Repent you Sinners, and bow down to ALL that is Holy, er NOT.

a reply to: neo96

Something controls the entire world now... people are trying to wrestle that control away. That's what you have a problem with.

Just goes to show that there isn't really a difference between politics and religion. Both have extremists, both have tenets and dogma to adhere to. Both have leaders that define their roles by their egos. And both have a fanatic fan base that follow their every word.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: neo96

Climate Change is a world agenda. And I didn't know that helping the poor was an American tradition either...

It is a POLITICAL AGENDA.

Hell is a neocon's dream come true.

Trying to control the entire world.

Yea, you've jumped off the deep end with this one neo.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Nope.

Really saying politicians aren't pushing it?

We know the current potus has after all hes the 'climate' president.

We have the secretary of state going around saying the 'greatest' threat to us is the climate changing!

The only people that have 'jumped off the deep end' are those who are defending the Pope, and the Potus.

a reply to: neo96

That's because it is true and we need to do something about it. Who else should push it exactly?

a reply to: thesaneone

Take a closer look but what does this have to do with the topic?

That's what it looks like to me, even upon closer inspection. It's ironic, because the OP's premise is a logical leap off the proverbial deep end, which is not unusual for this poster, in my opinion.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: neo96

That's because it is true and we need to do something about it. Who else should push it exactly?

No one should be pushing it.

Green legislation, and the EPA have existed for over half of a century.

Meaning the STATE has been in charge our environment in that entirety.

What the hell is the issue ?

Saying the last 60 years have been a waste of time, and BILLIONS of dollars to now people are running around with their hair all on fire saying 'oh god,oh god were all gonna die if we don't listen to the Pope, and the Potus.'

I pass on that stupidity.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: neo96

That's because it is true and we need to do something about it. Who else should push it exactly?

No one should be pushing it.

Green legislation, and the EPA have existed for over half of a century.

Meaning the STATE has been in charge our environment in that entirety.

What the hell is the issue ?

Saying the last 60 years have been a waste of time, and BILLIONS of dollars to now people are running around with their hair all on fire saying 'oh god,oh god were all gonna die if we don't listen to the Pope, and the Potus.'

I pass on that stupidity.

No one is saying that the last 60 years have been a waste of time. They are saying that we still haven't done enough to combat it and we need to take further steps. Plus, the WHOLE world agrees with these two. You make it sound like only the POTUS and the Pope are collaborating together about it. That isn't true. Every other country agrees with this. The only people who don't agree with it are the people who let the media tell them otherwise.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

No one is saying that the last 60 years have been a waste of time.

That is EXACTLY what they are doing.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Krazysh0t

No one is saying that the last 60 years have been a waste of time.

That is EXACTLY what they are doing.

Prove it.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

The Pope,and the Potus are proving it rather nicely.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Krazysh0t

The Pope,and the Potus are proving it rather nicely.

Not good enough. Prove it. I want quotes and links, not your very warped bias.

You yahoo's are so off topic now it is pathetic...

I find it interesting no one is discussing the problems mankind is facing due to poor leadership.. No matter what side of the aisle they sit their lazy asses on or whose ass they kiss when they are praying...

Wake up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I will ask it AGAIN.


Green legislation EXISTS ? YES. The State controls the air,water,and land.

Does the STATE not already have regulatory agency charged with the 'protection' of the environment ?

YES.

So why are people whining about 'climate change'. ?

a reply to: neo96

I already answered that question. It isn't enough yet. The climate is still getting worse.

NOAA: Better Than 97 Percent Chance 2015 Will Be Hottest Year on Record

Meteorologists say 2015 is a near certainty to eclipse 2014 as the hottest year on record. This year, six of the eight months have been record-breaking, with only April and January failing to set new records. Since 2000, Earth has broken monthly heat records 30 times and seasonal heat records 11 times. The last time a monthly cold record was broken was in 1916. Records go back to 1880.

Do you think that just because the EPA exists that magically the climate is supposed to get better?

Since some people want links so they can IGNORE them.


Obama: No greater threat to future than climate change

(CNN)What President Barack Obama described as the greatest threat to future generations was neither terrorism nor ISIS. It wasn't nuclear weapons in rogue states either.

www.cnn.com...

The 1955 Air Pollution Control Act was the first U.S federal legislation that pertained to air pollution; it also provided funds for federal government research of air pollution. The first federal legislation to actually pertain to "controlling" air pollution was the Clean Air Act of 1963. The 1963 act accomplished this by establishing a federal program within the U.S. Public Health Service and authorized research into techniques for monitoring and controlling air pollution. In 1967, the Air Quality Act enabled the federal government to increase its activities to investigate enforcing interstate air pollution transport, and, for the first time, to perform far-reaching ambient monitoring studies and stationary source inspections. The 1967 act also authorized expanded studies of air pollutant emission inventories, ambient monitoring techniques, and control techniques.[1]

Major amendments to the law, requiring regulatory controls for air pollution, passed in 1970, 1977 and 1990.

en.wikipedia.org...

The United States Environmental Protection Agency[2] (EPA or sometimes USEPA) is an agency of the U.S. federal government which was created for the purpose of protecting human health and the environment by writing and enforcing regulations based on laws passed by Congress.[3] The EPA was proposed by President Richard Nixon and began operation on December 2, 1970, after Nixon signed an executive order. The order establishing the EPA was ratified by committee hearings in the House and Senate.[4] The agency is led by its Administrator, who is appointed by the president and approved by Congress. The current administrator is Gina McCarthy.[5] The EPA is not a Cabinet department, but the administrator is normally given cabinet rank.

en.wikipedia.org...

So why does the church of climatology IGNORE this?

Because it doesn't fit their POLITICAL AGENDA's thats why.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Oh really?

The NOAA.

A government agency says X.

Not much proof there as ALL government agencies are nothing but political extensions of the administration now.

a reply to: neo96

Oh right. I forgot. To the right wing, the government isn't a valid source becaaaaause it says things that you don't agree with.