It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WarminIndy
a reply to: Bone75
Oh, so you are for a robot world where the robots are our slaves. That way we don't have to pay them.
See, the other guy on the thread here, said he makes $20k a year, by working. He also has children that he is taking care of. That means the other guy has a right to benefit from his labor and we should not be here with our hands out begging for the "fair share" if we aren't also willing to do our fair share of work also.
But I do not think the other poster is an elitist because he makes $20k a year, he's doing what he should. But I think you are an elitist because work seems to be beneath you.
The Fabian Society and the Bilderberg Group
It is interesting to note what leading Bilderberg members have had to say about the Group. David Rockefeller writes that “Bilderberg meetings must induce apocalyptic visions of omnipotent international bankers plotting with unscrupulous government officials to impose cunning schemes on an ignorant and unsuspecting world” (Rockefeller, pp. 410-1). Denis Healey writes that “in America they were attacked as a left-wing plot to subvert the United States, in Europe as a capitalist plot to undermine socialism” (Healey, p. 196).
In fact, all of the above statements are correct with the exception of the strange idea – no doubt the product of Socialist misdirection efforts – that the Group’s activities would somehow “undermine Socialism.” The truth of the matter is that the Bilderberg Group has been a Socialist operation from inception: by all accounts, Bilderberg was the brainchild of Polish Socialist Joseph Retinger who was a close collaborator of the Fabian Society.
originally posted by: nullafides
Unlike many...
I do not need to feel the "comfort" of belonging to a "side".
The Democrats say the parties changed platforms over time, so the Democrats are like the Republicans, so it would mean the Republicans and not the Democrats.
Abraham Lincoln, the 16th U.S. President and a Republican (left), and Franklin Roosevelt, the 32nd U.S. President and a Democrat. The Republican and Democratic parties effectively switched platforms between their presidencies.
During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.
Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: xuenchen
And who got us out of the mess that Hoover's administration allowed?
FDR. Civilian Conservation Corps. All the lovely lakes we have were built by those who wanted to work AND get help.
It was a beautiful plan, and it worked.
[source quote]Abraham Lincoln, the 16th U.S. President and a Republican (left), and Franklin Roosevelt, the 32nd U.S. President and a Democrat. The Republican and Democratic parties effectively switched platforms between their presidencies.
During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.
Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.[source quote]
Source
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: xuenchen
And who got us out of the mess that Hoover's administration allowed?
FDR. Civilian Conservation Corps. All the lovely lakes we have were built by those who wanted to work AND get help.
It was a beautiful plan, and it worked.
Abraham Lincoln, the 16th U.S. President and a Republican (left), and Franklin Roosevelt, the 32nd U.S. President and a Democrat. The Republican and Democratic parties effectively switched platforms between their presidencies.
During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.
Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.
Source
Roosevelt promised to "abolish useless offices" and "eliminate unnecessary functions of Government", stating that "Government – Federal and State and local – costs too much", and even promised to help facilitate the "restoration of the trade of the world".
Roosevelt lashed out at Hoover: "I accuse the present Administration of being the greatest spending Administration in peacetime in all our history."
en.wikipedia.org...
Roosevelt himself did not have a clear idea of the New Deal at this point, so he promised no specific programs.[14] It was said that "Even a vaguely talented dog-catcher could have been elected president against the Republicans."
en.wikipedia.org...
For more than two years, President Hoover had been restricting trade and increasing taxes on the wealthy with legislation such as the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act and the Revenue Act of 1932.
en.wikipedia.org...
Even though he kept Hoover's program, Roosevelt attacked the Republican for overspending and raising taxes. Hoover raised tariffs, income taxes, estate taxes, corporate taxes, and even slapped a tax on all bank checks. The last tax seems to have severely curtailed economic growth. Additionally, Hoover went after the New York Stock Exchange and Wall Street "fat cats." Hoover's tax increases and attack on Wall Street severely crippled the economy which led to Roosevelt's criticism.
One of Roosevelt's best and brightest, Rexford Tugwell, claimed the New Deal derived from Herbert Hoover.
www.examiner.com...
originally posted by: WarminIndy
a reply to: Indigo5
I would like to point out that the title in the OP is the name of the song, of which came at a time of greater political turmoil than today.
Florence Reese was merely asking which side is the good worker on, because that's the first line of the song.