser out of the deputy’s hands.
So which was it?
He was "not fighting back" is contradicted by "and was trying to get the Taser out of the deputy's hands."
The cop should not have been in there in the first place, the cop was the tresspasser and you try to bring this up as a argument?
originally posted by: stolencar18
Allow me to correct your message...
You THINK the cop should not have been there, because some nearby biased witnesses said so.