It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Why should anyone believe what Obama released is his actual birth certificate?
Why are you begging the question, this birther nonsense is just that, nonsense.
The live birth cert is out, if you don't like it then that is on you.
It's not that I don't like it. I don't like that the media did not vet the birth certificate controversy. They buried it. And I know that their actions ultimately protected Obama from a scandal involving a fraudulent identification document.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: reldra
People don't care, if they can't see them then they must be sealed for nefarious reasons because Obama.
Apparently they don't care about confidentially laws... Ironic if you ask me.
Here's what's ironic: Hawaii's open records law (Uniform Information Practices Act) mandates that Obama's birth certificate be made public BY THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (not the White House) under several statutes and pursuant to case law. The very least of which is case law law stating that because his birth certificate has *ahem* been made public by Obama already, it is disclosable by the agency, under the UIPA. As the Hawaii Office of Information Practices found, once a record has been released you cannot unring that bell, therefore the record is public.
But the agency has violated several statutes to keep it private.
Why should anyone believe what Obama released is his actual birth certificate?
You can't be serious?
Why can't I?
The Hawaii Dept of Health did verify and release Obama's birth certificate in 2011. You missed that I take it?
Here's what you missed:
I personally wrote an open records request to the Hawaii Department of Health, in late 2010, and received a response proving that Obama's short form Certificate of Live BIrth, photographed by Factcheck.org, is fraudulent.
The other day you doubted that I had found Obama's uncle installed core banking systems across the globe, for three decades, for an organization at the center of a banking spy scandal involving the Bushes, Clintons, and the PROMIS computer program used by our government for illegal spying. I said I wished someone in the media vetted that story.
Then I proved it to you with Obama's uncle's own personal website that was taken down in 2004.
I can prove this, too.
1) What response did you receive from them?
2) I have no idea what you are talking about in regard to 'core banking systems' ? A website of his uncle's?
You should probably take a break.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Can I ask a serious question?
What would Carson have gained by making up a fake test at Yale?
I don't like the guy, I think he is a panderer...
But there comes a time where a scandal is more of an anecdote of no significance at all...
This is an anecdote of no significance at all.
Murdoch + "Journalism" - Truth = News.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Why should anyone believe what Obama released is his actual birth certificate?
Why are you begging the question, this birther nonsense is just that, nonsense.
The live birth cert is out, if you don't like it then that is on you.
It's not that I don't like it. I don't like that the media did not vet the birth certificate controversy. They buried it. And I know that their actions ultimately protected Obama from a scandal involving a fraudulent identification document.
Bury it? It was like the Neverending Story.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: reldra
People don't care, if they can't see them then they must be sealed for nefarious reasons because Obama.
Apparently they don't care about confidentially laws... Ironic if you ask me.
Here's what's ironic: Hawaii's open records law (Uniform Information Practices Act) mandates that Obama's birth certificate be made public BY THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (not the White House) under several statutes and pursuant to case law. The very least of which is case law law stating that because his birth certificate has *ahem* been made public by Obama already, it is disclosable by the agency, under the UIPA. As the Hawaii Office of Information Practices found, once a record has been released you cannot unring that bell, therefore the record is public.
But the agency has violated several statutes to keep it private.
Why should anyone believe what Obama released is his actual birth certificate?
You can't be serious?
Why can't I?
The Hawaii Dept of Health did verify and release Obama's birth certificate in 2011. You missed that I take it?
Here's what you missed:
I personally wrote an open records request to the Hawaii Department of Health, in late 2010, and received a response proving that Obama's short form Certificate of Live BIrth, photographed by Factcheck.org, is fraudulent.
The other day you doubted that I had found Obama's uncle installed core banking systems across the globe, for three decades, for an organization at the center of a banking spy scandal involving the Bushes, Clintons, and the PROMIS computer program used by our government for illegal spying. I said I wished someone in the media vetted that story.
Then I proved it to you with Obama's uncle's own personal website that was taken down in 2004.
I can prove this, too.
1) What response did you receive from them?
2) I have no idea what you are talking about in regard to 'core banking systems' ? A website of his uncle's?
You should probably take a break.
No, you should probably take a break if you cannot recall this from a few days ago, because I can:
Link
I will be happy to share with you the information I uncovered. I will be back in a bit when I have enough time to put it together for you.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: reldra
People don't care, if they can't see them then they must be sealed for nefarious reasons because Obama.
Apparently they don't care about confidentially laws... Ironic if you ask me.
Here's what's ironic: Hawaii's open records law (Uniform Information Practices Act) mandates that Obama's birth certificate be made public BY THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (not the White House) under several statutes and pursuant to case law. The very least of which is case law law stating that because his birth certificate has *ahem* been made public by Obama already, it is disclosable by the agency, under the UIPA. As the Hawaii Office of Information Practices found, once a record has been released you cannot unring that bell, therefore the record is public.
But the agency has violated several statutes to keep it private.
Why should anyone believe what Obama released is his actual birth certificate?
You can't be serious?
Why can't I?
The Hawaii Dept of Health did verify and release Obama's birth certificate in 2011. You missed that I take it?
Here's what you missed:
I personally wrote an open records request to the Hawaii Department of Health, in late 2010, and received a response proving that Obama's short form Certificate of Live BIrth, photographed by Factcheck.org, is fraudulent.
The other day you doubted that I had found Obama's uncle installed core banking systems across the globe, for three decades, for an organization at the center of a banking spy scandal involving the Bushes, Clintons, and the PROMIS computer program used by our government for illegal spying. I said I wished someone in the media vetted that story.
Then I proved it to you with Obama's uncle's own personal website that was taken down in 2004.
I can prove this, too.
1) What response did you receive from them?
2) I have no idea what you are talking about in regard to 'core banking systems' ? A website of his uncle's?
You should probably take a break.
No, you should probably take a break if you cannot recall this from a few days ago, because I can:
Link
I will be happy to share with you the information I uncovered. I will be back in a bit when I have enough time to put it together for you.
You first said Bush/CIA drug running and I wasn't online for your response. You should probably write a book if you are privy to such deep info.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: reldra
People don't care, if they can't see them then they must be sealed for nefarious reasons because Obama.
Apparently they don't care about confidentially laws... Ironic if you ask me.
Here's what's ironic: Hawaii's open records law (Uniform Information Practices Act) mandates that Obama's birth certificate be made public BY THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (not the White House) under several statutes and pursuant to case law. The very least of which is case law law stating that because his birth certificate has *ahem* been made public by Obama already, it is disclosable by the agency, under the UIPA. As the Hawaii Office of Information Practices found, once a record has been released you cannot unring that bell, therefore the record is public.
But the agency has violated several statutes to keep it private.
Why should anyone believe what Obama released is his actual birth certificate?
You can't be serious?
Why can't I?
The Hawaii Dept of Health did verify and release Obama's birth certificate in 2011. You missed that I take it?
Here's what you missed:
I personally wrote an open records request to the Hawaii Department of Health, in late 2010, and received a response proving that Obama's short form Certificate of Live BIrth, photographed by Factcheck.org, is fraudulent.
The other day you doubted that I had found Obama's uncle installed core banking systems across the globe, for three decades, for an organization at the center of a banking spy scandal involving the Bushes, Clintons, and the PROMIS computer program used by our government for illegal spying. I said I wished someone in the media vetted that story.
Then I proved it to you with Obama's uncle's own personal website that was taken down in 2004.
I can prove this, too.
1) What response did you receive from them?
2) I have no idea what you are talking about in regard to 'core banking systems' ? A website of his uncle's?
You should probably take a break.
No, you should probably take a break if you cannot recall this from a few days ago, because I can:
Link
I will be happy to share with you the information I uncovered. I will be back in a bit when I have enough time to put it together for you.
You should probably write a book if you are privy to such deep info.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
If I'm not mistaken, it was a self-deprecating story from his book...which was delivered within the context of him really hurting for spending money while at school...so much so, that he was willing to take an additional test in order to win the $10 prize.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: reldra
People don't care, if they can't see them then they must be sealed for nefarious reasons because Obama.
Apparently they don't care about confidentially laws... Ironic if you ask me.
Here's what's ironic: Hawaii's open records law (Uniform Information Practices Act) mandates that Obama's birth certificate be made public BY THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (not the White House) under several statutes and pursuant to case law. The very least of which is case law law stating that because his birth certificate has *ahem* been made public by Obama already, it is disclosable by the agency, under the UIPA. As the Hawaii Office of Information Practices found, once a record has been released you cannot unring that bell, therefore the record is public.
But the agency has violated several statutes to keep it private.
Why should anyone believe what Obama released is his actual birth certificate?
You can't be serious?
Why can't I?
The Hawaii Dept of Health did verify and release Obama's birth certificate in 2011. You missed that I take it?
Here's what you missed:
I personally wrote an open records request to the Hawaii Department of Health, in late 2010, and received a response proving that Obama's short form Certificate of Live BIrth, photographed by Factcheck.org, is fraudulent.
The other day you doubted that I had found Obama's uncle installed core banking systems across the globe, for three decades, for an organization at the center of a banking spy scandal involving the Bushes, Clintons, and the PROMIS computer program used by our government for illegal spying. I said I wished someone in the media vetted that story.
Then I proved it to you with Obama's uncle's own personal website that was taken down in 2004.
I can prove this, too.
1) What response did you receive from them?
2) I have no idea what you are talking about in regard to 'core banking systems' ? A website of his uncle's?
You should probably take a break.
No, you should probably take a break if you cannot recall this from a few days ago, because I can:
Link
I will be happy to share with you the information I uncovered. I will be back in a bit when I have enough time to put it together for you.
You first said Bush/CIA drug running and I wasn't online for your response. You should probably write a book if you are privy to such deep info.
Yes that, too. I assumed you would remember details other than the Bush/CIA connection to Obama. But you may have selective partisan memory.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Good. That's what vetting is about. Finding the truth. Just because Carson told the truth, doesn't mean the vetting was uncalled for. And there will be plenty more where that came from.
Carson is running for president. He better get his big boy pants out right now and be ready for questions about his personal life and his past. It's part of the job.
originally posted by: TheBulk
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Good. That's what vetting is about. Finding the truth. Just because Carson told the truth, doesn't mean the vetting was uncalled for. And there will be plenty more where that came from.
Carson is running for president. He better get his big boy pants out right now and be ready for questions about his personal life and his past. It's part of the job.
Of course this same standard was not held and is not currently held to Barack Obama.
Just 7 percent of journalists are Republicans. That’s far fewer than even a decade ago.
originally posted by: reldra
1) What response did you receive from them?
HAR§11-1-2 – Seal of the department of health.
(b) The official seal of the department of health shall be embossed near the signature of the director of health to verify commissions of appointment of deputy directors and notaries public, certificates, and other formal official documents on which the official seal has been customarily used or is appropriate to be used, as the director of health may determine on a case-by-case basis.
Hawaii Public Health Regulations, Chapter 8b
2.4 Issuance of Certified Copies of Vital Records
B. Standards for Copies of Vital Records
(1) Standard Copy
(b) Form of certification. Standard certified copies shall contain an appropriate certification statement over the signature of the registrar having custody of the record and be impressed with the raised seal of the issuing office. The signature may be photographed or entered by mechanical means. The paper shall display the official seal of the Department of Health or the seal of the State.
[AND]
(2) Abbreviated Copy
(b) Form of certification. This will be the same as for a standard certified copy.
“The Hawaii Department of Health receives about a dozen e-mail inquiries a day about Obama’s birth certificate, spokesman Okubo said.
“I guess the big issue that’s being raised is the lack of an embossed seal and a signature,” Okubo said, pointing out that in Hawaii, both those things are on the back of the document. “Because they scanned the front … you wouldn’t see those things.”
Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.
And about the copy we e-mailed her for verification? “When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it.“
Still, she acknowledges: “I don’t know that it’s possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."
“In the State of Hawaii all certified copies of certificates of live birth have the embossed seal and registrar signature on the back of the document.”
"I spoke to Ms. Okubo late Wednesday afternoon, and she said she had seen the version of Obama’s certificate of live birth posted on the sites. While her office cannot verify the information on a form without the permission of the certificate holder (Obama), she said “the form is exactly the same” and it has “all the components of a birth certificate” record issued by the state. In other words, she sees no reason to think the version posted on Obama’s web site and Daily Kos is not genuine.
The “embossed seal” in question is, she said, probably on the back of the document provided to Daily Kos, but not visible (as in another certificate posted on Israel Insider for contrast). She thinks the difference in visibility can be attributed to the pressure used when applying the seal."
***
***
In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet. That birth certificate can be seen here (PDF).
We asked the Obama campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007, because that’s when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that document and “all the records we could get our hands on” according to spokesperson Shauna Daly. The campaign didn’t release its copy until 2008, after speculation began to appear on the Internet questioning Obama’s citizenship.
***