Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics.

What ever happened to discourse and a free fact filled debate; letting the facts stand or fall on their own merit..?

Oh we are dealing with the kind of people who were trained to go after the messenger if they can not refute the science. Makes perfect sense ...

It is becoming a world where psychotropic drugs or lack thereof seems to be running those who want policy change and only science that agrees with their intent.

a reply to: mOjOm

What are you driving at exactly by saying that??

I was simply pointing out that science isn't always right.
And the AGW theories and predictions have yet to be proven out.

Maybe they will be proven wrong... like the fellows predicting that a man would suffocate if they traveled at speeds in excess of 30 mph, when trains were beginning to approach that speed.

originally posted by: alienmma
There's a difference between approaching a subject with scientific validity and questioning and approaching a subject with complete disdain for the theory and the inability to reason objectively.

Many people that are 'against' climate change do not approach it scientifically or in any sort of scholarly manner.

Uhh there have been plenty of times that those against have come forward scientifically only to face angry sputtering about "cherry picking" and mental acrobatics about why they are wrong. It's an agenda. Why the hell is the answer to curbing climate change a scheme where the political elite make more money?

Scientists from several universities and research centers even asked Obama to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to prosecute groups that “have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America’s response to climate change.”

Well I bet this is because they know about some RICO investigations looking to the ongoing "Climate Change" - "Global Warming" scams most of which are cleverly hidden from the MSM view.

Like the old saying ....

The best defense is a good offense.

Always better to shift the "Blame" before the boiling pot boils over on our own table.

a reply to: xuenchen

To be clear . . . that’s $22 billion of taxpayers’ money . . . the amount that our government pays to stop the “global warming” epidemic. That comes out to $41,856 every minute.

The Cold Truth

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: xuenchen

To be clear . . . that’s $22 billion of taxpayers’ money . . . the amount that our government pays to stop the “global warming” epidemic. That comes out to $41,856 every minute.

The Cold Truth

"The Cold Truth" = "The Cold Cash"

a reply to: xuenchen

Climate Change Business Journal estimates the Climate Change Industry is a $1.5 Trillion dollar escapade, which means four billion dollars a day is spent on our quest to change the climate. That includes everything from carbon markets to carbon consulting, carbon sequestration, renewables, biofuels, green buildings and insipid cars. For comparison global retail sales online are worth around $1.5 trillion. So all the money wasted on the climate is equivalent to all the goods bought online.

Spot the Vested Interest: The $1.5 Trillion Climate Change Industry

I spot 20 of them.

a reply to: neo96

I guess the profiteers behind the global change scam bet on most people been obtuse enough to be able to get enough support.

Clima change, earth clima has been changing since earth became a planet even before life of any kind was an issue and will keep changing way after we no longer be part of earth.

Is no doubt about the changing earth but to pin it to human habitation for profits is what I can not bite into it and never will.

This profiteers rather than planning for the coming water levels to rise and the lost of our profitable coastal areas of over price real state, make sure that people are taken out of harm ways are hell bound into letting the people deal with the problems charge the tax payers, while selling a fixing that never will work.

We humans can deal with a changing earth, but we can not change what is gong to happen, is gong to happen regardless.

The solution is just to bill Republicans for all the damage caused so far by global warming. We could start with the 3 million Japanese people who have just been evacuated from their homes due to unprecedented flooding. Finding them new homes should be pretty spendy. The total bill should be in the trillions and when they can't pay all of it then we can lock them up

a reply to: CB328

So climate change is political.

originally posted by: mOjOm

originally posted by: neo96
I guess you never heard of the US government then eh.

The still have to prove their case don't they??? If they can't prove wrong doing then they have no case against anyone. But if they can then possible action may be needed. Is that wrong??? Should we just allow any organization to push whatever BS they want because nobody can trust anyone to do a proper investigation???

Um yes it is their right to say anything they want period!!

Are you insane?

Freedom of speech!!

It doesn't matter if climate change or fruit salad is the issue!!!

How can free speech have any " wrong doing "????

You are crazy!!!!

a reply to: neo96

Really prosecuting people for disagreeing?

It's the opposite of crying fire in a crowded theater - it's closer to not crying fire when there actually is one

Yes - we are at that point

I don't expect the flat earthers to understand, but the willful dishonestly of big money energy companies threatens our survival

This is no longer about your opinion - nobody cares about your opinion

We have work to do

originally posted by: CB328
The solution is just to bill Republicans for all the damage caused so far by global warming. We could start with the 3 million Japanese people who have just been evacuated from their homes due to unprecedented flooding. Finding them new homes should be pretty spendy. The total bill should be in the trillions and when they can't pay all of it then we can lock them up

Or here's a thought.

The Japanese can take care of their OWN issues instead of the global warming crowd acting like NEOCONS trying to control the world with a manufactured issued 'climate change'.

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: neo96

Really prosecuting people for disagreeing?

It's the opposite of crying fire in a crowded theater - it's closer to not crying fire when there actually is one

Yes - we are at that point

I don't expect the flat earthers to understand, but the willful dishonestly of big money energy companies threatens our survival

This is no longer about your opinion - nobody cares about your opinion

We have work to do

What ever there only problem there is that is what the global warming crowd is doing.

Yelling fire, and watching everyone run to the exit's.

a reply to: neo96

Sadly not the only group out there that probably would like to lock up those that disagree. This whole thing is pretty funny. I would love to see anyone who had the sack to try and actually do it.

Time to buy stock in corrections corporation of America just in case. Wow some people's children amaze me.

a reply to: Spiramirabilis

It's the opposite of crying fire in a crowded theater - it's closer to not crying fire when there actually is one

But my aisle isn't on fire, you just want my popcorn.

originally posted by: johnwick
Um yes it is their right to say anything they want period!!

Are you insane?

Freedom of speech!!

It doesn't matter if climate change or fruit salad is the issue!!!

How can free speech have any " wrong doing "????

You are crazy!!!!

For the last time. I'm talking about them creating false data and bunk science not them voicing their opinion. Or paying scientists to report false results.

Falsifying reports isn't freedom of speech.

a reply to: neo96

The global warming crowd is going to do what they have to do

Run - don't run. Up to you. Everybody is free to try and understand this as best they can

Should people's opinions be allowed to put the entire planet in danger?

It's an interesting question that unfortunately many aren't willing to consider because they're more worried about being fooled than they are worried - about being fooled

Sorry neo - there's only some people that still think this is up for debate

Everybody else is going to focus on solutions

a reply to: Kali74

:-)

It's exhausting

a reply to: Reallyfolks

They aren't asking for people to be locked up just because they deny global warming is because of man made emissions. They are asking for investigations of whether or not there have been RICO violations. Big Tobacco violated RICO, remember?