It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Founders never intended to create an unregulated individual right to a gun. Today, millions believe they did. Here’s how it happened.
The Second Amendment consists of just one sentence: “A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
Many are startled to learn that the U.S. Supreme Court didn’t rule that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual’s right to own a gun until 2008, when District of Columbia v. Heller struck down the capital’s law effectively banning handguns in the home. In fact, every other time the court had ruled previously, it had ruled otherwise. Why such a head-snapping turnaround? Don’t look for answers in dusty law books or the arcane reaches of theory.
Today at the NRA’s headquarters in Fairfax, Virginia, oversized letters on the facade no longer refer to “marksmanship” and “safety.” Instead, the Second Amendment is emblazoned on a wall of the building’s lobby. Visitors might not notice that the text is incomplete. It reads:
“.. the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
The first half—the part about the well regulated militia—has been edited out.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: ~Lucidity
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
'Nuff said.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Oh, so you and the rest of the anti-gun crowd would be fine if the NRA became a well regulated militia? Whatever definition that is? Then would the anti-gun crowd start focusing on criminals who illegally own and commit crimes with illegal firearms and leave the law abiding gun owners in peace?
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Oh, so you and the rest of the anti-gun crowd would be fine if the NRA became a well regulated militia? Whatever definition that is?
originally posted by: Bluntone22
I thought it was a no no to theorize what the founding fathers intended.
How many potential criminals are there out there? Among your law abiding gun owners? How many people are criminals before they commit that first criminal act...with as we've seen time and time again legal firearms.
71% of gunshot victims had previous arrest records.
64% had been convicted of a crime.
Each had an average of 11 prior arrests. 1, 2
63% of victims had criminal histories and 73% of that group knew their assailant (twice as often as victims without criminal histories). 3
74% of homicides during the commission of a felony involve guns. 4
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: ~Lucidity
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
'Nuff said.
Nuff said? You added nothing on topic. Nor, unless you've read the article before or are a super speed reader, did you have time to read the four pages in the article.
Nuff said.
originally posted by: avgguy
So you're mad the the NRA doesn't have the full quote inscribed at its offices? And how does that equate them "changing the second amendment"?
I also assume that you're against abortion as well? Considering it takes millions of American lives per year because of "rights, revisionist history and lobbying"
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: avgguy
So you're mad the the NRA doesn't have the full quote inscribed at its offices? And how does that equate them "changing the second amendment"?
I also assume that you're against abortion as well? Considering it takes millions of American lives per year because of "rights, revisionist history and lobbying"
I'm mad?
Another who can't stay on topic. Sigh....
In cases in the 19th Century, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment does not bar state regulation of firearms. For example, in United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 553 (1875), the Court stated that the Second Amendment “has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government,” and in Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 265 (1886), the Court reiterated that the Second Amendment “is a limitation only upon the power of Congress and the National government, and not upon that of the States.” Although most of the rights in the Bill of Rights have been selectively incorporated (PDF) into the rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment and thus cannot be impaired by state governments, the Second Amendment has never been so incorporated. [UPDATE: In McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), the Supreme Court addressed this issue, ruling that Second Amendment rights are applicable to states through the Fourteenth Amendment.]