It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Your question is poorly thought out. Darwin knew nothing about molecular biology and genetics. His work was developed simply on observation.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: Phantom423
Your question is poorly thought out. Darwin knew nothing about molecular biology and genetics. His work was developed simply on observation.
Lol there is a modern Darwinian evolution that includes those sciences .
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
I didn't use it as an excuse to push creationism? I simply said Darwinist can't answer the question and its a big big problem. Without a form of mutation that adds new base pairs to the genome without destroying previous information you have no mechanism by which things such as a flagellum or an eye or a lung can evolve from a simpler creature. You have no mechanism for a four-legged mammal to evolve into a whale. This is a major aspect of Darwinian evolution that is just assumed to be true. Everything Darwinian evolutionist claim hinders on this assumption being true.
Your problem has to do with trying to oversimplify evolution; and if you were TRULY interested in finding the answer to this question, you'd go look it up yourself and read it until you thoroughly understood it. If that still didn't help, you'd ask honest questions about it to people more knowledgeable than yourself to clear up any misunderstandings.
This thread just shows that you are content with misunderstanding it because you seem to think that because you misunderstand evolution, that somehow disproves it.
Mutation type that adds new base pairs=Not Found. Not Found=Big problem for Evolutionist
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
originally posted by: johnwick
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: ServantOfTheLamb
When the Creationists get more proof than "Magic" I'll listen.....till then I'll stick with science.
And no, you don't have proof.
what magic? it was done by scientists from another planet with an agenda. what is so hard to understand about that?
I'm in your camp, I think it was the aliens.
it makes most sense and answers all the mysteries very simply. It's peoples' egos that gives the most opposition to the idea that we're not at the top of the intelligence foodchain.