It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: Phantom423
You're asking irrelevant questions which don't require a response.
How can it be irrelevant to ask you to state the topic?
Don't you know how a debate works? The two sides are called the Proposition and the Opposition. The Proposition proposes a statement: in the present case it might be something like 'The theory of evolution explains the diversity of life better than the the theory (or whatever you prefer to call it) of Creationism.' The task of the Opposition is to refute that statement. They speak in turns, and when the time is up the hearers decide by vote (or some other system) to adopt or reject the proposition.
All I'm asking is for you to state your proposition. It is something you have to do anyway. One sentence, for goodness' sake? How hard can it be?
If you want to debate, you have to play by the rules of debate. Stop being huffy and state your proposition.
The topic of the debate that I set forth is based strictly on hard evidence.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: Phantom423
The topic of the debate that I set forth is based strictly on hard evidence.
State. The. Topic.
Maybe leave creation out of the argument and just debate the science of evolution based on its merits, standing alone
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: Phantom423
That is not a debating topic. I just explained what one is, so you have no excuse for repeating this nonsense.
Until you state a topic, how can you expect anyone to debate you?
You're just hugging the ball to your chest and jumping up and down chanting 'I win, I win!' like a four-year-old. If you want a game, you have to let go of the ball.
It took a long time to get to this, but: thread fail.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
I would consider it but as a whole the average non creationist hasn't the manners I would be comfortable dealing with.
Also I am not a fundamental Christian, have just read the opposing view to evolution and can see a validity in the argument
Maybe leave creation out of the argument and just debate the science of evolution based on its merits, standing alone
I don't believe in the theory of evolution as it stands
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Grimpachi
Oh contrare
The topic is science or are you just trying to sidestep the issue.
I would happily debate the issues I have with science and evolution, unresolved questions need answers.
I disagree with evolution based on science, not creation
Your argument is with God believers, my argument is based on a lack of evidence provided to justify evolution.
Do you believe in the Big Bang or a steady state theory or believe something else
I entered a thread because I wanted to, trying to chase me off is a sign of fear
originally posted by: Phantom423
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Grimpachi
Oh contrare
The topic is science or are you just trying to sidestep the issue.
I would happily debate the issues I have with science and evolution, unresolved questions need answers.
I disagree with evolution based on science, not creation
Your argument is with God believers, my argument is based on a lack of evidence provided to justify evolution.
Do you believe in the Big Bang or a steady state theory or believe something else
I entered a thread because I wanted to, trying to chase me off is a sign of fear
Sounds like you're ready to step up to the plate for the debate. The topics must be scientifically oriented (you did say your argument was with the science). Here's a partial list of proposed topics. Select one and we can start there.
* Creationists preach that the Earth is about 6000 years old. Modern science tells us that the Earth is billions of years old.
* Creationists don't believe in evolution. However, modern science has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that organisms on this planet have evolved and have common genetic ancestry.
* Creationists say that humans and dinosaurs existed in the same period of time. However, modern science tells us that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago.
* Creationists believe that radio carbon dating and other more sophisticated spectroscopic techniques cannot date fossils, even though they have been proven wrong many times.
If you want to select your own topic, that's fine as long as it's based on science. I really makes no difference to me as long as it's science-oriented and is related to evolution.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: Phantom423
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Grimpachi
Oh contrare
The topic is science or are you just trying to sidestep the issue.
I would happily debate the issues I have with science and evolution, unresolved questions need answers.
I disagree with evolution based on science, not creation
Your argument is with God believers, my argument is based on a lack of evidence provided to justify evolution.
Do you believe in the Big Bang or a steady state theory or believe something else
I entered a thread because I wanted to, trying to chase me off is a sign of fear
Sounds like you're ready to step up to the plate for the debate. The topics must be scientifically oriented (you did say your argument was with the science). Here's a partial list of proposed topics. Select one and we can start there.
* Creationists preach that the Earth is about 6000 years old. Modern science tells us that the Earth is billions of years old.
* Creationists don't believe in evolution. However, modern science has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that organisms on this planet have evolved and have common genetic ancestry.
* Creationists say that humans and dinosaurs existed in the same period of time. However, modern science tells us that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago.
* Creationists believe that radio carbon dating and other more sophisticated spectroscopic techniques cannot date fossils, even though they have been proven wrong many times.
If you want to select your own topic, that's fine as long as it's based on science. I really makes no difference to me as long as it's science-oriented and is related to evolution.
Phantom
Quite frankly I dislike you
I think you are both rude and arrogant
What would be the benefit to me to debate you
I have read many of your comments in this particular forum and your stock and trade is attacking people, not the argument but the person
Not interested
Read this thread and see how you attack the person not the issue.
I don't want to be a part of that
But just to put you on the spot
Big Bang?
Steady state?
What do you believe in, where is your faith directed in the beginning ?
Maybe, if you answer that Question I will dance
It takes courage to answer that question, got any?
Creationists don't believe in evolution. However, modern science has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that organisms on this planet have evolved and have common genetic ancestry.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: Phantom423
Creationists don't believe in evolution. However, modern science has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that organisms on this planet have evolved and have common genetic ancestry.
Not according to Craig Venter. According to Venter, there is no tree of life and they have identified as of right now 17 unique gene sets.
Go to about the eight or nine minute mark.
thesciencenetwork.org...
Now pay close attention because Venter makes a joke about a bush of life, and you can tell it was a joke because right after he says there is no tree of life.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: Phantom423
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Since you seem to enjoy biology.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: Phantom423
Then why are you acting like evolution has been proven.. If you really are working on your PhD I am sure you are aware of the search problem I linked you . In which for just one functioning protein you have more possible scenarios than there are physical events in the universe.