It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I commended that poster for their stance because it takes balls to question accepted reality. How is that a back peddle?
Almost everyone believes the earth to be spherical but only a tiny portion of people even know why.
Regurgitating "facts" to pass test does not make you intelligent.
originally posted by: SynchronousSnake
a reply to: spygeek
what You suggest about such a task is ludicrous and only appeals to the argument that it's to big to fail
originally posted by: NihilistSanta
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Are you serious? They probably spend millions testing water all the time. People get sick from water consumption daily. People have over dosed on water and it kills them. Nice try though.
originally posted by: NihilistSanta
This is one explanation from one of the more prominent proponents. (mods please note this member was banned from ATS so I am not sure if we can link his vids). He says it is a matter of scale, perspective and sight lines. There are models of the FE that show the sun and moon revolving around the earth and the sun works like a flashlight projecting its light on the earth. FE theorist say the reason it appears to set is that it has merely moved from your line of sight.
originally posted by: SynchronousSnake
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: SynchronousSnake
a reply to: GetHyped
gtfo. gopro's have a fish eye lens
But you can see farther over the horizon the higher up you go. A ship that was invisible over the horizon will come into view as you go up in a balloon. Why would that happen on a flat Earth?
Why?Gravity.. Has it not be proven that the closer to the source of gravity (earth in this case) that light bends? Every thing you see is dependent on seeing light. If it bends with gravity over distance this is what gives that effect.
originally posted by: SynchronousSnake
a reply to: OccamsRazor04where in there theory of mass having gravity does it state that massive objects HAVE to be round?
originally posted by: SynchronousSnake
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
and like i posted. the sun could not possibly be responsible for formation of our planet because it's not really 92.96 million miles away. the time lag of the gravity of earth is used to inflate this distance when it is much closer and much smaller then the current popular theory states
originally posted by: SynchronousSnake
a reply to: OccamsRazor04where in there theory of mass having gravity does it state that massive objects HAVE to be round?
One of the effects of mass is that it attracts other mass. For small objects, like your computer, your car, and even a building, the force of gravity is tiny. But when you have millions, and even trillions of tonnes of mass, the effect of the gravity really builds up. All of the mass pulls on all the other mass, and it tries to create the most efficient shape… a sphere.
Over time, all of this material, thanks to gravity - which is a function of mass - would’ve pulled this material slowly together. It would have accreted - or got together - and slowly would’ve built up planetessimals, miniature planets, and then they grew to make big planets as they hoovered up - under increasingly powerful gravitational fields - the rest of that residual material.
Because gravity is pulling things together, everything that’s being attracted wants to get us close to everything else as it can. The most effective way for that to happen is if objects are spherical.