It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
ISIS is horrible. They do things like behead and crucify people who challenge their rule. Saudi Arabia beheads and crucifies people for the same reason and yet because they're in bed with the Western neoliberal establishment, they're not denounced for doing the same thing.
Welcome to far right-wing theocracies.
Whenever it serves its interests, Saudi Arabia channels funds to media organizations all over the world, from the United Kingdom to Iran and Senegal. The funding usually takes the form of outright donations or thousands of subscriptions.
In 2011, for example, the Saudi embassy in London suggested funding Wesal Farsi TV (now called Tawhid), a London-based, Persian-language TV station owned by a Sunni Iranian citizen opposed to his country’s government. In return for monthly funding and allowing Saudi Arabia to appoint a representative to its board of governors, the TV station would respond to Iranian media criticism of Saudi Arabia.
Another method used by the government is to counter-attack or sanction in response to damaging media reports. This is what happened to the London-based Financial Times newspaper. It had to withdraw its correspondent and close its Riyadh bureau for publishing “lies” about Saudi Arabia. The Saudi authorities even considered legal proceedings if the newspaper did not issue an apology and undertake to cover Saudi Arabia in a “neutral” and “objective” manner.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: theantediluvian
I wouldn't label them right winged these are left winged theocracys
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: theantediluvian
I wouldn't label them right winged these are left winged theocracys
LOL Saudi Arabia is one of the most conservative, right wing places you'll ever find. Their idea of being "progressive" is to debate whether or not women should be allowed to drive.
originally posted by: Boeing777
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: theantediluvian
I wouldn't label them right winged these are left winged theocracys
LOL Saudi Arabia is one of the most conservative, right wing places you'll ever find. Their idea of being "progressive" is to debate whether or not women should be allowed to drive.
Apparently they can't even have bank accounts or go on a holiday to another country without a written permission by her husband. How can such a retarded and backward country still be in bed with Western governments who always seem to moan about human rights?
originally posted by: Tindalos2013
For clarification the crucifixion involves the beheading of the accused before the body is displayed on the cross or similar structure.
But for the record, the West doesn't really give a crap about human rights either. They only care about "human rights" when they can use them for leverage.
originally posted by: skunkape23
originally posted by: Tindalos2013
For clarification the crucifixion involves the beheading of the accused before the body is displayed on the cross or similar structure.
Well, that's mighty kind of them.
Good to know we're dealing with compassionate folks.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: enlightenedservant
remember in this world things are opposites
The US freedoms held by conservatives are very liberal to the Saudis. But that does not mean they are right wing conservatives on the same par with the right wing conservatives of the US. that is where much confusion lay.
US conservatives are not the same a Saudi Arabian and any other Middle Eastern Conservatives.
ME Islamic fundamentalists are not the same as US Christian fundamentalists.
A Christian pastor in Arizona is publicly calling for gays to be stoned to death, and is angry that other pastors are not following God’s command “to kill the gays.”
In a recent sermon Pastor David Berzins of Word of Truth Baptist Church condemned all those who would refuse to endorse God’s call to kill the gays. In particular, Berzins was angry with a fellow pastor who had refused to endorse far-right pastor Steven Anderson’s call for death to LGBT people.
Bezrin and Anderson both argue that Christians should follow God’s command, as stated in Deuteronomy, that gays be put to death.
- See more at: www.patheos.com... f
The former president of Bob Jones University, one of the nation’s bastions of Christian fundamentalism, has apologized for comments he made in 1980 that gays and lesbians should be stoned to death.
www.religionnews.com...
1 Timothy 1:7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Spider879
I am a Christian and I do not think gays should be stoned.
the nut in Arizona does not even know what he is saying. he is a fool. But here is what Paul said about those like him.
1 Timothy 1:7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: theantediluvian
I wouldn't label them right winged these are left winged theocracys
LOL Saudi Arabia is one of the most conservative, right wing places you'll ever find. Their idea of being "progressive" is to debate whether or not women should be allowed to drive.
originally posted by: chuck258
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: theantediluvian
I wouldn't label them right winged these are left winged theocracys
LOL Saudi Arabia is one of the most conservative, right wing places you'll ever find. Their idea of being "progressive" is to debate whether or not women should be allowed to drive.
Hence, when compared to the rest of the Muslim world, Saudi Arabia is about as Liberal as they get, and attrocities like this are still commonplace.
Can't use the same rubric for a western country and apply it to a middle eastern country, it's apples to oranges. This is about as Liberal as Muslims get, he got a trial and a 'chance' to 'defend' himself. vs. another Muslim country where he probably would have been shot on the spot, or captured and headless by dusk.