It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cosmickat
a reply to: TechUnique
How do you know that your collection of holy words is correct ?
originally posted by: jaws1975
Any loss of life is tragic, but I have to ask you shouldn't you be more concerned with non Christians being killed? In your view Christians are saved and will enter paradise upon death, everyone else will be going to hell. One of the main goals of Christians is to save those who have not accepted Christ. So shouldn't you be more concerned with all the people dying before being saved?
originally posted by: TechUnique
originally posted by: markosity1973
originally posted by: TechUnique
You're going to have to elaborate. As far as I was aware a Coptic Christian is simply a Christian who is Egyptian?
How are they 'pretty much' Catholics? I don't understand your post at all.
Sure
Today, there is a small population of Coptic Christians remaining in Alexandria, but most are located elsewhere. Estimates of the current population of the Coptic Church range from 10 million to 60 million members worldwide. Theologically, Coptic Christianity is very similar to Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy. They profess to be genuine followers of Jesus Christ and a part of His worldwide Church. But, as with Catholicism, they tend to emphasize meritorious works in salvation along with liturgical ritual rather than salvation through a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.
www.gotquestions.org...
As a Catholic, I've been to Coptic mass and it is pretty much the same thing. Same goes for High Anglican mass and Orthodox mass. The oldest churches have almost identical belief systems (although the Ethiopian orthodox are very different and extremely fascinating)
The only thing that makes Roman Catholicism what it is, is the Vatican in Rome. Actual doctrine is so similar it is to the point of splitting hairs once you remove the hierarchy from it and other original churches.
Actually in terms of doctrine there are many differences between the two. (Catholics vs Protestants)
To get into an in depth debate over this would derail the thread though but I love a theological debate so feel free to PM me.
forgive me, no derailment intended at all. But you did begin by introducing a rhetoric theme of "Christian persecution" "bible prophecies " and " evil Catholics " you don't work for Fox News by any chance do you ?
originally posted by: TechUnique
originally posted by: cosmickat
a reply to: TechUnique
How do you know that your collection of holy words is correct ?
You are now starting to derail this thread so I'm not going to respond to your rhetoric.
originally posted by: cosmickat
In my humble opinion religion never was " the opiate of the people " instead it is more akin to the crack coc aine while tripping out in some kind of meth amphetamine craze of the people. The biggest thing history can tell us is that millions have died in the name of a " merciful god " whose teachings they are following. In my experience truly spiritual people do not wear their religion like a club badge, they are at one with their god, whatever form that takes. They live a life of tolerance, are non judgemental and never preach. Kinda the opposite of all structured organised religions.
originally posted by: cosmickat
a reply to: TechUnique
Sorry, but I am less confused than you seem to be.
originally posted by: cosmickat
Irony.
The Catholic religion accounts for more than half of Christianity, globally. For one Christian to say its time that they were seen as separate as they are inherently evil rings out an echo of the exact same consideration that certain followers of Islam ascribe to other followers of Islam. Same religion but utter disdain and no respect for the others beliefs. We all know how that plays out.
"These are our martyrs of today, and they are many. We can say that there are more of them now than there were in the early centuries. I hope the international community does not look on, mute and inert, at such an unacceptable crime," Francis said.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: cosmickat
Irony.
The Catholic religion accounts for more than half of Christianity, globally. For one Christian to say its time that they were seen as separate as they are inherently evil rings out an echo of the exact same consideration that certain followers of Islam ascribe to other followers of Islam. Same religion but utter disdain and no respect for the others beliefs. We all know how that plays out.
HE means the catholic leadership is corrupt. It was them and their templars who carried out the crusades(after the ones done by the muslims first) that did the persecution of other christians who were not bowing to rome.
originally posted by: markosity1973
To put the OP article in context, here is what Pope Francis says on the subject
"These are our martyrs of today, and they are many. We can say that there are more of them now than there were in the early centuries. I hope the international community does not look on, mute and inert, at such an unacceptable crime," Francis said.
www.jpost.com...
No matter what denomination a Christian is, the persecution and martyrdom for faith is growing at an unacceptable rate.
originally posted by: ProfessorChaos
By today's definition, it can't be considered persecution.
Why not?
Because they're Christians.
None of our so-called enlightened community will ever admit to that fact directly because it would put a spotlight on their hypocrisy, so don't expect many people agreeing with you, OP.
Like many other places, anti-Christian sentiment is in vogue on ATS. Oh, you'll get plenty of comments attempting to deflect by saying incredibly ignorant things, and never once will they admit that the eradication of Christianity would be something they would ultimately applaud as a good thing, regardless of how it was accomplished.
Just remember, there is no persecution of Christians; it's all in your head.
Donors in the private sector have offered complete funding for the airfare and the resettlement in the United States of these Iraqi Christians. But the State Department – while admitting 4,425 Somalis to the United States in just the first six months of FY2015, and possibly even accepting members of ISIS through the Syrian and Iraqi refugee program, all paid for by tax dollars, told Dobbs that they “would not support a special category to bring Assyrian Christians into the United States.”
The United States government has made it clear that there is no way that Christians will be supported because of their religious affiliation, even though it is exactly that – their religious affiliation – that makes them candidates for asylum based on a credible fear of persecution from ISIS.
The president’s response appears to be United States policy. Evidence suggests that within the administration not only is there no passion for persecuted Christians under threat of genocide from the Islamic State, there is no room for them, period.
In fact, despite ISIS’ targeting of Iraqi Christians specifically because they are Christians, and, as such, stand in the way of a pure, Islamic Caliphate in the Middle East (and beyond), the U.S. State Department has made it clear that “there is no way that Christians will be supported because of their religious affiliation.”