It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bjarneorn
originally posted by: nwtrucker
Meanwhile over 100 dead in Paris from Muslims. No "war crime" there, eh? But, Israel, EVIL....change your meds...
Well, I don't think anyone is willing to take your meds ... certainly hope not.
War, in and by itself, is terrorism. Did you know, that 500 thousand children died in Iraq, as a result of US warfare against it. What do you call that, a good beginning or something.
You think "hating muslims" is ok ... because they're not jews. Hating muslims, is just as wrong as hating jews. Targeting muslims, is just as wrong as targeting jews.
The crime in france, is not done by muslims ... it's done by a few sick people. Maybe they do it, because they're insane with grief. But it's a crime, not an act of war. And should be treated, as a crime, not as war. Such an act, is not a blank check, to go and visit horrors on the middle east.
This 9/11 reaction of "hatred" is NOT what we need.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
Might as well use the warrant for toilet paper. It's about as enforceable as an arrest warrant from judge judy.
A Spanish court has found Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and six other senior officials guilty of crimes against humanity for their role in the 2010 raid on Gaza-bound aid ship, Mavi Marmara.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: Xcathdra
They were tried in absentia for crimes against humanity.
So exactly where and when was that trial done? Which judge presided over it and who was the prosecutor?
Los hechos se tipificaron como delito de lesa humanidad, detención ilegal, deportación y tortura y delito contra las personas y bienes protegidos en caso de conflicto armado (crímenes de guerra)
el juez pone en conocimiento de las fuerzas de seguridad del Estado que deberán comunicar a su juzgado "la posible presencia en territorio español de las personas contra las que se dirige la querella"
[..]
De la Mata comunica a las fuerzas de seguridad los nombres de los siete, después de que en el auto de archivo ordenara la reapertura de la causa en el caso de que estas personas se encuentren en territorio español, ya que en entonces sí se podría aplicar la justicia universal.
originally posted by: voyger2
a reply to: reldra
This is very important to include and sustain already two file cases of Israel War crimes ongoing at ICC.
Palestine joined the ICC in April and already handed over two files documenting alleged Israeli crimes to the court. The first file contained facts about the 2014 Israeli Operation Protective Edge in the Gaza Strip which killed more than 2,000 Palestinians. The other one dealt with Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Palestinians file new evidence of Israeli ‘war crimes’ to International Criminal Court
originally posted by: voyger2
Basically the judge demands that police authorities give him notice if anyone of the accused put's is feet in spain, to re-open the case.
originally posted by: VictorVonDoom Put a big enough bounty on his head and someone will try to collect.
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: 23432
Im sorry but didnt they find weapons in that shipment they boarded? So technically anyone on board could had been found to be in violation of th e law and if killed during th e raid their families ar e legally screwed due to them doing something illegal correct?
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: 23432
Im sorry but didnt they find weapons in that shipment they boarded? So technically anyone on board could had been found to be in violation of th e law and if killed during th e raid their families ar e legally screwed due to them doing something illegal correct?
originally posted by: Jahari
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: 23432
Im sorry but didnt they find weapons in that shipment they boarded? So technically anyone on board could had been found to be in violation of th e law and if killed during th e raid their families ar e legally screwed due to them doing something illegal correct?
I doubt it. If I'm on a boat being assaulted by commandos and I know I have a cache of weapons in storage I think I'd ditch the sling shots and grab a AK.
Secondly, shouldn't the rules of engagement be followed in a situation like that. Yes I'd want to know who and what was on that boat if I were Isreal. But not once did they come under fire. They showed a blatant disregard for the human lives on board that ship. I'm disgusting at some of you people trying to defend this.