It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: anonymous1legion
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: anonymous1legion
They look to be both Apollo 17, U'll let you wade through the pics here,
www.flickr.com...
originally posted by: anonymous1legion
explain the missing large rock, and are you saying the large hill would look the same distance relative to the photographer in both pics, even though the landing sites are some distance apart?! if i see a hill on earth the distance AND position of said hill does not sit still as i move closer, these 2 are clearly same distance and same position relative to the photographer in my opinion anyways
originally posted by: Kapusta
My question is . Why has it taken so long to release them?
Anyone got a logical explanation?
I'm saying those aren't from two different missions. They look like two slightly different perspectives of the same mission.
originally posted by: anonymous1legion
if i see a hill on earth the distance AND position of said hill does not sit still as i move closer, these 2 are clearly same distance and same position relative to the photographer in my opinion anyways
originally posted by: Helious
a reply to: anonymous1legion
The discrepancy is likely because the background is Scotchlite. It has arguably been proven that the relative distance between objects in the foreground of many NASA photos of the moon was likely not more than 40 meters away from the background.
This can be seen here.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: Helious
Agreed.
Cause, if we didn't go, then why can I spot the mirrors we left there if I have a good enough telescope?
Or the pieces of tech we actually just left there on the moon for that matter?
But I do think there is more to the story than what we are told. Bunch of astronauts have said questionable things about what they've seen.
They can't all be crazy.
~Tenth
originally posted by: ngchunter
originally posted by: Helious
a reply to: anonymous1legion
The discrepancy is likely because the background is Scotchlite. It has arguably been proven that the relative distance between objects in the foreground of many NASA photos of the moon was likely not more than 40 meters away from the background.
This can be seen here.
Wrong. The Apollo photos between different sites do demonstrate parallax and the 3d shapes of the distant mountains can be seen. Here's a cross-eye stereo image from two photos from Apollo 15:
s319.photobucket.com...
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: Helious
Agreed.
Cause, if we didn't go, then why can I spot the mirrors we left there if I have a good enough telescope?
Or the pieces of tech we actually just left there on the moon for that matter?
But I do think there is more to the story than what we are told. Bunch of astronauts have said questionable things about what they've seen.
They can't all be crazy.
~Tenth
originally posted by: anonymous1legion
was viewing images on op link and found this one..
and on nasa wiki found this..
same hill same angle (roughly) different objects and large rock gone, the latter is apollo 17 im assuming the first is 11, is it the same place in both pics?