posted on Oct, 1 2015 @ 03:43 PM
a reply to: Vasa Croe
I just want to take a moment to say thanks for discussing this topic in a rational manner.
The main reason for it was to see if she released the location of or knew the location was compromised prior to the attack.
It has already been shown in previous emails on that server that his locations and movements were discussed. If it was because of her server that
these attacks were able to be pinpointed to his location....that would be pretty damning.
This I think is a legitimate concern and should be investigated as long as there isn't already incontrovertible evidence that would invalidate that
hypothesis. The thing is, do we need to re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-investigate everything
all over again to investigate this possibility? It
wouldn't be conclusive in of itself if emails containing information that could
have been used to facilitate the attack are found. There's only
really two ways of proving a hypothesis about compromised emails even if emails that could fit the bill are discovered on the server:
1. Forensic evidence that the email server had in fact been compromised.
2. Evidence that the attackers used information originating from emails on the server.
The truth is that even if the hypothesis is correct, the chances of proving it are probably pretty slim at this point short of finding a stolen email
from Clinton's account in the hands of somebody involved in the attack.
Again...why wipe it if there is no information regarding this on there? That is something guilty parties do, regardless of any other
information on it.
I have no doubt that among all those emails there are some that Clinton and others do not want out but that doesn't mean that these emails are related
to Benghazi. I mean, there could be pictures of Anthony Weiner's junk in there. That said, I don't have any sympathy for Hillary. The whole purpose of
this private email server nonsense is to be able to control information. I'm of the opinion that any official communication should be on government
The very fact that she even USED this server should be grounds for her dismissal as a candidate....it shows she does not follow her own
I don't disagree that her fitness to hold any office, let alone President, is in question but the same is basically true of all of the candidates.
Trump vs Clinton? Bush vs Clinton? Cruz vs Clinton? What can be said of a system of selecting a leader that results in choices like those? Nothing