It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
originally posted by: BiffWellington
It's probably unwise to underestimate the lengths to which a hyperpowerful industry headed by greedy bastards will go in order to maintain and grow demand for its products.
Ask people being forced to inject their children against their will if they underestimate the power of the Pharma industry.
Commitment. It's calm resolve. It's knowing you are in a fight. Raw emotion is the sign of fear based programming and insecurity.
And a mandate isn't forcing someone to do something against their will is it?
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Pardon?
And a mandate isn't forcing someone to do something against their will is it?
A mandate, by definition, requires a particular act... if someone doesn't mind doing it, then no, it's not force... if someone does mind doing it then yes, it is force.
You can sugarcoat the truth, redefine words, make whatever excuses you choose. But I have done my due diligence, I know there is much that I do not know because I cannot know because that information is withheld under color of law, and I have come to an informed decision based on all the information available. Of course, that also means that I know that you don't know either.
We will have to agree to disagree.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Pardon?
a reply to: GetHyped
Bless your hearts for trying to show me the error of my ways... thank you from the bottom of my heart. But I'm not going to budge, nor will I play semantics with you. Putting someone in jail for not being vaccinated is in fact a form of force (at the point of a gun if necessary), as is any punitive action taken against that person. You may call it what you will.
Trump went so far as to recite a supposedly recent story of a toddler who had been diagnosed as autistic just a week after getting a shot and coming down with a fever.
“Just the other day, two years old, 2½ years old, a child, a beautiful child went to have the vaccine, and came back, and a week later got a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic,” he said.
I know you won't budge on here as that would be seen as you backing down and that would never happen would it?
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: Boadicea
You are mandated to hold a valid driving licence if you wish to drive on public roads. No one is forced to get a driving licence, though. Why? Because they mean completely different things.
I mean, you're never wrong are you?
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Pardon?
I know you won't budge on here as that would be seen as you backing down and that would never happen would it?
Oh dear... I won't budge because regardless of the word you use or I use, the end result is the same, and it's wrong. It doesn't matter if it's "on here" in a discussion of the threat, or in the real world in the actual act, it's wrong.
Which bit don't you get?
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: MotherMayEye
No matter how much you wish it to be so, mandatory =/= forced. You are free to home school your children or pack them off to a anti-vax friendly private school.
originally posted by: GetHyped
What you are not free to do is put other people's children in danger because of your willful ignorance.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: MotherMayEye
No matter how much you wish it to be so, mandatory =/= forced. You are free to home school your children or pack them off to a anti-vax friendly private school.
Yeah. I think we established this is not feasible in an economy that requires two parents to work to make ends meet.
originally posted by: GetHyped
What you are not free to do is put other people's children in danger because of your willful ignorance.
Fearmonger much? And Mandatory vaxxers claim that anti-vaxxers operate on fearmongering. Get a grip.
P.S. I vaccinate my kids -- because I listen to my pediatrician's advice, take it into consideration, then I make the final decision. So stuff your "willful ignorance."
originally posted by: GetHyped
You've established no such thing. All you're doing is contorting logic to try and make 'mandatory' = 'forced'.
originally posted by: GetHyped
You have a simple choice: either vaccinate your children, or school them in an anti-vax friendly establishment. Don't like it? Tough luck. I don't get to drive around without a licence and endanger people, you don't get to screw with herd immunity and harm people because of your willful ignorance.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Pardon?
Which bit don't you get?
Hmmmm.... I guess it's the bit where you keep pretending that people are not trying to force vaccinations on others, even including the force of a gun to throw people in jail... and of course why you keep beating a dead horse.
Any law which imposes punitive action against a person for not accepting vaccinations is wrong. Period. From telling someone they cannot attend a public school they help pay for to putting someone in jail. You can rationalize it, minimalize it, excuse it... it will still violate our natural, inalienable, and Constitutional right to be secure in our persons. It will also still violate the Nuremberg Code, used to prosecute Nazi war criminals who also thought it okay to perform medical procedures on people without their consent and against their will. And I will still oppose any such efforts.
If someone wants to open a private daycare and require vaccinations for all employees, children, and parents -- I totally and completely support their right to do so. I totally respect and support any person's right to accept any and all vaccinations they so choose.
I have made my position clear. You have made your position clear.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: GetHyped
You've established no such thing. All you're doing is contorting logic to try and make 'mandatory' = 'forced'.
Mandatory is not MY WORD, it is the word used by everyone describe the policy issue. I call it COERCION and I did so already in this thread.
originally posted by: GetHyped
You have a simple choice: either vaccinate your children, or school them in an anti-vax friendly establishment. Don't like it? Tough luck. I don't get to drive around without a licence and endanger people, you don't get to screw with herd immunity and harm people because of your willful ignorance.
AGAIN. I vaccinate my kids. So shove your "willful ignorance" up your fearmongering patootie.
There are not enough deaths due to non-vaccinated people to warrant such a government overreach -- which is much the same way I feel about the choice of whether or not to vaccinate. There aren't enough deaths due to vaccinations to warrant me not vaccinating my kids.
I don't subscribe to your fear-based logic.
I support choice and less government intrusion.
originally posted by: Pardon?
Personally, in my eyes though, one death is too many.