It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TinkerHaus
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: TinkerHaus
I understand the problem with price. Most people buy cars in the $30k range anyway, no?
The problem with the 30K price tag is not that it’s not affordable. Nissan is a mid-range vehicle manufacturer; they aren’t going to make a car that is “unaffordable”.
The problem is the quality of the car you are getting for that 30K.
Subtract the expensive home power generating electric engine and battery and your left with a car that would sell for far far cheaper with an internal combustion engine.
This is not a problem if it makes the individual consumer happy to be driving a cheap car with an expensive engine (not to mention the hire maintenance and repair costs). If going Green is your thing, and paying a premium on your vehicle in order to do your part is acceptable; than vehicles like this are perfect they are both affordable and move you closer to your goal.
But if going green is not a priority for you; than the 30K price tag (though affordable) may not be appealing due to the quality of car you be getting for your 30K.
This is why it’s important for the cost of these power systems to come down; so that the quality of the overall car can go up at the various price points. This will make buying these types of cars a no brainer; both those who want to go green will buy, and those who want a quality car will buy.
I had the pleasure of driving an “Affordable” prius the other day. It was a nice car that handled itself well. But I was taken aback by how I felt like I was driving the used neon I bought 15 years ago when I was in high school. Don’t get me wrong; I loved that neon; but if someone told me it would cost me 30K I would have laughed at them.
So I drive Priuses, Volts, and Leafs.. None of them feel like the $^tty Neon I owned 20 years ago..
Higher maintenance costs? No - it's more like 1/2 the maintenance costs!
Certainly a Leaf isn't a Beamer, but it's a decent car for a lower cost than a traditional car over the lifespan of the vehicle.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: TinkerHaus
originally posted by: DanDanDat
originally posted by: TinkerHaus
I understand the problem with price. Most people buy cars in the $30k range anyway, no?
The problem with the 30K price tag is not that it’s not affordable. Nissan is a mid-range vehicle manufacturer; they aren’t going to make a car that is “unaffordable”.
The problem is the quality of the car you are getting for that 30K.
Subtract the expensive home power generating electric engine and battery and your left with a car that would sell for far far cheaper with an internal combustion engine.
This is not a problem if it makes the individual consumer happy to be driving a cheap car with an expensive engine (not to mention the hire maintenance and repair costs). If going Green is your thing, and paying a premium on your vehicle in order to do your part is acceptable; than vehicles like this are perfect they are both affordable and move you closer to your goal.
But if going green is not a priority for you; than the 30K price tag (though affordable) may not be appealing due to the quality of car you be getting for your 30K.
This is why it’s important for the cost of these power systems to come down; so that the quality of the overall car can go up at the various price points. This will make buying these types of cars a no brainer; both those who want to go green will buy, and those who want a quality car will buy.
I had the pleasure of driving an “Affordable” prius the other day. It was a nice car that handled itself well. But I was taken aback by how I felt like I was driving the used neon I bought 15 years ago when I was in high school. Don’t get me wrong; I loved that neon; but if someone told me it would cost me 30K I would have laughed at them.
So I drive Priuses, Volts, and Leafs.. None of them feel like the $^tty Neon I owned 20 years ago..
Higher maintenance costs? No - it's more like 1/2 the maintenance costs!
Certainly a Leaf isn't a Beamer, but it's a decent car for a lower cost than a traditional car over the lifespan of the vehicle.
What's the expected battery life of one of these electric cars? I would guess the average car battery is 7-8 years so I was wondering how these compare.
I can't believe they would be cheap to replace either.
Also I have a few more questions since you have an electric car.
How does the heat and air conditioning function and what does that do to driving range?
Also it gets cold where I live, how do these cars fare in frigid temperatures?
originally posted by: olaru12
Sorry that technology will never be allowed in the US; Not enough profit for the energy and oil companies that rule our world.
In some states it's illegal to capture rain water from your roof.
www.bloomberg.com...
Musk Says Tesla Will Make Cars in China in Next 3-4 Years
Tesla Motors Inc. Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk, who’s preparing to begin deliveries of the Model S electric vehicle in China, forecast the company will be making cars in the country in the next three to four years.
The company is also building a “big” network of battery-charging stations in China, including superchargers in Beijing and Shanghai, the billionaire said at a packed Geekpark Conference in the nation’s capital yesterday. Today, he told reporters in Beijing that the company plans to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in the country
originally posted by: TinkerHaus
originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: Bluntone22
Yeah, a home fuel cell would be a lot cheaper.
This isn't meant to be a full-time home generator, it's just a feature for emergency use.
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: TinkerHaus
originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: Bluntone22
Yeah, a home fuel cell would be a lot cheaper.
This isn't meant to be a full-time home generator, it's just a feature for emergency use.
Might be but the chance you're ever going to need 2 days worth of emergency house power is pretty low in most places. You can pretty much set a basic power backup for your house for a few thousand. Might not be green but it works and it's cheaper. Let the rich eco snobs pay for early adoption of this kind of tech. Most like it'll be obsolete before it's close to paid for. Bad investment for the average person.