It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gemwolf
Look up pericentromeric chromosome 8 and chromosome Xq28 to begin with.
Also - if you weren't born with a sexual orientation i.e. "neutral" it means that one day you made the conscious decision of being straight. Can you tell us about that day when you decided to be heterosexual?
Also - if people are turned gay by "propaganda/the 'Luminati techniques'/genetically modified food", why aren't all people gay? Wouldn't everyone be affected equally and indiscriminately? Are you aware of Occam's razor? Isn't it more reasonable to accept that people have been born gay for thousands of years, instead of some elaborate plan by some made-up "power" to turn the entire population gay?
Really. Think about it, just for a minute.
originally posted by: Anonymous007
Your statistic is absurd. I have known many gays throughout my life and not one of them has killed themselves.
originally posted by: johnnyjoe1979
While I guess this might be another holy grail to the LGBT movement and this will fall on deaf ears but genetics and it's conclusions are often controversial, just like this study. I don't believe in the idea genetics determine a personality but rather like a selfdriving car that grows in programming as it goes around, everybody born a clean slate or tabula rasa, the nurture rather than nature.
That's an interesting question. It reminds me of another question I have made up to which I also don't have an answer. It is; if gays talk about love, I get the impression they mean it is the same thing as straight love. But if they never knew straight love because many say they were never attracted to women or even knew they were gay from a young age, how can they be sure about this?
TBH I don't think it's a conscious choice and I think the question might just be too difficult. After all, we are all human, then why are some straight, some bi and some gay?
Even if it would be genetics, there was a time when the gene didn't exist if you assume evolution is correct and life gradually grew from noncomplex to complex. So why did some develop it and pass it on while others didn't?
Actually a simple theory is that there are people who would want to # as a lifestyle, all day long a lifetime. But they need people to do that with so that's why they want everyone to become *bi* and are just using gays to speed up the process.
Another thing I wondered about I would want to mention about the LGBT doctrine. There's the argument of Christianity being ancient and we all need to move forward to 2015, not year 0 when everyone was primitive. But at the same time they argue homosexuality has existed for centuries to justify their existence. Isn't it an obvious contradiction or is it just me.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
Know what is funny? Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with homosexuality. Just read it again. Heck read the whole Bible. You will see that it even interprets itself. I say let the Bible interpret itself. And you will see that the Bible interprets the story not to be about homosexuality but something else. Read.
Nothing in the Bible is complicated. God would be stupid to write a book that people couldn't understand.
That'd be the stupidest thing that He ever did. ~ Norvel Hayes (@ 3 min)
drrichswier.com...
Students were once taught the value of US Constitution
originally posted by: Gemwolf
originally posted by: Anonymous007
Your statistic is absurd. I have known many gays throughout my life and not one of them has killed themselves.
Sure. But how many gays didn't you know because they committed suicide...
originally posted by: theantediluvian
I find it highly strange that marriage equality and abortion are symptomatic of Satan's agenda at work in America but hundreds of years of slavery, genocide of ingenious peoples, indentured servitude and abuse of immigrants (who have themselves been a majority Christian) isn't.
originally posted by: NotTooHappy
a reply to: GoShredAK
Jesus and SSatan are fictional characters and your scripture is fiction as well.
Quit attempting to use fairy tales to justify your bigotry, hatred and fear.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: GoShredAK
Same for gay folk they didn't choose they just were attracted to the same sex instead of the opposite.
Just how God made them.
originally posted by: Gh0stwalker
You lost me at Jesus Christ and "Sripture".
originally posted by: deadeyedick
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
Just posted this in the 'Homosexuality is a Choice' thread, but it goes for you too:
OP...you're missing the whole point. It doesn't matter if it's genetic, a choice, a lie, an experiment, for attention or just for personal pleasure. As long as it (whatever 'it' may be- gay, straight, furries, S&M) includes the words 'consenting' and 'adult' then it's none of your damn business. Live and let live.
Everybody keeps whining about the 'gay agenda'....the gay agenda just seeks to eliminate hatred and discrimination, the gay agenda simply seeks equality. Teaching kids what 'gay' means won't make them gay. And no one is asking you to take a dick up the butt. So...find a new hobby.
that is bs cause it is spreading like a virus
originally posted by: GeisterFahrer
originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: GoShredAK
The point of gay animals has went right over your head , it means that it points to a genetic reason for the behaviour or was that to difficult for you to understand obviously it was.
There are also animals that eat their young. When humans do it, it is considered a crime (to go further, we deem the person mentally unstable). There are also animals in the animal kingdom that force themselves sexually on non mature, young, animals within their own species. When humans do it, it is called pedophilia. When humans do this to animals, it is called bestiality. When animals do this to humans, I am not sure what that is called. And I don't really want to know.
Now, what if the human consented to the dog humping his leg? would this make it right?