Salt Water Powered Cars for the Masses And Other Uses For This Amazing Technology!

So here we have some cars that run on salt water and cost about the same as any new cars do. Pretty interesting stuff!
I will be talking more about this technology as well as similar technology that may aid our energy needs!


A Salt Water Powered Car for the Masses. $30,000 600 mile range. LEGIT!


A Super Car that runs on Salt Water: QUANT e-sportlimousine

a reply to: FormOfTheLord

The portable generator that runs on water is a hoax.

I don't know. Aren't we expecting more water shortages? And if they plan to use sea water, how long would it take to drain the oceans, or at least diminish them significantly? It's a great technology though, but I suspect like most everything else comes consequences.

a reply to: angeldoll

Depends on what comes out the back.

if the exhaust is water vapor....

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: angeldoll

Depends on what comes out the back.

Sorry. I don't understand what you're saying. Exhaust?

a reply to: angeldoll

sorry bout that.

yes the exhaust.

a reply to: FormOfTheLord

If the technology works expect it to be shelved or never come to fruition considering the dependency TPTB require us to have on any and all fossil and oil based fuels.

Just do it
second
But does the base trim come with a mermaid?

a reply to: andy06shake

Or tech like this is finally allowed to see the light of day because the fossil fuel bigwigs know we're way past peak oil

a reply to: InspectorGadget13

Well that's hardly synonymous with TPTB stranglehold on humanity regarding oil and/or associated products. There is plenty fossil fuels left to be had, just harder to get to hence more expensive to the end user aka Joe Public.

originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
So here we have some cars that run on salt water...

The problem, of course, being that salt water has no fuel value, so it's a lie.

Next.

eta: Here is the nature of the thing under the hype.

The first cite is for the "aetherforce" car. That is total bollocks. It's one of Eric Dollard's scalar-zero point-free energy dope dreams. The end.

The second is for Quant's flow battery. They're not telling you the whole story. Flow batteries are cool things that are very tough to make work. It's like a fuel cell mated with a battery. Very nice possibilities that no one much has got anything out of as a production item.

However, it's not something you just dump sea water into and away you go.

THAT part is a lie.

Flow cells have two liquid electrolytes, or one liquid and one gaseous. Some chemistries work with one of the electrolytes contributing sodium ions. But you're going to have another tank of something else, like a vanadium solution, and when you're done with the fuel, you have a tank of mixed up crap like vanadium contaminated saltwater. You then have to return THAT to the reprocessing center for separation and recharging, and THAT step takes like 140% of the energy you can get back out of it.

So no matter what you use for a flow cell chemistry, you start with two different goops and end up with one waste goop (usually), sometimes two different waste goops. You then have to recharge the waste goop. And you're going to lose 30-50% in doing that. You want to run the numbers on it, if you look at the energy used in the form of petroleum a year by motor vehicles, you're going to find that running the US motor fleet from electric power, you're going to have to build hundreds of new plants to do it.

So bascily, you just licked water out of the energy equation...
Like, waterpower plants, watermills, no fuel value huu...
Im not saying THIS topic ISNT a lie...
Just that you might be wrong Bedlam....

originally posted by: Miccey
So bascily, you just licked water out of the energy equation...
Like, waterpower plants, watermills, no fuel value huu...
Im not saying THIS topic ISNT a lie...
Just that you might be wrong Bedlam....

No. Water has no fuel value.

Hydro plants don't burn water. You get the energy from a drop in altitude. Not going to have that in a car.

The sun evaporates water, it falls as rain at higher altitude, flows down to your dam, and you use the head to generate power by turning a turbine. Easy peasy. But at no point do you "burn" water. It's just a convenient way to get solar energy, if you want to look at it that way.

originally posted by: Bedlam

You get the energy from a drop in altitude. Not going to have that in a car.

If you drop if from a helicopter it will go 90MPH with NO fuel in the vehicle.

Free energy!!!!

Realize that the title of this thread is completely misleading, as are the videos (not to mention very old).

The cars are NOT SALT WATER POWERED.

One does not use these cars by filling up a tank with salt water and going like you would gasoline. The salt water is used as a storage medium for electricity.

It is electricity that still has to power the car, and has to be generated by something else that you charge the car up with.

So, NO. There is not a car that you fill up with water or salt water, turn the key and go. That's a out right lie.

Seeing how how easy people are tricked, it's a wonder that there are not still Snake Oil sales people out there getting rich by selling their bottles of "Wonder Cure - Will Cure Anything!" out there.......

The saltwater is just a catalyst for the static charge. Just like rainclouds. Water vapor hits thermalgnetic plasma in atmosphere, the plasma "tubes" (yeah they're not tubes) collect enough vapor until it turns liquid. Thunder and lightning are just the result of enceinte "clouds" and plasmas clashing in the Earth's electromagnetic sphere and creating static.

The upgraded version for free-ish energy's key lies within the entanglement of thermalmagnetic plasma and geo-electromagnetic forces and a specific technique in harnessing them for energy. When dealing with this type of plasma, there's a very deliberate use in the word "harness".

I really don't think you folks get it. The writing is on the wall.

There is very deliberate intent in the words they chose to use with this company and product. "Aetherforce", "Living", "Open", and "Quarantino", are the queues that make this a dead giveaway.

... Until I can get a white paper on how it works, and see it work, it might as well be a concept invention- like a phone that drives your car, or a toilet that makes sandwiches and sends email

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: Miccey
So bascily, you just licked water out of the energy equation...
Like, waterpower plants, watermills, no fuel value huu...
Im not saying THIS topic ISNT a lie...
Just that you might be wrong Bedlam....

No. Water has no fuel value.

Hydro plants don't burn water. You get the energy from a drop in altitude. Not going to have that in a car.

The sun evaporates water, it falls as rain at higher altitude, flows down to your dam, and you use the head to generate power by turning a turbine. Easy peasy. But at no point do you "burn" water. It's just a convenient way to get solar energy, if you want to look at it that way.

So to be defined as "Fuel" it HAS to burn???
Hmmm

originally posted by: Miccey

So to be defined as "Fuel" it HAS to burn???
Hmmm

That would be the definition:

1fuel
noun, fu·el often attributive ˈfyü(-ə)l

: a material (such as coal, oil, or gas) that is burned to produce heat or power

: something that gives support or strength to something (such as argument or angry feelings)