It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MrSpad
Now that is a Russian wet dream and nothing more. They are tossing dumb bombs around which means actually hitting anything of value is unlikely. You can expect many more of these great victories that also have undertone of threat to the West. Make a deal a with us or we will drive terrorist into Europe. Russian propaganda much like its air campaign are about 3 decades behind the times.
The intervention would have put an end to the war. With Assad out of power the Syrian army would be under new leadership. Elected by the people of Syria.
originally posted by: Isurrender73
originally posted by: MrSpad
Now that is a Russian wet dream and nothing more. They are tossing dumb bombs around which means actually hitting anything of value is unlikely. You can expect many more of these great victories that also have undertone of threat to the West. Make a deal a with us or we will drive terrorist into Europe. Russian propaganda much like its air campaign are about 3 decades behind the times.
Your pro American Rhetoric is getting old. You constantly post lies about Russia with absolutely no proof and no links.
Your either extremely nieve, a troll or a shill. We don't need your rhetoric. Deny Ignorance.
originally posted by: anticitizen
that's why europe should only tke women and children.
1. decreases the number of refugees to about 20%.
2. decreases the possibility of terrorists seeping into europe dramatically.
I saw a video from an Su-34 where the crosshairs were on the center of the screen, and the bomb landed off the screen.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: spy66
Uhm, you didn't read that very well, now did you. Maybe you can actually READ what I say first.
I saw a video from an Su-34 where the crosshairs were on the center of the screen, and the bomb landed off the screen.
Funny, the only part I see anywhere in that post that you were replying to about an Su-24 is about them carrying cluster bomb units.
You also don't put the crosshairs "on the field where it's going to hit", you put them on the target, so you get the best images of impact. If it's a laser or optically guided munition, the crosshairs are where the bomb is going to hit, as that's where the laser is aimed. If it's a satellite guided munition you want to see the impact, to get the best damage assessment you can. You don't look at the area around where the bomb is aimed. The fact that it hit that far off, proves exactly what I said about them using iron bombs, and not PGMs.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: spy66
And I know very well that you don't look NEAR a target to get a damage assessment, part of which is seeing the impact of the bomb. That's like looking up into the sky, while shooting a gun at a target. Whether it's a guided munition or not, you keep the crosshairs locked on the target, not near it, not around it. You have to see where the bomb hits, as it's hitting, to get an accurate assessment, and to decide if you need to reattack or not. Looking somewhere else doesn't give you that.
And look at where he has the crosshairs. Almost right on top of the target area. Not "in a field near where the bomb is going to hit". He's still looking right at the target.
And you can clearly see that not all the munitions they're using are PGMs in the videos that they have released of the aircraft on their airfield. The larger bombs have no seeker head to steer them, either laser, or optical, and no sign of satellite antennas on them.