It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
+ Clinton is guilty of a long list of fashion crimes.
I mean how many pants suits can one woman have
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: dashen
+ Clinton is guilty of a long list of fashion crimes.
I mean how many pants suits can one woman have
So, we have no evidence that she is guilty of anything, she has not been charged with any crime, and so that means we have to resort to becoming fashion police to de-legitimize her?
I'm sorry. I'm a grown man and I do not pay attention to, nor care about, what Clinton's choice of clothing is. Petty, nonsensical bull.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: dashen
+ Clinton is guilty of a long list of fashion crimes.
I mean how many pants suits can one woman have
So, we have no evidence that she is guilty of anything, she has not been charged with any crime, and so that means we have to resort to becoming fashion police to de-legitimize her?
I'm sorry. I'm a grown man and I do not pay attention to, nor care about, what Clinton's choice of clothing is. Petty, nonsensical bull.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: network dude
fanatical loons and haters.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: dashen
Sure, but has anything been found yet that she can be prosecuted for? That's the important question that not one of the anti-Hillary people seem willing to address.
They want it to be true. They want her to be found guilty of anything, and have already made up their mind that she is, but no charges yet. No guilty verdict.
I would say she has violated a few laws with this email scandal. Now if the prosecution doesn't want to do their job and prosecute that doesn't mean she didn't break the law. Just means she has friends in high places protecting her or themselves like others on here have pointed out.
The way the laws I mentioned are written and her keeping a private server makes it nearly impossible she didn't violate at least one of the articles of one of the laws I mentioned.
Now I will concede and say you are correct she has not been charged or found guilty. This fact alone does not mean she didn't violate the law.
She is a despicable woman period.
originally posted by: imitator
Bull#..... The Justice Department is full of it!
Clinton was under a subpoena to turn over her email by the Department of State.... she deleted them when requested.... She is guilty!!!
Public service is to be open and transparent...and that she is not!!!
2nd Bull#....
No way in hell is she leading national Democratic polls....
This just proves she is a witch!!!!
You didn't say no.......
essentially
So. Are you being paid per post or for the hour?