It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...4 pages on this thread and I see WAY TO much ignorance...
I never implied that A was a single person. That was an assumption on your part.
Imagine A goes on television every day for a week and tells you that there are no jobs in his neighborhood. He never gets hired when he goes on interviews.
You suggested that A found a way to beat the system, stealing, blackmail, bribery, etc.
this IS the type of assumption people make when their brains are lazy.
The more he complains about his situation, the more other people tend to look at him as less educated, not as smart. and begin to treat him that way.
Do you see it yet?
Analysis of genomes from around the world establishes that there is a biological basis for race, despite the official statements to the contrary of leading social science organizations. An illustration of the point is the fact that with mixed race populations, such as African Americans, geneticists can now track along an individual’s genome, and assign each segment to an African or European ancestor, an exercise that would be impossible if race did not have some basis in biological reality.
The genes specially affected by natural selection control not only expected traits like skin color and nutritional metabolism, but also some aspects of brain function. Though the role of these selected brain genes is not yet understood, the obvious truth is that genes affecting the brain are just as much subject to natural selection as any other category of gene.
Conventionally, these social differences are attributed solely to culture. But if that’s so, why is it apparently so hard for tribal societies like Iraq or Afghanistan to change their culture and operate like modern states? The explanation could be that tribal behavior has a genetic basis. It’s already known that a genetic system, based on the hormone oxytocin, seems to modulate the degree of in-group trust, and this is one way that natural selection could ratchet the degree of tribal behavior up or down.
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
I can identify traits. Black people are 'black', white people are 'white'. These are general traits however you want to put it, whatever terminology or semantics you want to apply does not change this very simple fact. Michael Jackson is the exception that proves the rule.
originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Different kinds of muscle, different tolerance to sunlight, different facial features and skull shapes, different susceptibilities to disease, different anatomical ratios, different brain to weight ratios. Need I really go on?
A certain gene pool will have certain general genetic traits. The only contention is what to call this. Race has a long history of use, most people think this is outdated but there are general traits. Anyone that believes in biological evolution would be foolish to think that isolated gene pools wouldn't express certain characteristics. The thought is simply untenable from an evolutionary viewpoint. Whether these characteristics constitute a race in the taxonomic sense is beside the point, the point being that we are definitely not all the same and there is no(should be no) shame in admitting that.
Different kinds of muscle, different tolerance to sunlight, different facial features and skull shapes, different susceptibilities to disease, different anatomical ratios, different brain to weight ratios. Need I really go on?
A certain gene pool will have certain general genetic traits. The only contention is what to call this. Race has a long history of use, most people think this is outdated but there are general traits. Anyone that believes in biological evolution would be foolish to think that isolated gene pools wouldn't express certain characteristics. The thought is simply untenable from an evolutionary viewpoint. Whether these characteristics constitute a race in the taxonomic sense is beside the point, the point being that we are definitely not all the same and there is no(should be no) shame in admitting that.
For over a decade, it has been Chinese academics, unencumbered by political correctness, who have embarked upon the race-based research enabled by genomics. The Chinese particularly enjoy IQ-versus-race league tables, because they invariably come out on top. That sort of research makes Westerners squeamish, to put it mildly–which is why today, most research into the genomics of race is still carried out at the Beijing Genomics Institute. By and large, the subject is un-fundable in the West.