It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Russia has said it is targeting Islamic State (IS) and other militant groups but the Syrian opposition and others have suggested rebel factions opposed to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad - the Kremlin's ally - are bearing the brunt of the attacks.
- source
The Russian defence ministry initially said the first wave of strikes targeted only the jihadist group, Islamic State (IS), which controls large parts of Syria and is fighting both government and rebel forces.
The following day, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov clarified that the air campaign was targeting "all terrorists" in Syria, and not just IS. His ministry said a report by the Syrian Civil Defence rescue organisation of 33 civilian deaths on the first day of the air strikes was "false".
But the US and its allies noted that the strikes took place where IS had little or no presence. They instead appeared to be aimed at rebels backed by Gulf Arab and Western states who are advancing on Latakia province - the coastal heartland of Mr Assad's Alawite sect. At least one group that has been armed and trained by the CIA was hit, US officials said.
Why doesn't Russia target the terrorists in eastern Ukraine
Will the west "defend" it's "moderate Syrian allies" against Russian attacks??
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
Why doesn't Russia target the terrorists in eastern Ukraine
You mean those nazi's the west were funding to cause & stir up trouble in the lead up to the elections? Haha, I'm sure Russia knows that despite the fact they're nazi's, they're still Ukranian.
I doubt it, they've been trying to oust Assad for ages, and don't fall for the ISIS crap, if the Americans were really trying to get rid of them, they've failed miserably hence why the Russians have now stepped in.
It's also hilarious that the U.S. accuses Russia of bombing indiscriminately, like they haven't killed plenty of civilians before, so why give a crap now? Maybe it's because Russia are doing a better job at eliminating their targets.
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
It's also hilarious that the U.S. accuses Russia of bombing indiscriminately, like they haven't killed plenty of civilians before, so why give a crap now? Maybe it's because Russia are doing a better job at eliminating their targets.
Textno - I mean those Nazi's shipped by Russia into Ukraine to destabilize a supposedly friendly state they had previously guaranteed never to invade.
originally posted by: spirit_horse
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
It's also hilarious that the U.S. accuses Russia of bombing indiscriminately, like they haven't killed plenty of civilians before, so why give a crap now? Maybe it's because Russia are doing a better job at eliminating their targets.
Exactly, but more than likely because Russia doesn't hamstring their troops with ridiculous rules of engagement like our US politicians like to do. Russian troops will be effective and won't worry about the messy part of war. After all, it is war!
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Putin says Russia has invaded Ukraine - are you calling your boss a liar?
You are not neutral - you are a puppet.
Which goes to show how much better the US is at clusterf**king than Russia - Russia can only manage a local clusterf**k.