It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
a reply to: AgarthaSeed
What happened to- "I take Corey's info with a grain of salt"? You've already posted a link twice to his website and now you're taking a defensive stance to negative comments on him.
Hmmmmmmm...
This website focuses on the “Message” that was delivered by the “Blue Avians” - 1 of 5 beings: the Orb Beings, the Blue Avians, the Golden Triangle-Headed Beings and two others who have not revealed themselves to us yet. The "Orb Beings" have been visiting “Many Tens of Thousands” of people in the form of “Blue/Indigo Balls of Light” while others have been visited by the “Blue Avians” and given a “Greeting Phrase” to know one another by.
originally posted by: Neill887
I don't trust Randy Cramer and Corey Goode since they haven't really spoken a word about the Greys.
We know from multiple researchers that there is an ongoing abduction program. The small greys are the worker bees, the large greys are the overseeers and then there's Mantis type beings that are higher up in the chain again.
Researcher professor David Jacobs and others have found that the goal of the abductions is a hybrid program and Jacobs has also found that the hybrids are integrating into our society at least since 2003 and abductees are being trained for some future event where they have to assist when the masses panic.
Why are these guys not talking about this subject? The most important question to be answered right now is what is the purpose of the hybrid program? As long as Cramer and Goode are not speaking about this, they can't be taken seriously.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
I have never even heard of this guy before now...or his coffee mugs for that matter.
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
If these clowns start talking about greys they somehow become more credible and can be taken seriously, just for speaking about greys?
originally posted by: Neill887
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
If these clowns start talking about greys they somehow become more credible and can be taken seriously, just for speaking about greys?
Lol, I never said they could then be taken seriously. You're reading what you want to read.
I don't trust Randy Cramer and Corey Goode since they haven't really spoken a word about the Greys.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
Your criteria for being taken seriously or trusting them was talking about the Greys.
I don't trust Randy Cramer and Corey Goode since they haven't really spoken a word about the Greys.
But now you are saying that you still wouldn't trust them? Then you bring Jacobs into the mix as someone who CAN be taken seriously? Thats like saying don't take Larry and Moe seriously but Curly knew exactly what he was saying. Actually Jacobs looks more like Larry, but you get the idea..
originally posted by: Neill887
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
If these clowns start talking about greys they somehow become more credible and can be taken seriously, just for speaking about greys?
Lol, I never said they could then be taken seriously. You're reading what you want to read.
And Jacobs has at least shown that he has been doing research and that he has come to his conclusions after decades of research and hundreds of regressions. The same goes for John E. Mack, who has actually spend a lot of time doing actual research into the phenomenon.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Neill887
And Jacobs has at least shown that he has been doing research and that he has come to his conclusions after decades of research and hundreds of regressions. The same goes for John E. Mack, who has actually spend a lot of time doing actual research into the phenomenon.
Have you personally inspected Jacob's work? Listened to his unedited "regression" sessions? Sent him panties for "DNA testing"? No, he is just as much a con artist as these guys. Mack may be the only legitimate name mentioned, unfortunately "recovered memories from regression" has been shown to be a false assumption. Sure it was all the rage in the 80s and 90s in psychology but the same field that promoted it as a memory recovery technique has now shown it to be useless for that.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Neill887
Please, when you talk about Jacobs' collecting panties give me a good source
Yeah, ...it's a known fact and I'm not getting into it anymore. Do a search here, I am sure there will be references....even the audio. Good luck.