It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An email blast about the class says it's aimed at people of color and of all sexualities, ages, body sizes, abilities, genders, and experience with yoga. It specifically identifies "lesbian, bisexual, gay, queer and trans-friendly/affirming," plus people who self-identify as "African American/black/of the African Diaspora, Asian, South Asian, West Asian/Arab/Middle Eastern, Pacific Islander, First Nations/Alaskan Native/Native American/Indigenous, Chican/Latin, or Multiracial/Mixed-Race." The email adds that "white friends, allies and partners are respectfully asked not to attend."
Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson previously told Dori that his office would go after any business that discriminates against a specific group of people. Dori wants to know if Ferguson will stick to his word.
"Now we're gonna find out if my instincts about the attorney general and about our state government [are right] — using the power of government to go after the Christian florist in the Tri-Cities who didn't want to do the gay wedding ceremony. Will they also go after the yoga studio that discriminates against people based on their skin color?" he said.
originally posted by: intrepid
My personal opinion.....whatever. Hey, maybe they have a lot of rhythmic exercises. Let's face it, we dance worse. The only Black dude I've seen with no rhythm is Bill Cosby.
originally posted by: intrepid
My personal opinion.....whatever. Hey, maybe they have a lot of rhythmic exercises. Let's face it, we dance worse. The only Black dude I've seen with no rhythm is Bill Cosby.
originally posted by: johnwick
a reply to: interupt42
Ya... I read this earlier...will the AG let it stand though, because it is unconstitutional to allow this but force the florist or baker whichever it was to do the gay wedding.
Personally, i think it should be legal, and the baker should be able to deny service to anyone he wants to.
But im into freedom
Merica!!!!
originally posted by: johnwick
a reply to: interupt42
Ya... I read this earlier...will the AG let it stand though, because it is unconstitutional to allow this but force the florist or baker whichever it was to do the gay wedding.
Personally, i think it should be legal, and the baker should be able to deny service to anyone he wants to.
But im into freedom
Merica!!!!
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: johnwick
a reply to: interupt42
Ya... I read this earlier...will the AG let it stand though, because it is unconstitutional to allow this but force the florist or baker whichever it was to do the gay wedding.
Personally, i think it should be legal, and the baker should be able to deny service to anyone he wants to.
But im into freedom
Merica!!!!
Really? Still? Sorry but I think all the Whaaaambulances are busy at this time. May I offer some cheese to go with that whine? My point? What's your point?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: ~Lucidity
I think the political side is to see what the answer will be to the question: "will antidescrimination policies be applied across all spectrums, or is the average white person allowed to be discriminated against?"
Obviously straight Caucasians who want to do yoga with alternate lifestyle yoga enthusiasts and minorities care...