Satan Worshipers Come Out To Support Planned Parenthood

Satanism follows free will and living life the way you see fit. Being told that you can't get an abortion counters that, so it makes sense that they're supporting PP

a reply to: galadofwarthethird


We've got the simplton, uneducated religious nuts on one side calling everybody that doesn't resemble them, Satanic, demonic, and devils. While the paid liars and tyrants in office are quick to label everyone else terrorists, conspiracy kooks, subversive, and treasonous, the moment you look for transparency or verification of mishandle.

Between social issues plastered all over the news inciiting LEO vs citizen, Black vs White, confederates vs educated, Christian vs Jew vs Muslim, they've got you spinning so fast that you won't realize the floor dropping from under you until it's too late.

But hey, it may be a good thing to clean out the gene pool of the defective stock, by letting them kill each other. I can't see a downside to it.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: IAMTAT

And your demonization of PP continues. With all your anti PP threads you're gonna water down your message.

Demonization? I dunno, I think its fair since the founder of PP voluntarily spoke to the KKK and got other invitations from similar groups afterwards.

How ironic would it be if it turned out PP started as a eugenics program lol.

a reply to: Wardaddy454

Care to source the claim she spoke to the KKK? I'd like to read about it. While searching for the woman you speak of, I found this on her Wikipedia page. Kinda contradicts your claim.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

She collaborated with African-American leaders and professionals who saw a need for birth control in their communities. In 1929, James H. Hubert, a black social worker and leader of New York's Urban League, asked Sanger to open a clinic in Harlem.[109] Sanger secured funding from the Julius Rosenwald Fund and opened the clinic, staffed with black doctors, in 1930. The clinic was directed by a 15-member advisory board consisting of black doctors, nurses, clergy, journalists, and social workers. The clinic was publicized in the African-American press and in black churches, and it received the approval of W. E. B. Du Bois, founder of the NAACP.[110] Sanger did not tolerate bigotry among her staff, nor would she tolerate any refusal to work within interracial projects.[111] Sanger's work with minorities earned praise from Martin Luther King, Jr., in his 1966 acceptance speech for the Margaret Sanger award.[112]

a reply to: IAMTAT

This thread is a fail. In essence it is a Christian making a thread to talk down about another religion (Satanism), by trying to say that they are evil (though I bet you didn't check what kind of Satanists they are). Don't y'all get angry at atheists when they do that about Christianity? Well since you started it, the gloves are going to come off in this thread.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: IAMTAT

And your demonization of PP continues. With all your anti PP threads you're gonna water down your message.

Demonization? I dunno, I think its fair since the founder of PP voluntarily spoke to the KKK and got other invitations from similar groups afterwards.

Erm... Source for your craziness?

How ironic would it be if it turned out PP started as a eugenics program lol.

How ironic would it be if you would actually go honestly study what kind of eugenics Marget Sanger believed in and understand that her beliefs just mirrored cutting edge science at the time instead of creating strawmans about it?

I can't imagine that this is really going on in the world. . What happend to just growing organs from your own cells science isn't that good enough?

Jesus was a liberal socialist though so figure that one out

a reply to: Krazysh0t

How ironic would it be if you would actually go honestly study what kind of eugenics Marget Sanger believed in and understand that her beliefs just mirrored cutting edge science at the time instead of creating strawmans about it?

the cutting edge science was nothing but science prejudice, simple put most of the do called " cutting edge science" practiced or pushed those by the believed themselves to be smarter and better than everyone else. then you had people who supported it, who were rich and powerful who thought themselves to be better just because they came from the upper crust. or from some demented views such as Hitler who thought the American eugenics programs or study was the best thing since sliced bread.

like i always say from the wiki Margaret Sangercause it's fast. there is a lot more out there on it.

Here she found an area of overlap with eugenicists.[94] She believed that they both sought to "assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit." They differed in that "eugenists imply or insist that a woman's first duty is to the state; we contend that her duty to herself is her duty to the state."[95] Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, which aims to improve human hereditary traits through social intervention by reducing the reproduction of those who were considered unfit.[96][97]

In "The Morality of Birth Control," a 1921 speech, she divided society into three groups: the "educated and informed" class that regulated the size of their families, the "intelligent and responsible" who desired to control their families however did not have the means or the knowledge and the "irresponsible and reckless people" whose religious scruples "prevent their exercising control over their numbers." Sanger concludes "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped."[98]

regardless of what you call cutting edger science, that does not give them the right to limit ones belief and force the to stop having children.

and for a source for my hitler claim, just one for now and it's not a wiki. The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics plus as i said above there is more out there on it educate your self and stop making your own straw man argument.

Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. They were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Stamford, Yale, Harvard, and Princeton. These academicians espoused race theory and race science, and then faked and twisted data to serve eugenics' racist aims.

During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."

a reply to: hounddoghowlie

You can't compare the eugenics that Hitler practiced versus the eugenics Sanger believed in. They aren't the same thing. Yes, they are both flawed and should be viewed as such, but again they were the popular scientific beliefs of the day. Sanger wasn't about exterminating people because they were undesirable.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

did you not read the part about,

and the "irresponsible and reckless people" whose religious scruples "prevent their exercising control over their numbers." Sanger concludes "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped."Text Red

or

Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. They were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Stamford, Yale, Harvard, and Princeton. These academicians espoused race theory and race science, and then faked and twisted data to serve eugenics' racist aims.

who were the the "irresponsible and reckless people" whose religious scruples "prevent their exercising control over their numbers." sanger spoke of. during that time in the U.S. it was people of color and of ethnicity from counties that were the exact same ones hitler targeted.

during the late 1800's, early1900's blacks in the U.S. were very religious, same with immigrants from europe.
if not those then explain her words and the beliefs of the then cutting edge scientist of the time.

again it's out there and they say the same thing. i've given you two sources and shown you how she and they thought what more do you want.

granted she didn't march them to the chambers, she just wanted to keep them from breeding, oh how humane of her.

a reply to: hounddoghowlie

I'm not trying to defend eugenics. I know it was racist and that is why no one believes it anymore. I'm just saying that there is a STARK difference between the eugenics that Sanger believed in and the eugenics that Hitler believed in. Yes, they are both wrong, but to ignore the differences is blatantly dishonest. Sanger would never advocate gassing black people to get rid of them. She just wanted to push birth control to reduce the birth rate.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Apparently, Satan LOVES planned Parenthood, Abortion, and selling baby body parts....or, at least his followers do.

Supporting Planned Parenthood does NOT equate to LOVING abortion and/or selling baby parts. Your hyperbole is OLD.

In fact, I agree with the Satanists' message: "America is not a theocracy. End forced motherhood."

Most religious people have opinions I disagree with, but I try not to demonize the whole bunch... Of course, that's your agenda, so... Carry on. Good luck with that!

a reply to: IAMTAT

However, Satan may not be Planned Parenthood's first choice for a champion.

No their champion should be God he kills more babies than anything.

originally posted by: buster2010

No their champion should be God he kills more babies than anything.

Not God.

Satan.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I can't say I know alot about Satan. If you want to talk to an expert about Satan, email an expert. But I don't think Hillary is answering her email lately. I think that whole "Ashley Madison" thing, but I might be wrong.

As for Satan being pro-choice?

Yeah, he probably is.

He's also probably for "equal rights", (that dustup with Management a few millenia ago).



In closing. . . all I can say is, "What an endorsement!"

*shakes head and walks away*

originally posted by: MrMaybeNot
Some of these satan worshippers are quite weird.

Yes. There is legitimate Satanism. It is a serious religion.

These clowns? I dunno.

But, they've got the right message.

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Apparently, Satan LOVES planned Parenthood, Abortion, and selling baby body parts....or, at least his followers do.

Most religious people have opinions I disagree with, but I try not to demonize the whole bunch... Of course, that's your agenda, so... Carry on. Good luck with that!

'Try not to "demonize" Satanists'?
Good one, BH! Thanks.

a reply to: IAMTAT

If you demonize Satanists, do they appreciate it?

So the Communists come out to endorse the democrats running and Satanists come out to endorse Planned Parenthood.

Fun day of endorsements, huh?

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: IAMTAT

If you demonize Satanists, do they appreciate it?

So the Communists come out to endorse the democrats running and Satanists come out to endorse Planned Parenthood.

Fun day of endorsements, huh?

If you don't agree with my belief you're wrong?

Have you ever actually read up on legitimate Satanism?